isadore;1758350 wrote:long term trends have their effect. But at times events accelerate. We can see that in gay marriage issue. It is not that many years ago when it was consistently losing at the polls, and leading politicians in mass opposed it, with the liberal examples of Obama and the Clintons. Now the conservatives who oppose want an amendment to outlaw it look like troglodytes to the majority of the population.
I glad it happened. A Clinton election and a few geezers on the Supreme Court bite the dust, kiss Heller good bye. Not quite repeal of the 2nd but some real regulation.

It's unfortunate you are unwilling to answer my question. Even when you and I may agree on an issue you are unwilling to engage in a a discussion so that I might learn more about different viewpoints and ways of approaching a topic.

I don't think I have tried to be confusing. Please accept my apology if I have.

Con_Alma;1758419 wrote:It's unfortunate you are unwilling to answer my question. Even when you and I may agree on an issue you are unwilling to engage in a a discussion so that I might learn more about different viewpoints and ways of approaching a topic.

I don't think I have tried to be confusing. Please accept my apology if I have.

gosh a ruddies what is your question?

It's in the quote you responded to. It's the second sentence.

Con_Alma;1758302 wrote:Now that's interesting to me.

Whereby did you come to that conclusion from? It's culture that will make the biggest impact as opposed to legislation in my opinion. I see it with regards to drugs and alcohol.

Gosh a ruddies, this question? Declining gun ownership and declining number of hunters would be signs of a changing culture. Fewer and fewer people feel they need a gun in their homes.

Well the CNBC moderators got the ass kicked last night, and rightfully so ---- what an absolute disgrace.

Cruz, Rubio and Christie took them to the woodshed and exposed them and all the media for the biased fools that they are.

Hats off to Mr. Cruz for setting the pace in that regard; he was fantastic.

The questions were really beyond stupid.

QuakerOats;1759698 wrote:Well the CNBC moderators got the ass kicked last night, and rightfully so ---- what an absolute disgrace.

Cruz, Rubio and Christie took them to the woodshed and exposed them and all the media for the biased fools that they are.

Hats off to Mr. Cruz for setting the pace in that regard; he was fantastic.

I tend to agree QO. The Cruz comment "not a single one of you will be voting in a Republican primary" was priceless. Rubio saying that the MSM is a Dem PAC was good as well. Christie calling them out on the fantasy football issue was a great swipe.

RNC needs to think twice about which media outlets or other organizations will be awarded debate moderation in the future. Candidates also need to be ready to continue calling out the moderators for what and who they are for the remaining 2016 debates.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/258673-rnc-pulls-out-of-nbc-debate


RNC pulling out of NBC debate in Feb. THANK YOU

This couldn't have gone better for Repubs if the whole thing had been planned...

gut;1759903 wrote:This couldn't have gone better for Repubs if the whole thing had been planned...

Why, do you think anyone besides Republicans care that they're butthurt over this? Lol. Yeah this really did well, to the people who say "libtards" in everyday vernacular. The rest of the county doesn't give a shit. Of course, except for you, since you like to swear up and down you're not Republican lol.

^^^^ Captain Obvious.....Why would any Socialists care if the media was biased toward them?

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1760034 wrote:Of course, except for you, since you like to swear up and down you're not Republican lol.

A sycophantic media is why libtards are so ignorant on so many issues. We'll just print more money - DDDDDDEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRPPPPPPP.

And unless you get your news from Twitter and Facebook (which in your case is a strong possibility), plenty on the left have been criticizing that debate. That team was entirely unprepared and asked shitty questions...but I guess some people aren't bright enough to know the difference.

And as I've explained many times, I'm libertarian, which is a lot closer to the so called Repubs than it is to the socialists currently running the Democratic party. I vote for who I think will spend less and waste less money and don't get caught up in all the clown issues manufactured to distract me from what matters.

But I'm not a socialist, therefore I must be a Republican...and you wonder why people call you libtards.

HitsRus;1760043 wrote:^^^^ Captain Obvious.....Why would any Socialists care if the media was biased toward them?

gut;1760067 wrote:
But I'm not a socialist, therefore I must be a Republican...and you wonder why people call you libtards.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1760331 wrote:

Are you still confident Bernie is going to win the primary?

like_that;1760333 wrote:Are you still confident Bernie is going to win the primary?

No the party has made it clear its Hillary.