robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 19, 2015 5:27pm
Looked to me like it was wide right and under the rim when he touched it, would have to see it again.wildcats20;1714765 wrote:Because it was going to hit the rim, which means it would have been in the cylinder.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Mar 19, 2015 5:29pm
Hey, I've got New Mexico St. over Kansasreclegend22;1714761 wrote:SMU loses on a game-winning goal tend. Lol, I have seen it all. This is the most ridiculous tournament I've seen yet. A one seed is going down this year...
Those two 14-seeds blow my mind - didn't Iowa St and Baylor have most of their guys back from last year's tourney teams?
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 19, 2015 5:30pm
Definitely wasn't wide. It would've definitely grazed the rim. Bottom line though, you can't touch the ball there.robj55;1714767 wrote:Looked to me like it was wide right and under the rim when he touched it, would have to see it again.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Mar 19, 2015 5:30pm
I agreed with you at first glance, then I saw a replay. Definite goal tend.robj55;1714767 wrote:Looked to me like it was wide right and under the rim when he touched it, would have to see it again.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 19, 2015 5:30pm
Scott must have played in the worst league in the country to be a HS All American.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 19, 2015 5:31pm
Yeah I only saw one angle.superman;1714775 wrote:I agreed with you at first glance, then I saw a replay. Definite goal tend.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 19, 2015 5:31pm
Same here. I had to see it a few times.superman;1714775 wrote:I agreed with you at first glance, then I saw a replay. Definite goal tend.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Mar 19, 2015 5:32pm
Headed home from work now.
Hoping OSU comes back.
We'll probably be down by 20+. :-/
Hoping OSU comes back.
We'll probably be down by 20+. :-/
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Mar 19, 2015 5:32pm
LOOKED like it was going to hit the rim...maybe too close to make that call there on that poor of a shot. They still had their chance to win, but that's a damn tough call to make.robj55;1714767 wrote:Looked to me like it was wide right and under the rim when he touched it, would have to see it again.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Mar 19, 2015 5:32pm
The angle from where the shooter is makes it pretty obvious.robj55;1714777 wrote:Yeah I only saw one angle.
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Mar 19, 2015 5:33pm
Ohio State looks terrible. They have no idea how to play against that VCU D at all, you have to move the ball in the half court and hit jumpers, not take it right to them
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Mar 19, 2015 5:35pm
You mean to tell me that having an offense that can move the ball and makes shots is good?Classyposter58;1714783 wrote:you have to move the ball in the half court and hit jumpers
Brilliant.
Next you'll tell us that not turning over the ball and scoring TD's is critical to winning in football!
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Mar 19, 2015 5:37pm
Or I'll take Russell getting wet and we got a game!!!
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Mar 19, 2015 5:41pm
Section 34. Goaltending
Art. 1. Goaltending shall have occurred when a defensive player touches the ball during a field-goal try and each of the following conditions is met: Exceptions: Rules 10-3.6; 10-6.1.i
a. The ball is in its downward flight; and
b. The entire ball is above the level of the ring and has the possibility, while in flight, of entering the basket and is not touching the cylinder.
Art. 1. Goaltending shall have occurred when a defensive player touches the ball during a field-goal try and each of the following conditions is met: Exceptions: Rules 10-3.6; 10-6.1.i
a. The ball is in its downward flight; and
b. The entire ball is above the level of the ring and has the possibility, while in flight, of entering the basket and is not touching the cylinder.
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Mar 19, 2015 5:42pm
Bottom line, that was not goaltending considering the ball had 0% chance of entering the basket.
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Mar 19, 2015 5:43pm
Well sometimes you have offenses where the PG is dominant ball handler and everything comes off him which is what OSU was doing early opposed to running an offense with some flowFly4Fun;1714784 wrote:You mean to tell me that having an offense that can move the ball and makes shots is good?
Brilliant.
Next you'll tell us that not turning over the ball and scoring TD's is critical to winning in football!
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Mar 19, 2015 5:43pm
Looking at the above angle, it WAS going to hit the cylinder.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 19, 2015 5:46pm
Which gives it a chance to go in.Azubuike24;1714789 wrote:Looking at the above angle, it WAS going to hit the cylinder.
There is no way to say it had 0% chance of going in.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 19, 2015 5:52pm
100% that ball was not going in.wildcats20;1714790 wrote:Which gives it a chance to go in.
There is no way to say it had 0% chance of going in.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Mar 19, 2015 5:52pm
Art. 2. Basket interferenceTerry_Tate;1714786 wrote:Section 34. Goaltending
Art. 1. Goaltending shall have occurred when a defensive player touches the ball during a field-goal try and each of the following conditions is met: Exceptions: Rules 10-3.6; 10-6.1.i
a. The ball is in its downward flight; and
b. The entire ball is above the level of the ring and has the possibility, while in flight, of entering the basket and is not touching the cylinder.
a. Basket interference occurs when a player:
1. Touches the ball or any part of the basket while the ball is on or within
the basket;
2. Touches the ball while any part of it is within the cylinder that has the
ring as its lower base;
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Mar 19, 2015 5:54pm
NCAA official on trying to justify the call..."it has a chance to go in" Bull-crapwildcats20;1714790 wrote:Which gives it a chance to go in.
There is no way to say it had 0% chance of going in.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Mar 19, 2015 5:55pm
No way, it MAY have grazed the rim on the far side, but there is a 0% chance of that shot going in.gut;1714794 wrote:NCAA official on trying to justify the call..."it has a chance to go in" Bull-crap
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Mar 19, 2015 5:56pm
Xavier running Ole Miss out of the gym.
M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Mar 19, 2015 6:21pm
But it was in the cylinder which is the other criteria for goal tending. Good call. Stupid play by the goal tender.Terry_Tate;1714787 wrote:Bottom line, that was not goaltending considering the ball had 0% chance of entering the basket.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Mar 19, 2015 6:28pm
How do you let someone hit 4 straight threes without contesting any of them?