CenterBHSFan;1825019 wrote:That you have family (Muslim) who voted for Trump. They were not fearful of Trump. That's the cruxt of it - your family who are Muslim should have been fearful of Trump, not vote for him.

I'll let COA respond. I would hope he isn't as ignorant as he is coming off in this thread.

like_that;1825020 wrote:I'll let COA respond. I would hope he isn't as ignorant as he is coming off in this thread.

Good luck with that!

like_that;1825016 wrote:What are you referring to here?

Yeah I have no idea why Muslims wouldn't want to join a national registry. If your mom is ok with it, guess it's ok. Not like that's what happened to the Jews in 1933 or anything.

But hey, glad your dad could look past his wife having to register for other important issues.

Spock;1824859 wrote:Wife?

The "B" in LGTBQ is bisexual.

Yes, newsflash, bisexual women can choose to marry and be faithful to men .

Commander of Awesome;1824938 wrote:Some evidence for why jmog's friends/family members are completely misguided.

http://www.hrc.org/2016RepublicanFacts/donald-trump-opposes-nationwide-marriage-equality

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/heres-exactly-why-a-vote-for-trump-is-vote-against-lgbtq-rights_us_58110a32e4b0390e69cdface

lol voting against their own self interests.

Thanks for the call out jmog, HRC just got a donation from me, as did ACLU, and planned parent hood.

Did you really just quote hrc.org and HuffPo right after calling my wife and sister morons?

Let me go find some quote from Rush Limbaugh and see how much credibility you give it, he's about as far right as those two sites are far left.

You have completely ruined any chance that anyone would even think you had an ounce of truth to what you are saying.

At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

jmog;1825032 wrote:The "B" in LGTBQ is bisexual.

Not bacon?

Commander of Awesome;1825022 wrote:Yeah I have no idea why Muslims wouldn't want to join a national registry. ...

Which legislative body has proposed such a bill??

I still don't understand why "L" is used when "G" is in there. ???:RpS_blushing: Isn't that redundant? Aren't lesbians gay? Doesn't the use of the word "gay" apply to both make and female?

Con_Alma;1825038 wrote:I still don't understand why "L" is used when "G" is in there. ???:RpS_blushing: Isn't that redundant? Aren't lesbians gay? Doesn't the use of the word "gay" apply to both make and female?

I don't pretend to understand it all, I would think Bisexual fits everyone as, according to their own studies, sexuality is a spectrum, lets say 0-1 (0 is 100% straight and 1 is 100% homosexual). According to the research I have found, NO ONE is a 0 or a 1 (again, according to their research).

NO ONE is 100% straight or 100% homosexual, everyone is some spectrum of bisexual (as a very straight man I find this hard to believe as I know myself, but whatever).

So, given their own research the L and the G are already covered by the B...I guess.

But I'm just some straight white dude so I am probably homophobic with white privilege.

jmog;1825039 wrote:I don't pretend to understand it all, I would think Bisexual fits everyone as, according to their own studies, sexuality is a spectrum, lets say 0-1 (0 is 100% straight and 1 is 100% homosexual). According to the research I have found, NO ONE is a 0 or a 1 (again, according to their research).

NO ONE is 100% straight or 100% homosexual, everyone is some spectrum of bisexual (as a very straight man I find this hard to believe as I know myself, but whatever).

So, given their own research the L and the G are already covered by the B...I guess.

But I'm just some straight white dude so I am probably homophobic with white privilege.

I just say "Gay BLT"

jmog;1825039 wrote:I don't pretend to understand it all, I would think Bisexual fits everyone as, according to their own studies, sexuality is a spectrum, lets say 0-1 (0 is 100% straight and 1 is 100% homosexual). According to the research I have found, NO ONE is a 0 or a 1 (again, according to their research).

NO ONE is 100% straight or 100% homosexual, everyone is some spectrum of bisexual (as a very straight man I find this hard to believe as I know myself, but whatever).

So, given their own research the L and the G are already covered by the B...I guess.

But I'm just some straight white dude so I am probably homophobic with white privilege.

I am 100% not gay.

Spock;1825046 wrote:I am 100% not gay.

Suuuuuure

Spock;1825046 wrote:I am 100% not gay.

You are a boys gym teacher...exhibit A against your claim ��

Commander of Awesome;1825022 wrote:Yeah I have no idea why Muslims wouldn't want to join a national registry. If your mom is ok with it, guess it's ok. Not like that's what happened to the Jews in 1933 or anything.

But hey, glad your dad could look past his wife having to register for other important issues.

Yet you are ok with a no fly list where anybody can end up on it without being told they are on it and without being told why they are on it. No matter how much vox/slate/salon tells you Donald Trump will be hitler, it will never happen. You should go back to jr high and refresh yourself on how our government was designed to prevent one person to have that much power.

Based on your implosion in this thread I figured you were being ignorant and calling my family members dumbasses. Not to mention my experience with the Muslim religion is not even close to being limited to my mother, but please go on and tell me how you know much more, because a liberal headline told you so.


The following coming from you bring the lulz:

-The use of vox, slate, Atlantic, etc as legitimate sources. Would love to see your reaction if anybody (other than QO) used briebart, the blaze, conservative outfitters, etc as a source.

-The use of multiple links that you skimmed beyond the headline at most. Do you ever wonder why you have been called a useful idiot? Your responses are very predictable, because you're just repeating what every liberal meme tells you.

-Conveniently changing the topic to climate change after getting pwned by your original crime argument. Further lulz in the climate change debate is you use all the data to prove your point, which is great. I think climate change exists too, but lol at failing to see the hypocrisy of getting butt hurt of some people not accepting the data when you and all liberals do the same thing. I am still waiting for liberals to accept the data when it comes to African American households, real gun crime, the radical Islamic population, majority of native Americans aren't offending by the redskins, etc. Just another liberal that only uses data when it fits his/her ideological narrative.

-The fact you called every trump voter a bigot is probably the most ignorant shit I have seen on this site in a very long time. Grow the fuck up.

I am sorry at some point in your life you became a self loathing white male. You really have gone wacko In this thread and over the election results. My recommendation is to step away from the computer/vox articles and go take a hike. Maybe you will come back to reality.

like_that;1825060 wrote:Yet you are ok with a no fly list where anybody can end up on it without being told they are on it and without being told why they are on it. No matter how much vox/slate/salon tells you Donald Trump will be hitler, it will never happen. You should go back to jr high and refresh yourself on how our government was designed to prevent one person to have that much power.

Based on your implosion in this thread I figured you were being ignorant and calling my family members dumbasses. Not to mention my experience with the Muslim religion is not even close to being limited to my mother, but please go on and tell me how you know much more, because a liberal headline told you so.


The following coming from you bring the lulz:

-The use of vox, slate, Atlantic, etc as legitimate sources. Would love to see your reaction if anybody (other than QO) used briebart, the blaze, conservative outfitters, etc as a source.

-The use of multiple links that you skimmed beyond the headline at most. Do you ever wonder why you have been called a useful idiot? Your responses are very predictable, because you're just repeating what every liberal meme tells you.

-Conveniently changing the topic to climate change after getting pwned by your original crime argument. Further lulz in the climate change debate is you use all the data to prove your point, which is great. I think climate change exists too, but lol at failing to see the hypocrisy of getting butt hurt of some people not accepting the data when you and all liberals do the same thing. I am still waiting for liberals to accept the data when it comes to African American households, real gun crime, the radical Islamic population, majority of native Americans aren't offending by the redskins, etc. Just another liberal that only uses data when it fits his/her ideological narrative.

-The fact you called every trump voter a bigot is probably the most ignorant shit I have seen on this site in a very long time. Grow the fuck up.

I am sorry at some point in your life you became a self loathing white male. You really have gone wacko In this thread and over the election results. My recommendation is to step away from the computer/vox articles and go take a hike. Maybe you will come back to reality.

Link to me saying I'm cool with a no fly list?

Attacks the article source credibility, but offers no retort to claims or legitimacy of author/expert. I brought up climate change earlier as a non racial issue with Trump. Then climate change was questioned and then I responded. Then you call me names. lol typical response.

Commander of Awesome;1825061 wrote:Link to me saying I'm cool with a no fly list?

Attacks the article source credibility, but offers no retort to claims or legitimacy of author/expert. I brought up climate change earlier as a non racial issue with Trump. Then climate change was questioned and then I responded. Then you call me names. lol typical response.

You literally just referred to my family as dumbasses and have labeled 58 million people as bigots, but now you're taking the high road? Excuse me while I LMAO. Also don't give me shit about attack the source of the article, I've seen you do that numerous times. And no I'm not finding a link, because I'm on my phone, and you know damn well you have done it. Just another example of you being a hypocrite. Not to mention, posters here did look at your links and then looked at the raw data to ruin your argument.

Also, I brought up climate change just to point out the fact you only accept data when it fits your narrative or stance.

Speaking of hypocrisy does anyone else find the irony in younger liberals like COA, who recognize themselves as atheists or agnostic? They go out of their way to shit on every religion, but yet they preach empathy and judge others for their lack of empathy for the most flawed and dangerous religion in our modern society. Liberals always love to go out of their way to pretend they are morally superior to others. I am guilty of bashing religion, but at least I'm consistent across the board.


"Just because there are bad muslims, doesn't mean they are all bad!"

"All trump voters are bigot"

/coalogic

Spock;1825046 wrote:I am 100% not gay.

Usually, people who feel the need to state this so everyone can hear are the ones in the closet waiting to come out.

Spock;1825046 wrote:I am 100% not gay.

You're gayer than Tom Cruise, Ryan Secrest, and all of the other fake heteros.

Since the Rise of Milo, I'm thinking I might be around 8-10% gay.

Move over, Tomi...

[video=youtube;Xm0l5hsykDc][/video]

[video=youtube;52wGb7qt8Xg][/video]

So, I had this discussion today with my boss:

Should transabled people be able to have their disabling surgeries via medicaid?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_integrity_identity_disorder

Should Otherkin be allowed to dress as their chosen animal of choice, fictional or real, in the workplace?

Should other, non-trans, people be forced to play along or face some sort of penalty?

The world of "trans" is not just contained to transexual identities. So, where should the perimeters of other trans' be drawn? Should there be any sort of picking and choosing which is acceptable and which is not? Should actual biology make any difference? Is mental projections the only important thing?

Medicaid should only pay for necessary items. The government waste on these people for stupid things is unbelievable.

Just wait until transgender sports inevitably wipes out Title IX...or at least until some SJW's precious little snowflake loses a $250k college scholarship to a transgender.

gut;1844801 wrote:Just wait until transgender sports inevitably wipes out Title IX...or at least until some SJW's precious little snowflake loses a $250k college scholarship to a transgender.

I would love for this to happen.

The Texas House has passed legislation making it illegal for local police to not cooperate with federal authorities as it relates to immigration issues. This will not be pleasing to SJWs because it severely reduces a municipality's ability to function as a sanctuary city.