Archive 2016 Browns Season Thread

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Apr 27, 2016 7:14pm

Benjamin Allbright ‏@AllbrightNFL "We think you'd need to get ahead of #7 to get Paxton Lynch, most likely" -league source via text just now.

Umm, yes please. Means Browns will be sitting pretty.

S

slingshot4ever

Posts: 4,085

Apr 27, 2016 7:46pm

Infeel like the 1st round will be chalk full of trades tomorrow night

S

Sonofanump

Apr 27, 2016 8:54pm

Laley23;1793648 wrote:Yeah, no way I would say he will for sure be back at 100% or whatever.

However, I do think it's worth a flyer. I've also always been a fan of top recruits who pan out as top NFL picks. Shows they don't get complacent to some extent.

Well, if he was coming back at 100% then he would go in the first instead of the 4th-5th.

Laley23

Posts: 29,506

Apr 27, 2016 10:58pm

Sonofanump;1793664 wrote:Well, if he was coming back at 100% then he would go in the first instead of the 4th-5th.

What??

Of course, but it's 2016, and we have yet to invent something to predict the future.

Benny The Jet

Posts: 2,987

Apr 28, 2016 7:21am

What's everyone's final predictions? I say we trade down again and pick Conklin.

Also, saw 1 mock having us pick Henry with the 32nd pick. Alabama RBs make me nervous

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Apr 28, 2016 7:22am

SportsAndLady;1793646 wrote:Lol there's no way you can say with 100% certainty that someone will be able to fully recover from a severe knee injury with bad nerve damage.

I've read many Drs believe he will be 100% again just don't know when that will be due to how the nerves grow. He could play this year or 2 years from now. That's where the uncertainty is. To me it's worth a 3rd rd pick. He's the type of guy you can build your defense around and can change games like a Von miller/ Mack

V

vball10set

Posts: 24,795

Apr 28, 2016 7:27am

Crimson streak;1793709 wrote:I've read many Drs believe he will be 100% again just don't know when that will be due to how the nerves grow. He could play this year or 2 years from now. That's where the uncertainty is. To me it's worth a 3rd rd pick. He's the type of guy you can build your defense around and can change games like a Von miller/ Mack

many? prone to hyperbole much??

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Apr 28, 2016 8:10am

Benny The Jet;1793708 wrote:What's everyone's final predictions? I say we trade down again and pick Conklin.

Also, saw 1 mock having us pick Henry with the 32nd pick. Alabama RBs make me nervous

I think we see another trade down, but no idea who we pick after that.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Apr 28, 2016 8:53am

Crimson streak;1793709 wrote:I've read many Drs believe he will be 100% again just don't know when that will be due to how the nerves grow. He could play this year or 2 years from now. That's where the uncertainty is. To me it's worth a 3rd rd pick. He's the type of guy you can build your defense around and can change games like a Von miller/ Mack

No. If that were true, he wouldn't be going so late. If he truly were Von Miller just a year or two away from recovering 100% from injury, he would be the top pick.

There's definitely a question mark with him. Will he ever be able to play again? Will he ever be able to play like he used to play? There's no way you can say the answer to both of those questions is 100% yes.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Apr 28, 2016 8:54am

Benny The Jet;1793708 wrote:What's everyone's final predictions? I say we trade down again and pick Conklin.

Also, saw 1 mock having us pick Henry with the 32nd pick. Alabama RBs make me nervous

Stanley from ND. I don't think they'll get enough value by trading out of 8. They'll take the tackle at 8.

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Apr 28, 2016 9:03am

I think Stanley or Conklin is the pick.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Azubuike24

Posts: 15,933

Apr 28, 2016 9:04am

Any first round pick gets an extra 5th year on the deal, might make the last few picks of RD1 popular for teams wanting a developmental QB.

Mulva

Posts: 13,650

Apr 28, 2016 9:11am

I think we end up trading down again.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Apr 28, 2016 9:49am

SportsAndLady;1793717 wrote:No. If that were true, he wouldn't be going so late. If he truly were Von Miller just a year or two away from recovering 100% from injury, he would be the top pick.

There's definitely a question mark with him. Will he ever be able to play again? Will he ever be able to play like he used to play? There's no way you can say the answer to both of those questions is 100% yes.

I agree with you there. In my opinion it's worth the risk at the 3rd round.

S

slingshot4ever

Posts: 4,085

Apr 28, 2016 10:40am

Dolphins trade up to 8 from 13 for Elliot. We take Conklin or Lynch at 13.

S

Sonofanump

Apr 28, 2016 10:59am

slingshot4ever;1793741 wrote:or Lynch at 13.

I would not want Lynch unless it's 3rd round or later as a major project.

sleeper

Posts: 27,879

Apr 28, 2016 11:05am

Laley23;1793648 wrote:Yeah, no way I would say he will for sure be back at 100% or whatever.

However, I do think it's worth a flyer. I've also always been a fan of top recruits who pan out as top NFL picks. Shows they don't get complacent to some extent.

Flyer as in 6th round+?

That's the earliest I want to take flyers.

iclfan2

Posts: 6,360

Apr 28, 2016 1:45pm

Stanley is supposedly going 3rd to SD, which will be a shock because Tunsil is much better talent wise. Maybe injury or character concerns.

Hell no on Henry.

I think we stay at 8 and pick Bosa if we don't get a deal, or that we trade down with Miami and grab Treadwell/Coleman/ or I guess Conklin. I think Conklin might go before there if Stanley goes so early.

sleeper

Posts: 27,879

Apr 28, 2016 2:45pm

iclfan2;1793774 wrote:Stanley is supposedly going 3rd to SD, which will be a shock because Tunsil is much better talent wise. Maybe injury or character concerns.

Hell no on Henry.

I think we stay at 8 and pick Bosa if we don't get a deal, or that we trade down with Miami and grab Treadwell/Coleman/ or I guess Conklin. I think Conklin might go before there if Stanley goes so early.

I'd love to grab Bosa at #8 but I doubt he's still there.

Laley23

Posts: 29,506

Apr 28, 2016 2:50pm

Tunsil being sued by stepfather is possibly why Stanley is going before him.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Apr 28, 2016 3:16pm

Laley23;1793783 wrote:Tunsil being sued by stepfather is possibly why Stanley is going before him.

I would think its more to do with his injury history.

Laley23

Posts: 29,506

Apr 28, 2016 3:39pm

Commander of Awesome;1793784 wrote:I would think its more to do with his injury history.

I agree and tend to assume that's the case.

But, it is interesting he was rumored to be the pick until today, and the stepfather stuff just broke...yesterday???

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Apr 28, 2016 4:32pm

Alright locking in who I want the Browns to draft:

1. Bosa
2. Buckner
3. Jack
4. Trade back and take best WR (Coleman or Treadwell), Decker, Lee

I'll be pretty pissed if we take:
Lynch
Cook
Tackle at 8 (Esp Stanley)
CB
Zeke
Fuller
Ragland
Joseph

S

slingshot4ever

Posts: 4,085

Apr 28, 2016 5:03pm

Commander of Awesome;1793790 wrote:Alright locking in who I want the Browns to draft:

1. Bosa
2. Buckner
3. Jack
4. Trade back and take best WR (Coleman or Treadwell), Decker, Lee

I'll be pretty pissed if we take:
Lynch
Cook
Tackle at 8 (Esp Stanley)
CB
Zeke
Fuller
Ragland
Joseph

Be prepared to be pissed

Mulva

Posts: 13,650

Apr 28, 2016 5:16pm

I like Doctson of the receivers, slightly ahead of Treadwell. He reminds me of a Jordan Matthews type. Think he could be a solid #2 if Gordon ever gets back on the field.

At 8, I like Buckner (but don't think he'll be there) and Jack as long as his knee checked out with the medical team. Like Bosa much more in a 4-3 than 3-4. I wouldn't mind trading down to accumulate more assets /rebuild