rocketalum;1819382 wrote:I think you may have misheard. I believe Comney said the new information came to light through a totally separate non Clinton related investigation but what they found absolutely applies to the Clinton server/email/foundation case.

I may have misheard about the server part....but I know I heard them say it has NOTHING to do with the Clinton Foundation

Already rumors that this has to do with Terry McAuliffe and he will be the one who "falls on the sword"

rocketalum;1819387 wrote:So because it's not hard for you it can't possibly be hard for anyone else. It's not hard for me either but I don't have to take public transit to a polling place or find childcare, or worry about missing my shift and maybe those hours, tips, etc going to someone else. This may seem small but I don't think I've ever disagreed with anything you've said more than this.

Conservative thinking in a nutshell.

sleeper;1819385 wrote:Big if true.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/colin-powell-personal-email-secretary-of-state-115707

jedbartlet02;1819383 wrote:Colin Powell and Condi Rice did the EXACT same thing

Not really; they did not do it to hide criminal activity and obstruct justice.

jedbartlet02;1819390 wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/colin-powell-personal-email-secretary-of-state-115707

It's a meme dude.

jedbartlet02;1819383 wrote:Colin Powell and Condi Rice did the EXACT same thing

False, they did not use a private server. They used private emails. Regardless, they shouldn't be let off the hook either. Using Powell/Rice is not even a legitimate defense for Hillary being a corrupt piece of shit. This is just as weak as the "RUSSIA!!" argument.

My God, even CNN has it at the top of the page:

• [h=3]New emails pertinent to case discovered, Comey says[/h]

rocketalum;1819359 wrote:Impeachment, possibly. To succeed in the Senate trial to get her removed not likely. I wish this wasn't true but partisanship will matter more than justice. No way you get 2/3rds of the senate to vote against her. Let's just say the Senate comes out 50/50 after this election. No matter how bad the details, I can't see 16 D's voting against her.

To be clear I'm not supporting her or saying this would be justice, it wouldn't be. I'm saying I don't have enough faith in justice over partisanship. If elected she serves at least 4 years.

The republicans can just buy the votes, the way that votes were bought to push Obamacare. Money for your pet projects goes a LONG way.

rocketalum;1819365 wrote:So is it the FBI side of things where you draw the line? If it's just federal cases pending then of course Trump has to step down too. Or, since we are a country of laws where we are innocent until proven guilty must we assume both are clear of any wrongdoing and if so, why would either step down?

like_that;1819394 wrote:False, they did not use a private server. They used private emails. Regardless, they shouldn't be let off the hook either. Using Powell/Rice is not even a legitimate defense for Hillary being a corrupt piece of shit. This is just as weak as the "RUSSIA!!" argument.

I would think that the difference with that is that they didn't lie about it when asked. Probably didn't wipe 30,000 emails, either, to hide stuff.

Did they find her user name and password for her ashleymadison account?

IMO....if Comey had something that was going to result in criminal charges against Hillary.....he would've put it out there already.

I think they have already gone through all this information and they know exactly what they're going to do already

Assange sending vibes that next batch email dump should have enough ammo to get her arrested --- LOL

If we had a DoJ that was not completely corrupt she would have already been arrested.


Maybe Seth Rich, deceased, will finally rest peacefully.

I haven't heard anything about the severity.

Everything is quiet right now.

HRC will be President elect in less than 2 weeks.

Hearing that it is over 3 emails.

This is a non-story. Close the thread.

sleeper;1819425 wrote:Hearing that it is over 3 emails.

This is a non-story. Close the thread.

If that's the case......Comey will be pressured to give his Resignation

jedbartlet02;1819426 wrote:If that's the case......Comey will be pressured to give his Resignation

No he had to inform Congress if the investigation was to re-open. That's part of his job.

This is over 3 emails and checking to see if they were classified or not.

sleeper;1819427 wrote:No he had to inform Congress if the investigation was to re-open. That's part of his job.

This is over 3 emails and checking to see if they were classified or not.

Not saying I agree with it....but some people will pressure him if he re-opened it over 3 emails

jedbartlet02;1819429 wrote:Not saying I agree with it....but some people will pressure him if he re-opened it over 3 emails

Does it really matter honestly? He's likely done in January 2017; him resigning is rather irrelevant.

sleeper;1819430 wrote:Does it really matter honestly? He's likely done in January 2017; him resigning is rather irrelevant.

You make a good point

UPDATE: The F.B.I. clarified that the exchanges were not sent from her server, and stated that the devices/emails seized were from Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner.

LOL.

Yeah, she will be okay.

Pretty pathetic to reopen the investigation if that is the case.

It takes but one to prove a crime.

The Bleachbit undertaking to obstruct justice perhaps did not go far enough. It is always hard to reign everyone in who is involved in widespread corruption.

sleeper;1819425 wrote:Hearing that it is over 3 emails.

This is a non-story. Close the thread.

From the Washington Post:

Comey wrote that he had been briefed on the new material Thursday. “I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation,” he wrote.

An FBI spokesman on Friday declined to elaborate, and a spokesman for Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch declined to comment. A Clinton campaign spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Comey provided no details about the unrelated case that resulted in the finding of the new emails. A law enforcement official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the emails were “numerous” and that they are not related to hacks of recent Democratic Party institutions or the emails that have been released in recent days by the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks.




Maybe you got your info from Hillary.com ............

QuakerOats;1819436 wrote:From the Washington Post:

Comey wrote that he had been briefed on the new material Thursday. “I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation,” he wrote.

An FBI spokesman on Friday declined to elaborate, and a spokesman for Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch declined to comment. A Clinton campaign spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Comey provided no details about the unrelated case that resulted in the finding of the new emails. A law enforcement official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the emails were “numerous” and that they are not related to hacks of recent Democratic Party institutions or the emails that have been released in recent days by the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks.




Maybe you got your info from Hillary.com ............

She's going to be our next President.

When will you accept reality?

jedbartlet02;1819383 wrote:Colin Powell and Condi Rice did the EXACT same thing

Might be something more, and besides, Condi and Colin aren't running for president!

jedbartlet02;1819420 wrote:IMO....if Comey had something that was going to result in criminal charges against Hillary.....he would've put it out there already.

He already did. He or HRC committed perjury in front of the House committee. Supposedly that's a crime.