I haven't seen enough film on Wentz or Goff but I can tell you this, none of them can be anywhere near as bad as Manziel, Quinn, or Weeden. What a disaster those 3 picks were.SportsAndLady;1785538 wrote:It's been painful my entire life lol I can do another few years of shitty records as long as I know we have a QB for the future. And the FO seems like they know how to build a winning team behind that QB.
Probably because if he gets suspended the Browns will save more money.sleeper;1785543 wrote:I haven't seen enough film on Wentz or Goff but I can tell you this, none of them can be anywhere near as bad as Manziel, Quinn, or Weeden. What a disaster those 3 picks were.
Also, why is JFF still on the team? Dumpster him already jesus.
No clue on manziel. Assuming it has to be something with the rule/law and it's only a matter of time. Because no one in this FO wants him.sleeper;1785543 wrote:I haven't seen enough film on Wentz or Goff but I can tell you this, none of them can be anywhere near as bad as Manziel, Quinn, or Weeden. What a disaster those 3 picks were.
Also, why is JFF still on the team? Dumpster him already jesus.
They should get two pretty high ones for Mack & Schwartz, assuming they don't start signing a bunch of FA's. I'd think they might get a 3rd rounder for the loss of Mack.like_that;1785541 wrote:I wonder how many comp picks they will get out of this?
I thought if they drafted a QB that high and didn't start him from day 1, it was a "fireable offense?" (Not your words, BTW)SportsAndLady;1785548 wrote: As for the QB, give me Wentz. Start Mccown. Soon as any shot of a winning record/playoff appearance becomes impossible, throw Wentz in there.
Heard this morning, on the drive in, that there were 3 teams that sent out "feelers" regarding his availability in a trade. I don't care if they can get a used golf cart for him. At this point, TAKE IT.friendfromlowry;1785549 wrote:Also, think they're waiting to make sure no more trade offers come in on Manziel as other teams free agency plans fall apart.
But with the number of holes they have, it's no going to happen that quickly, most likely. They might have the worst WR corps in the league and there are question marks at 3 OL positions. That likely won't get fixed in a years. It's possible but not likely. If Wentz, or whoever, balls out in the first year, maybe they accelerate the process.SportsAndLady;1785528 wrote:If Wentz (or whoever they pick at 2) ends up being a stud, it'll be fine. It's so easy to turn it around in the NFL in one season if you have a good QB.
If they have a good QB and want to spend the money, they can fill holes. Stop being so dramatic. This isn't a college football program, they can pick up players to fill holes if they feel they have their QB and have a team that can contend.BR1986FB;1785554 wrote:But with the number of holes they have, it's no going to happen that quickly, most likely. They might have the worst WR corps in the league and there are question marks at 3 OL positions. That likely won't get fixed in a years. It's possible but not likely. If Wentz, or whoever, balls out in the first year, maybe they accelerate the process.
Not really sure what that means but whoever said that I disagree with him. I'm not saying sit Wentz for two seasons. But I don't believe he should be thrown to the wolves from day 1. Especially with this roster we are going to field.BR1986FB;1785552 wrote:I thought if they drafted a QB that high and didn't start him from day 1, it was a "fireable offense?" (Not your words, BTW)
Who's being "dramatic?" I just made a simple statement that they aren't easily going to fill all of those holes in one years time, whether through the draft or free agency.SportsAndLady;1785555 wrote:If they have a good QB and want to spend the money, they can fill holes. Stop being so dramatic. This isn't a college football program, they can pick up players to fill holes if they feel they have their QB and have a team that can contend.
I look at it this way, McCown got injured THREE times last year behind that "vaunted" O-Line. That's not including his dumbass helicopter move versus the Jets in week 1 which was his own fault. I agree with you that if they can throw McCown out there as a piñata until the rook learns the ropes, no problem.SportsAndLady;1785557 wrote:Not really sure what that means but whoever said that I disagree with him. I'm not saying sit Wentz for two seasons. But I don't believe he should be thrown to the wolves from day 1. Especially with this roster we are going to field.
the browns would have to over spend for even scrap heap players, they dont have enough money to fill all the holesSportsAndLady;1785555 wrote:If they have a good QB and want to spend the money, they can fill holes. Stop being so dramatic. This isn't a college football program, they can pick up players to fill holes if they feel they have their QB and have a team that can contend.
Not to mention that even if the rookie QB shows promise in their first season, players will still probably look at the Browns with a jaundiced eye and be skeptical about joining. They are going to have to establish a bit of a winning track record before decent FA's will want to come here. Then there's still the possibility that the front office doesn't value FA like others do.KnightRyder;1785561 wrote:the browns would have to over spend for even scrap heap players, they dont have enough money to fill all the holes
This.queencitybuckeye;1785562 wrote:You aren't going to get many quality free agents without grossly overspending until you begin to build a quality franchise through the draft.
also midwest cities are always a tough sell for quality free agentsBR1986FB;1785563 wrote:Not to mention that even if the rookie QB shows promise in their first season, players will still probably look at the Browns with a jaundiced eye and be skeptical about joining. They are going to have to establish a bit of a winning track record before decent FA's will want to come here. Then there's still the possibility that the front office doesn't value FA like others do.
I think Joe Haden's gone too.KnightRyder;1785566 wrote:losing 40 percent of the offensive line changes things. i would imagine joe thomas could be draft day trade bait
That is exactly what I said. You're not going to get any FA's come to the Browns now, but if Wentz turns out to be a stud, and they're threatening playoffs, FA's will come and you'll fill holes.queencitybuckeye;1785562 wrote:You aren't going to get many quality free agents without grossly overspending until you begin to build a quality franchise through the draft.
I think that we'll see improvement in Erving from year one to year two but having Pasztor out there at RT doesn't give me the warm fuzzies. I'm still holding out that they could get someone like Wisniewski on a one year dealiclfan2;1785567 wrote: With Bitonio back, and pastor having rt experience, and Erving being a true center (can't use his guard experience), I think we will be adequate on the offensive line.
Exactly. A good draft starts the ball rolling, another shitty one ruins this year and next year's free agent period.SportsAndLady;1785569 wrote:
Problem is, can the Browns have a successful draft or two. It's been about 300 years since they have.
I think Haden and JT are gone if this is the plan. Draft your QB of the future and build a young team around him.BR1986FB;1785568 wrote:I think Joe Haden's gone too.
Had they somehow kept Schwartz & Mack, I would've figured JT was safe but, at this stage, what's the point? Sure I'd like to see him retire a Brown but if they are going young, they might as well go all in. A rookie QB will obviously need backside protection but I just don't completely know where this new regime's mindset is.