Midstate01;1782173 wrote:Crap, I forgot to add this, lost my train of thought. Later on the year we played a first year team. This time we scored less and made even more rules. AND in the line shaking hands, we were again told we were wrong.... because we went easy. Then their coach snubbed our kids in District voting.
Soooo, really it can be said there is no wrong or right way to do it
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
arnie palmer;1782183 wrote:Saw discussion on Yappi about this game and a couple comments from people that were there. Other team is a charter school in first year and players were terrible- could not even dribble, did not know where to line up, most shot attempts did not even hit rim, played zone and did not move or play defense, etc. They said starters only played first qtr. So from their prespective, coach did not try to run it up.
I officiate basketball now in NC and they use a running clock rule in the second half if lead is > 40 pts. I think OH should institute this rule and it would cut down a little on these blowout scores.
I was just reading that Yappi thread. To tie it in to what Midstate is saying, I think what a lot of people there don't seem to understand is that, in the minds of people trying to compete in a sport, not trying because you don't have to is just insulting as heck. To my perspective, if you're against an outmatched team and you (a) aren't pressing, (b) aren't going pure run-and-gun and (c) are playing everyone who is suited while giving your back-of-the-bench kids all the time you can, you have nothing to answer for, regardless of what the final score is.
If you're doing things to intentionally run up the score, you're not showing sportsmanship, but on the other hand, if you're going out of your way to not score by making up "hold the ball this long" or "pass this many times before shooting" rules, you're essentially patronizing the other team by telling them they aren't good enough for you to actually try against.