Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Aug 5, 2016 11:27am
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Aug 5, 2016 11:52am
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Aug 5, 2016 12:03pm
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?46239-Hillary-Clinton&p=1805784&viewfull=1#post1805784bases_loaded;1805807 wrote:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/breaking-lead-attorney-dnc-fraud-case-found-dead-1-week-serving-dnc-papers/
moar coincidences please
QQ beat you.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Aug 5, 2016 12:16pm
Man, this is how much I think both suck ass. I agree with you. I would take a third Obama term over the two. I think Obama is a c- president.sleeper;1805799 wrote:I'd take Obama over either H or T.
I'm not a huge fan of Obama either.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Aug 5, 2016 12:19pm
Thought this is somewhat relevant to the people or who feel this entire system is just a crock of shit....
http://freakonomics.com/podcast/idea-must-die-election-edition/
Solid listen. I really liked the concept of of the ranked voting. Also, straight ticket voting...such garbage. I had no idea about that...nor have I ever noticed it when voting.
http://freakonomics.com/podcast/idea-must-die-election-edition/
Solid listen. I really liked the concept of of the ranked voting. Also, straight ticket voting...such garbage. I had no idea about that...nor have I ever noticed it when voting.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Aug 5, 2016 12:35pm
Yeah, no matter which of the two wins, odds are it'll make the complaints of the last 16 years with Bush/Obama seem sort of frivolous. On one hard, you have a corrupt career politician whose stance on any issue is, uh, whatever she deems appropriate for the current occasion. On the other hand, you have a massive egomaniac with no filter, no self-control and seemingly no knowledge of anything outside his own personal world, to go with amazingly thin skin.like_that;1805815 wrote:Man, this is how much I think both suck ass. I agree with you. I would take a third Obama term over the two. I think Obama is a c- president.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Aug 5, 2016 2:05pm
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/438681/ami-horowitz-republican-national-convention
LOL ........not unexpected
LOL ........not unexpected
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Aug 5, 2016 2:35pm
Trump 86%like_that;1805292 wrote:Anyone take this quiz? I normally take this quiz from time to time.
http://www.isidewith.com/
I was 87% Gary Johnson as my top choice. Hillary came out at 41% for me.
Johnson 78%
Castle 78%
Clinton 31%
Stein 20%
I think I only got Trump higher than Johnson because I have rather strong believes about illegal immigration and I most those questions as "more/most" important.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Aug 5, 2016 2:36pm
I'd prefer to not "hangout" at either convention.
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Aug 5, 2016 2:39pm
Sleeper arguing with is alternate persona...good read.sleeper;1805528 wrote:You agree with 74% of a misogynistic, racist, asshole. I just call a spade a spade and if you agree 74% with Trump, then you are 74% racist.
I agree with 3% of Trump so I am 3% racist. Own it!
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Aug 5, 2016 2:42pm
I was thinking about why anyone ever want to be president in this time we live in. You would have to be so corrupt that you need to stay in the game or have such a huge ego the only way to fill it is to be leader of the country you live in.
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Aug 5, 2016 2:45pm
I am with you on that one O-Trap, I read belly's post 3 times and still couldn't understand what he was saying.O-Trap;1805706 wrote:
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Aug 5, 2016 2:49pm
Just since WW2, Hillary will probably win, but not by anything close to these landslides.FatHobbit;1805712 wrote:Seriously. Who will vote for Trump? People who were only going to vote R and racists? They were never going to vote for Hillary in the first place and I doubt they voted for Obama. I seriously think this will be the most lopsided loss in history. I'm amazed he won the primary. Fucking amazed.
For all the liberals like to joke about the Rs "love affair with Reagan" he won 2 of the top 3 most landslide victories in the last 80 years.
http://hubpages.com/politics/Landslide-The-Top-5-Most-Lopsided-US-Presidential-Elections-since-World-War-II
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Aug 5, 2016 2:58pm
I think Obama is an F and I would take him over both Trump and Hillary.like_that;1805815 wrote:Man, this is how much I think both suck ass. I agree with you. I would take a third Obama term over the two. I think Obama is a c- president.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Aug 5, 2016 3:12pm
Correct.Belly35;1805664 wrote:If being smart means you're up a 3 in the morning I must be the smartest guy on the OC every night around that time.
z4p not all engineers are "smart" outside that world of pro cad and their desk top many are socially stupid, dumb than a stump in common sense, personal hygiene and lack many time ambition, creativity.
You don't have to be smart ...to be smarter.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Aug 5, 2016 4:21pm
I'd rather drink a gallon of a strangers' spit than to vote for Hillary. So, I've made up my mind - Gary Johnson's got my vote.
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Aug 5, 2016 4:34pm
I wish Johnson even had a remote chance in Hell of winning. If he did he would have my vote as well. I 100% agree with your first statement which leads me to only one last option, and I will puke on my way in and out of the poling place in November doing it.CenterBHSFan;1805867 wrote:I'd rather drink a gallon of a strangers' spit than to vote for Hillary. So, I've made up my mind - Gary Johnson's got my vote.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Aug 5, 2016 4:38pm
Believe me, it's not anything that I look forward to, knowing that my vote is - for all intents and purposes - wasted. I'm uncomfortable doing it. Also, I can understand how Trump will get votes. People are just at that point...jmog;1805868 wrote:I wish Johnson even had a remote chance in Hell of winning. If he did he would have my vote as well. I 100% agree with your first statement which leads me to only one last option, and I will puke on my way in and out of the poling place in November doing it.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Aug 5, 2016 4:45pm
I have no problem voting for a pro-growth candidate:
The announcement comes ahead of Trump's planned economic policy speech in Detroit on Monday. Trump is slated to detail personal and corporate tax cuts as well as energy and health-care policy changes aimed to boost American economic growth.
"It's going to be a very substantial pro-growth message," Larry Kudlow, a senior CNBC contributor and informal adviser to the Trump campaign, said Thursday.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-unveils-12-person-economic-120530897.html
economic policy team announced.
The announcement comes ahead of Trump's planned economic policy speech in Detroit on Monday. Trump is slated to detail personal and corporate tax cuts as well as energy and health-care policy changes aimed to boost American economic growth.
"It's going to be a very substantial pro-growth message," Larry Kudlow, a senior CNBC contributor and informal adviser to the Trump campaign, said Thursday.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-unveils-12-person-economic-120530897.html
economic policy team announced.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Aug 5, 2016 4:52pm
Holy shit, policy...finally!
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Aug 5, 2016 4:59pm
If the media will only get off their Khan obsession, or else go after Khan and all his dealings.Automatik;1805872 wrote:Holy shit, policy...finally!
It is comical how Trump is attacked for 'mean' comments, but Hillary has a history of cursing, abusing and degrading those who work for her, from staff to secret service etc... ZERO attention from the mainstream media. Sick.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Aug 5, 2016 5:01pm
Maybe Trump should get off his Khan obsession, as he's the guy rolling out the red carpet for the media to keep giving it play.QuakerOats;1805875 wrote:If the media will only get off their Khan obsession, or else go after Khan and all his dealings.
It is comical how Trump is attacked for 'mean' comments, but Hillary has a history of cursing, abusing and degrading those who work for her, from staff to secret service etc... ZERO attention from the mainstream media. Sick.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 5, 2016 5:13pm
A policy team of CEOs and hedge fund managers.QuakerOats;1805870 wrote:I have no problem voting for a pro-growth candidate:
The announcement comes ahead of Trump's planned economic policy speech in Detroit on Monday. Trump is slated to detail personal and corporate tax cuts as well as energy and health-care policy changes aimed to boost American economic growth.
"It's going to be a very substantial pro-growth message," Larry Kudlow, a senior CNBC contributor and informal adviser to the Trump campaign, said Thursday.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-unveils-12-person-economic-120530897.html
economic policy team announced.
I'm not surprised but I'm not impressed.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Aug 5, 2016 5:18pm
Yeah, Trump can choose to just STFU regarding one topic and focus on others. It's time to sway the fringe voters, or not...LOLHeretic;1805876 wrote:Maybe Trump should get off his Khan obsession, as he's the guy rolling out the red carpet for the media to keep giving it play.
I'm sure QO doesn't get this. Talk about out of fucking touch.
Hillary cry post incoming!!!!
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 5, 2016 5:48pm
BUILD A WALL!!!!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!Automatik;1805872 wrote:Holy shit, policy...finally!