bigkahuna;1757124 wrote:Been a couple posts since we got a "gosh a roodies" Please fuck off

O-Trap;1757115 wrote:Only inasmuch as you want it to be. Also, this sentence is awkwardly stated. You might want to work on that.



Why are you calling anyone a separate race? Humans are a race. Any grouping or classification therein is not a separate race.

And again, I pulled out an offensive comparison to demonstrate that your line of reasoning is what leads to the unjust classification of entire segments of the population. You've compared me to the Nazis (Reductio ad Hitlerum, but whatever), but it's interesting how you think an inadequate sample can be used to define the whole, which is precisely what they did with not only the Jews, but any people group they decided (based on a too-small sample) were preventing human progress. You set a dangerous precedent with your insistence that an entire population can be defined by an action or characteristic that is only present in an insufficient sample.



Perhaps I should have, as it appears you've again missed the forest for the trees. I trust that your density is intentional.



No, I used black people. They're as American as you or I. And I picked them because I knew you'd object to the conclusion, which is the correct response. However, the conclusion was only reached by applying your own logical construct. By the same extension, we can essentially treat every segmentation ... slice it however you like ... according to their stereotypes. If we assert that your logical construct is accurate, which would suggest that pitbull breeds are killers, we'd also have to assume that all white people are superficial (See what I did there?), all the elderly are terrible with electronics, all dads are blithering idiots, all people who live in Texas are politically conservative, etc.

By objecting to any of the parallels above, not to mention the first one that paralleled an inaccurate stereotype about pitbull breeds with an inaccurate stereotype about black people, you've demonstrated that you don't actually believe your own logical construct. You merely adhere to it when it suits your irrational fears, which you should really work on by the way. Maybe therapy?



Ah, but they aren't dangerous, and that has been my position all along. If anything, it is you who is comparing anyone to anything you assert as dangerous. Interesting how quickly you took a parallel involving two different subjects and quickly turned it into a comparison between the two subjects. You might want to look into why you did that.

Gosh a ruddies I guess you have a problem sending replies or you felt some psychological need to repeat your defense of the indefensible. You can twist and turn all you want, play whatever word game you wish, you made the choice to put human beings on the same level as killer dogs and that choice defined you as a person. Hopefully you have removed any pit bull from your residence. If not you have shown a selfish and cold blooded disregard for the safety of your family. <o></o>

isadore;1757194 wrote: Gosh a ruddies I guess you have a problem sending replies or you felt some psychological need to repeat your defense of the indefensible. You can twist and turn all you want, play whatever word game you wish, you made the choice to put human beings on the same level as killer dogs and that choice defined you as a person. Hopefully you have removed any pit bull from your residence. If not you have shown a selfish and cold blooded disregard for the safety of your family. <o></o>

Al Bundy;1757198 wrote:Are you more likely to be killed by a dog or a human?

isadore;1757201 wrote:the fact that human kill more humans than cobras do, is not a good argument for bringing cobras into your home.

Al Bundy;1757219 wrote:So you shouldn't bring a pit bull, cobra, or black guy into your house because they might kill you?

isadore;1757223 wrote:gosh a ruddies just like otrap lumping human beings with killer animals

Al Bundy;1757226 wrote:So, you are ok with the humans that kill but get upset with the 27 pit bull killings in a year?

isadore;1757230 wrote:the animals were breed to kill, humans were not.

Al Bundy;1757233 wrote:A human in the United States has a much greater chance of being killed by another human than by a dog.

isadore;1757194 wrote:Gosh a ruddies I guess you have a problem sending replies or you felt some psychological need to repeat your defense of the indefensible.

isadore;1757194 wrote:You can twist and turn all you want, play whatever word game you wish

isadore;1757194 wrote:you made the choice to put human beings on the same level as killer dogs and that choice defined you as a person.

isadore;1757194 wrote:Hopefully you have removed any pit bull from your residence. If not you have shown a selfish and cold blooded disregard for the safety of your family. <o></o>

isadore;1757244 wrote:we are foolish to keep an animal breed to kill among us.

O-Trap;1757246 wrote:Nope. I just figured that maybe you would be able to understand if it was broken down into smaller pieces for you. Sadly, it appears your irrational beliefs remain.



Those "word games" have a name. They're commonly referred to as "logic." You should look into it. I think it could help you. A lot.



Nope. I never did. Only you did that.



Quite the contrary. I've only shown that I don't feed into fear-mongering, irrational stereotypes. You, on the other hand ...

Obviously holding the prejudices you have against humans and for killer dogs has atrophied your brain. You were unable to realize that 222# and 223 are almost exactly the same set of ravings. Much of 223# a word for word copy of 222#. It is not logic to equate animals with humans as you have done but an example of the same sophistry as used by Nazis against the Jews. You used it against a race.<o></o>

O-Trap;1757247 wrote:It's not a breed.

Also, it was bred to fight and work. It wasn't necessary for it to kill, so it wasn't actually bred to kill.

isadore;1757314 wrote: They were bred to kill.

Al Bundy;1757319 wrote:Since very few of them kill, the breeders did a poor job.