Archive 2016 Browns Season Thread

Ironman92

Posts: 49,363

Dec 19, 2016 11:18am

SportsAndLady;1829170 wrote:1 and 6 would be real nice.

1 and top 10 would be fine though.

Now let's draft some fucking keepers FFS.

QB and ? Stud OL or DL?

Benny The Jet

Posts: 2,987

Dec 19, 2016 11:23am

Ironman92;1829171 wrote:QB and ? Stud OL or DL?

I'd take Garrett with that #1, and then best OL available. QB in the 2nd...just isn't a QB to me worth a top 10 pick. Plus, this Oline has been getting QB's killed all year long. There's so many needs though honestly, that as long as you don't go K or P, you improved your team....hopefully.

Benny The Jet

Posts: 2,987

Dec 19, 2016 11:29am

Azubuike24;1829160 wrote:If Atlanta would do it, would you trade the #1 overall pick for Matt Ryan in the off-season?

Seems like I'm in the minority, but a 32 year old QB coming from a team that he had Julio and White to throw to his whole career and we have Coleman and Pryor with this OL? I'll pass on that for a #1. Now, if they were close to being a contender, and this put them over the top...sure. But they aren't.

iclfan2

Posts: 6,360

Dec 19, 2016 11:33am

Benny The Jet;1829176 wrote:Seems like I'm in the minority, but a 32 year old QB coming from a team that he had Julio and White to throw to his whole career and we have Coleman and Pryor with this OL? I'll pass on that for a #1. Now, if they were close to being a contender, and this put them over the top...sure. But they aren't.

I was thinking that as well. Only has 2 years left on contract and the team is more than 2 away from being a contender.

Give me Garrett and then BPA at the Eagle's pick/ a QB if Trubisky or Kizer is there. I also wouldn't be that mad with trading a 2nd rounder for Garappolo if that is available instead of a 1st on Kizer/Trubisky.

shook_17

Posts: 3,023

Dec 19, 2016 4:11pm

Welp RG3 is starting Sunday.

Ironman92

Posts: 49,363

Dec 19, 2016 4:13pm

Benny The Jet;1829173 wrote:I'd take Garrett with that #1, and then best OL available. QB in the 2nd...just isn't a QB to me worth a top 10 pick. Plus, this Oline has been getting QB's killed all year long. There's so many needs though honestly, that as long as you don't go K or P, you improved your team....hopefully.

If I had a guaranteed Justin Tucker I would

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Dec 19, 2016 4:14pm

iclfan2;1829177 wrote:I was thinking that as well. Only has 2 years left on contract and the team is more than 2 away from being a contender.

Give me Garrett and then BPA at the Eagle's pick/ a QB if Trubisky or Kizer is there. I also wouldn't be that mad with trading a 2nd rounder for Garappolo if that is available instead of a 1st on Kizer/Trubisky.

This is something I could really get behind. I don't know how willing NE will be to trace garappolo

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Dec 19, 2016 4:21pm

Benny The Jet;1829173 wrote:I'd take Garrett with that #1, and then best OL available. QB in the 2nd...just isn't a QB to me worth a top 10 pick. Plus, this Oline has been getting QB's killed all year long. There's so many needs though honestly, that as long as you don't go K or P, you improved your team....hopefully.

Can we at least wait until closer to the draft to declare no qbs being worth a damn? Someone will emerge.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Dec 19, 2016 4:30pm

SportsAndLady;1829240 wrote:Can we at least wait until closer to the draft to declare no qbs being worth a damn? Someone will emerge.

Agreed and I think it will be trubisky if he declares. Either way I'm not sold on any of the qb, they all have some flaws. If I had to pick it would be either trubisky or Kizer. But we shall see closer to the draft

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

iclfan2

Posts: 6,360

Dec 19, 2016 5:33pm

Kizer and Trubisky (if he comes out, would be stupid not to) will both be top 15 picks. Question is if you take one at #1 or hope one falls to 8ish.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wes_mantooth

Posts: 17,977

Dec 19, 2016 6:11pm

I know we need a qb but let's take the no doubt, blue chipper.....miles Garrett. Our roster is so devoid of talent that we can't pass him up

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Dec 19, 2016 6:16pm

SportsAndLady;1829240 wrote:Can we at least wait until closer to the draft to declare no qbs being worth a damn? Someone will emerge.

If they emerge after scouts/gms watch film, then sure. If they are emerging because of a stupid fucking combine or workout with a "positive" interview, then they can fuck right off.

wes_mantooth;1829258 wrote:I know we need a qb but let's take the no doubt, blue chipper.....miles Garrett. Our roster is so devoid of talent that we can't pass him up

This. Can we for once take the BPA, instead of getting cute with needs?

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Dec 19, 2016 6:25pm

I'm okay with miles garrett. But let's not say he's a sure thing lol. He can very easily be a bust.

Or pull a Browns and get arrested for smacking up a chick the night he's drafted and never see the field.

S

Sonofanump

Dec 19, 2016 6:29pm

I don't remember, was Courtney Brown an obvious #1 pick?

sleeper

Posts: 27,879

Dec 19, 2016 6:32pm

We need a QB.

None of the QBs in this draft look very strong. I'd rather draft something else and make a trade for a competent QB, even if it costs us a few draft picks.

The Browns have little talent so hitting on picks is more important than the positions drafted.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Dec 19, 2016 7:34pm

sleeper;1829264 wrote:We need a QB.

None of the QBs in this draft look very strong. I'd rather draft something else and make a trade for a competent QB, even if it costs us a few draft picks.

The Browns have little talent so hitting on picks is more important than the positions drafted.

This too.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Dec 20, 2016 3:03pm

Sonofanump;1829263 wrote:I don't remember, was Courtney Brown an obvious #1 pick?

Yes. Never missed a snap bc of injury before Browns either.

Ironman92

Posts: 49,363

Dec 20, 2016 5:13pm

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Dec 20, 2016 8:21pm

JT with his 10th straight pro bowl selection, but how the fuck is Joe Haden an alternate?!?!?

bases_loaded

Posts: 6,912

Dec 20, 2016 11:07pm

like_that;1829399 wrote:JT with his 10th straight pro bowl selection, but how the fuck is Joe Haden an alternate?!?!?

The same reason JT is a starter. The fraternity is strong.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Dec 21, 2016 9:19am

I thought Shelton had a chance of making it. He has really played well this year

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Dec 21, 2016 10:11am

bases_loaded;1829412 wrote:The same reason JT is a starter. The fraternity is strong.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You don't think Thomas earned it this year?

sleeper

Posts: 27,879

Dec 21, 2016 10:28am

like_that;1829399 wrote:JT with his 10th straight pro bowl selection, but how the fuck is Joe Haden an alternate?!?!?

JT deserves it.

Haden is trash. I'd take a 6th rounder for Haden at this point.

sleeper

Posts: 27,879

Dec 21, 2016 10:28am

SportsAndLady;1829436 wrote:You don't think Thomas earned it this year?

He earns it every year. Name a better LT in the league.

I'll wait.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Dec 21, 2016 11:00am

Crimson streak;1829432 wrote:I thought Shelton had a chance of making it. He has really played well this year

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He really has. I've been VERY happy to eat crow on him and shame on me for bailing on him in a year.

For those that remember, I wanted Shelton/Erving that yr in the draft, thought both were studs. I was ready to bail on both of them after year one, as both were fucking trash. Glad I was wrong on Shelton being a bitch boy, here's hoping I'm wrong about Erving next season.