Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
May 18, 2016 3:30pm
I sure hope so .....sleeper;1796162 wrote:DOes it really matter? HC is the nominee. Bernie is just a waste of time.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/05/18/13-minutes-of-video-that-show-why-hillary-clinton-isnt-unbeatable-in-the-general-election/
Spock
Posts: 2,853
May 18, 2016 6:55pm
QuakerOats;1796245 wrote:I sure hope so .....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/05/18/13-minutes-of-video-that-show-why-hillary-clinton-isnt-unbeatable-in-the-general-election/
Did she really fart at the end of that?
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
May 19, 2016 10:15am
She's down 5 in latest poll. Perhaps overcoming her criminal background will be more challenging than her supporters thought.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
May 19, 2016 4:36pm
I don't think that's it. Trying to quelch Bernie is making her display a stance of "I'm just as left as he is!" which is kinda turning off her more sane, middle of the road, democratic supporters. The average democrat, in my opinion, doesn't want to go THAT far left. But that's what she is doing in order to stay ahead - steal back voters from Bernie.QuakerOats;1796314 wrote:She's down 5 in latest poll. Perhaps overcoming her criminal background will be more challenging than her supporters thought.
Apple
Posts: 2,620
May 19, 2016 9:29pm
Trump has seen a bounce in his favor since becoming the presumptive nominee with Cruz, et al, voters realizing he will be the man facing HRC. It's likely HRC will see a similar bounce once she has gotten the nomination.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
May 20, 2016 10:32am
She might, but if you not supporting her because she is a crook, what is going to change that next month.
MontyBrunswick
Posts: 846
May 20, 2016 3:51pm
hillary is by far the most qualified. after the email stuff blows over she will win by 30%
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
May 20, 2016 3:55pm
Based on what, exactly? Decades of scandal and unremarkable achievement?MontyBrunswick;1796504 wrote:hillary is by far the most qualified. after the email stuff blows over she will win by 30%
She has some things in common with Ted Cruz - outspoken but seemingly attempting, much less accomplishing, very little other than to advance her political career.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 20, 2016 3:57pm
he's a troll.gut;1796506 wrote:Based on what, exactly? Decades of scandal and unremarkable achievement?
She has some things in common with Ted Cruz - outspoken but seemingly attempting, much less accomplishing, very little other than to advance her political career.
MontyBrunswick
Posts: 846
May 21, 2016 10:59am
Decades of experience.gut;1796506 wrote:Based on what, exactly? Decades of scandal and unremarkable achievement?
B
BoatShoes
Posts: 5,703
May 21, 2016 12:08pm
Gut only cares about experience when he can complain about Obama having none.MontyBrunswick;1796564 wrote:Decades of experience.
Can't believe he's not going to secretly vote for Hillary. She's the only thing close to an establishment Republican left in the race.
B
BoatShoes
Posts: 5,703
May 21, 2016 12:10pm
She passed the State Children's Health Insurance Program with a Republican Congress after being defeated on HillaryCare. The exact sort of thing you claim you would want Obama to do.gut;1796506 wrote:Based on what, exactly? Decades of scandal and unremarkable achievement?
She has some things in common with Ted Cruz - outspoken but seemingly attempting, much less accomplishing, very little other than to advance her political career.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
May 21, 2016 2:01pm
LMFAO. That's all you got after a career spanning decades? And that was as First Lady - did she do anything as a Senator or Sec State?BoatShoes;1796577 wrote:She passed the State Children's Health Insurance Program with a Republican Congress after being defeated on HillaryCare. The exact sort of thing you claim you would want Obama to do.
Yeah, she's experienced alright. And based on that experience, we know she is an ineffective leader.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
May 21, 2016 7:02pm
She jailed the perpetrator of the Benghazi attack and confiscated his video camera.gut;1796582 wrote:LMFAO. That's all you got after a career spanning decades? And that was as First Lady - did she do anything as a Senator or Sec State?
Yeah, she's experienced alright. And based on that experience, we know she is an ineffective leader.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
May 23, 2016 8:30am
Hillary Clinton blasting Trump for pandering to the gun lobby while at a specifically targeted audience of Trayvon Martin Foundation's Circle of Mothers event. $1,500 per plate to attend this event, all donated to the foundation.
Oh, the irony...
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article79108402.html
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article79108402.html#storylink=cpy
Oh, the irony...
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article79108402.html
“Unlike Trump I will not pander to the gun lobby,” Clinton said.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article79108402.html#storylink=cpy
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
May 23, 2016 4:32pm
She raked in over $21 million in just the two-year period Apr '13 - Apr '15 from banks and corps in speaking fees.
Absolutely incredible.
And on top of that you have the clinton foundation slush fund, laundering tens of millions continuously.
She is perhaps the most disgusting criminal phony in political history.
Absolutely incredible.
And on top of that you have the clinton foundation slush fund, laundering tens of millions continuously.
She is perhaps the most disgusting criminal phony in political history.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 23, 2016 5:15pm
That's just what they pay!QuakerOats;1796778 wrote:She raked in over $21 million in just the two-year period Apr '13 - Apr '15 from banks and corps in speaking fees.
Absolutely incredible.
And on top of that you have the clinton foundation slush fund, laundering tens of millions continuously.
She is perhaps the most disgusting criminal phony in political history.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
May 23, 2016 5:37pm
And supposedly another $26M from Slick Willy in that time frame, meaning they hauled in nearly $50M in two years ahead of the Presidential run.
But I'm sure people just really wanted to hear what they had to say, and this isn't blatant bribery by any stretch.
But I'm sure people just really wanted to hear what they had to say, and this isn't blatant bribery by any stretch.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
May 24, 2016 10:02am
I see one of her partners in crime, Terry Mcauliffe (VA gov.) is now under federal investigation also (as he should be; he is one of the most despicable sob's in politics). They run in a nice crowd; hope they go down in flames soon.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 25, 2016 1:39pm
Thoughts on the State Departments investigation report released today?
Anyone starting to think she'll eventually be indicted? Or will she continue to skirt by with no negative action against her?
Anyone starting to think she'll eventually be indicted? Or will she continue to skirt by with no negative action against her?
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 25, 2016 1:43pm
I doubt anything happens with this. She's probably the most corrupt politician in the country and has the back of wealthy people.SportsAndLady;1796995 wrote:Thoughts on the State Departments investigation report released today?
Anyone starting to think she'll eventually be indicted? Or will she continue to skirt by with no negative action against her?
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 25, 2016 1:46pm
I just love her people's responses. "This is what SoS's did! It's not like she's the first one to do this!sleeper;1796996 wrote:I doubt anything happens with this. She's probably the most corrupt politician in the country and has the back of wealthy people.
So fucking what? Still illegal what she was doing. Who cares that her predecessors did the same things? Why does that make it okay?
W
wkfan
Posts: 1,641
May 25, 2016 2:32pm
This.SportsAndLady;1796995 wrote:Anyone starting to think she'll eventually be indicted? Or will she continue to skirt by with no negative action against her?
The Clinton's are teflon.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
May 25, 2016 3:12pm
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/hillary-clinton-personal-email-worry-223559
She did not cooperate with the IG.
She did not want personal emails to be seen by State Dept.
Criminal bitch.
She did not cooperate with the IG.
She did not want personal emails to be seen by State Dept.
Criminal bitch.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 25, 2016 5:35pm
Potentially more bad news for Hillary.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/281211-hacker-guccifer-pleads-guilty
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/281211-hacker-guccifer-pleads-guilty