Spock;1744920 wrote:Trump comment "this country is $19 billion in debt, $1 million dollars a minute. You need a business man in the white house" that hit home pretty hard.
Well, at least until someone asks him if his plan would be to have the U.S. file for corporate bankruptcy like he has, what, four times.
sleeper;1744927 wrote:It's really a turn off for someone like me.
Yeah. I think it's sort of a stupid plan. Talk up your religion shit while around your loyal following, but quash that in favor of relevant nation-running issues for the big public events. To do otherwise shows a complete ignorance of statistics and trends. The closeness of recent elections seems to illustrate there are a fairly equal number of voters who are primarily democrat or republican (ie: always or usually vote that way), with the rest being more or less independent (or at least non-party line). I don't know if you'd go 35-35-30, 40-40-20, 45-45-10 or whatever to split those groups up, but two things probably should be taken into consideration.
1. A hardcore republican voter isn't going to turn about and vote for the democratic nominee because their guy didn't meet the quota for Jebus references.
2. That percentage of independent voters is probably the one you'll need to attract, as they'll be the ones that decide the race. When it comes to those, I'd wager a lot of them are more conservative on a fiscal/safety level (ie: do something about this fucking welfare issue and why are we being overrun by illegals again?) and more liberal on a social level. The more emphasis gets placed on religion and other social-based issues, the more likely they're going to vote D.
I think that's an aspect where Kasich "gets it" with his "I don't personally agree, but the people spoke, so I'll have to adjust my stance" comments about gay marriage. That's a dude smart enough to know where things should be focused and that those social issues are nothing but detrimental to the cause in the long run.