And once again sleeper lines up directly with reality.like_that;1796489 wrote:Lol sleeper was saying kyrie was a top 3 pg in the league.
Such Sleeper hottaek aligning with reality. :rolleyes::rolleyes:sleeper;1796491 wrote:And once again sleeper lines up directly with reality.
sleeper;1777773 wrote:I hope Love is traded tomorrow. Dude is straight trash.
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?46663-2015-Cleveland-Cavaliers-Regular-season&p=1778016&viewfull=1#post1778016sleeper;1778016 wrote:Reality happened. Kevin Love hasn't done SHIT in Cleveland. Needs to be traded if the Cavs want to win a title. Griffin knows too and is already looking to move him.
sleeper;1778105 wrote:It's going to be tough to find any team that would take Love especially since he has underproduced with his massive contract. We are stuck with him unless a miracle happens.
Also, not a fan of Lue as a coach. Blatt may have not been the answer but I have no faith in Lue as of yet. He's an unproven liability at this point.
sleeper;1778269 wrote:There's no chance Love ever "turns it around".
Hopefully he is traded by the end of the year. We all know Lebron asked Griffin to move him and Blatt wanted Love gone too.
Lol pwned.Commander of Awesome;1796492 wrote:Such Sleeper hottaek aligning with reality. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?46663-2015-Cleveland-Cavaliers-Regular-season&p=1777773&viewfull=1#post1777773
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?46663-2015-Cleveland-Cavaliers-Regular-season&p=1778016&viewfull=1#post1778016
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?46663-2015-Cleveland-Cavaliers-Regular-season&p=1778269&viewfull=1#post1778269
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?46663-2015-Cleveland-Cavaliers-Regular-season&p=1778105&viewfull=1#post1778105
So true, LBJ hates Love.sleeper;1796496 wrote: If the Cavs don't win the championship, he is 100% gone.
Nice sleeper tactic. Double down with the hot take and even gives himself an out (if they don't win a title) to boot. Well done sleeper.sleeper;1796496 wrote:I still stand by the statements that I've made. Love was playing awful and will likely be in the trade market no matter what happens at the end of the year. If the Cavs don't win the championship, he is 100% gone.
Nice try though.
Doesn't matter if they like each other or not. Love is the scapegoat on this team and will be in the trade market no matter what happens. If the Cavs lose, he is gone. Book it and bank it.Commander of Awesome;1796497 wrote:So true, LBJ hates Love.
Picture proof, this photo is from today.
Why wouldn't I back my own statements? I'll triple down on any statement if needed because I know most of the time I will be 100% correct on my assessment.like_that;1796498 wrote:Nice sleeper tactic. Double down with the hot take and even gives himself an out (if they don't win a title) to boot. Well done sleeper.
So now you are patting yourself on your back for a participation trophy? That's not very sleeper like you.sleeper;1796499 wrote:I won't waste my time going back through old posts though. Again, I am the only on here that actually makes predictions and my predictions come true most of the time. I guess everyone would prefer to just toe the line and stay neutral on any future thoughts.
That's fine. Mediocre people never take risks; I've come to accept that mediocrity is the dominant strategy in today's society. Enjoy!
When I'm wrong I will admit it and I have done such in the past.like_that;1796503 wrote:So now you are patting yourself on your back for a participation trophy? That's not very sleeper like you.
The point is don't try and act like you are never wrong, when that's clearly not the case.
60% of the time it works every time.sleeper;1796502 wrote:I know most of the time I will be 100% correct
Once again, none of my statements were "being wrong". They are all valid statements and they still remain valid statements. Sorry that the reality doesn't align with your agenda of proving me wrong. It's entirely laughable the animosity this forum has for me. It's fine though, I'm quite used to the masses not liking me for various reasons.like_that;1796510 wrote:Just to recap for those who want the tl;dr version:
1. Sleeper brags about always being right.
2. Coa provides three quick examples of sleeper being wrong.
3. Sleeper then pats himself for mediocrity by glorifying himself for making predictions, while making fun of others for mediocrity.
4. Sleeper gets called out by me for patting himself on the back for mediocrity, while also missing the point that he was called out for claiming he is always right. Nobody gave himself shit for being wrong in general.
5. Sleeper avoids the argument by patting himself on the back some more for mediocrity.
6. Sleeper caps off rant with one of his trademark closing remarks (enjoy!, grow up!, please tell me more..., reality!, etc). In this case it was "enjoy!"
At being right 60% of the time that still puts me at the best on this forum. No one on here knows as much about basketball as I do and I think I've proven that.SportsAndLady;1796512 wrote:60% of the time it works every time.
I have nothing against you. You know that. Don't be so defensive. Just take the L and move on.sleeper;1796513 wrote:Once again, none of my statements were "being wrong". They are all valid statements and they still remain valid statements. Sorry that the reality doesn't align with your agenda of proving me wrong. It's entirely laughable the animosity this forum has for me. It's fine though, I'm quite used to the masses not liking me for various reasons.
I guess we should just go back to complaining about the refs missing calls here and there.
I'll take the L when it is deserved. Pulling 4 month old posts talking about how poorly Kevin Love has been playing and that he should be traded is still valid. I'm still holding on to the fact that we should have never traded Wiggins for Love; Am I wrong there?like_that;1796515 wrote:I have nothing against you. You know that. Don't be so defensive. Just take the L and move on.
I haven't searched a link, but it is on richard jefferson's snapchat story.slingshot4ever;1796521 wrote:Link????
In my opinion, yes. This team would not be better with Wiggins over Love, short-term or long-term. While I disagree with your opinions about earlier in the year, this is the only thing that I truly feel is wrong.sleeper;1796516 wrote:I'm still holding on to the fact that we should have never traded Wiggins for Love; Am I wrong there?
