...and now her campaign chairman's twitter account appears to have been hacked....unless of course he's really switched teams and is now voting for Mr. Trump.

Regardless of political affiliation, I have a basic problem with these hacked emails being held against anyone. I don't believe any campaign would look good if all of the confidential email traffic of its players were published. Hell, I wouldn't look good if every emails I've ever sent came out. Just like I don't hold this recording of Trump against him, I think this email hack stuff is dirty pool and I disregard it. Let's not forget that Julian Assange is not our friend. He is a cyber terrorist and an enemy to this country.

Dr Winston O'Boogie;1815425 wrote:... Let's not forget that Julian Assange is not our friend. He is a cyber terrorist and an enemy to this country.

I completely agree with this.

Dr Winston O'Boogie;1815425 wrote:Regardless of political affiliation, I have a basic problem with these hacked emails being held against anyone. I don't believe any campaign would look good if all of the confidential email traffic of its players were published. Hell, I wouldn't look good if every emails I've ever sent came out. Just like I don't hold this recording of Trump against him, I think this email hack stuff is dirty pool and I disregard it. Let's not forget that Julian Assange is not our friend. He is a cyber terrorist and an enemy to this country.

If this were 10+ years ago, I would probably agree with you. The older I get the more I realize the government is not held accountable except for their smaller chess pieces. Thus I don't find myself getting upset with what Assange is doing. At least somebody is holding them accountable.

like_that;1815427 wrote:If this were 10+ years ago, I would probably agree with you. The older I get the more I realize the government is not held accountable except for their smaller chess pieces. Thus I don't find myself getting upset with what Assange is doing. At least somebody is holding them accountable.

I agree. Further though, Assange is revealing that Clinton appears to be an enemy to this country; how ironic.

like_that;1815427 wrote:If this were 10+ years ago, I would probably agree with you. The older I get the more I realize the government is not held accountable except for their smaller chess pieces. Thus I don't find myself getting upset with what Assange is doing. At least somebody is holding them accountable.

This is where I am at as well. But as yet they have not been held to account. The chief perpetrator Hillary is about to be elected to the highest office on the country and the people being exposed in these emails will be be rewarded with great political power.

Similarly, when she is exposed on her email criminality, she responds "I take full responsibility for it". Well big fucking deal; what the hell does that mean. Was she fired: no. Was she reprimanded: no. Was she fined: no. Was she demoted: hell no. Was she put on probation: no. Was she stripped of security clearance: no. Was she censured: no. Was she admonished: no. Was her pension forfeited: no.

Not only was there zero penalty; there is absolutely zero accountability!! Responsibility means absolutely nothing!! In fact, she is being potentially elevated to the highest position in the land (while a Marine who did almost nothing is currently being sent to jail).

The next time she says "I take full responsibility" somebody should say, 'BULLSHIT, like hell you do'. What a deceitful, corrupt, phony.

QuakerOats;1815431 wrote:I agree. Further though, Assange is revealing that Clinton appears to be an enemy to this country; how ironic.

Question: do you wake up in the middle of the night screaming BENGHAZI!!!, or is it more like you roll around in your sleep while muttering Benghazi and Clinton under your breath all night?

- Were you as upset about the embassy attacks and deaths under the Bush administration as you are about Benghazi?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...benghazi-were-there-13-attacks-embassies-and/

What I wonder about is how anyone could support a person to be commander-in-chief who is completely incompetent, whose record abroad is .000; and who deliberately lied directly to the families whose family members were killed because of her stupidity, ineptness, and political ambitions, in an attempt to cover up all her failings.

QuakerOats;1815453 wrote:Similarly, when she is exposed on her email criminality, she responds "I take full responsibility for it". Well big fucking deal; what the hell does that mean. Was she fired: no. Was she reprimanded: no. Was she fined: no. Was she demoted: hell no. Was she put on probation: no. Was she stripped of security clearance: no. Was she censured: no. Was she admonished: no. Was her pension forfeited: no.

Not only was there zero penalty; there is absolutely zero accountability!! Responsibility means absolutely nothing!! In fact, she is being potentially elevated to the highest position in the land (while a Marine who did almost nothing is currently being sent to jail).

The next time she says "I take full responsibility" somebody should say, 'BULLSHIT, like hell you do'. What a deceitful, corrupt, phony.

At least Nixon had the balls to resign for the betterment of the country

Yes, he did. He looks like an altar boy compared to Hillary. The corruption and criminality of the Clintons dwarfs Watergate by nearly immeasurable exponential magnitude.

What is funny is that the dems think they are getting another 4 years of Obama and she is going to wipe out everything he did.

Spock;1815524 wrote:What is funny is that the dems think they are getting another 4 years of Obama and she is going to wipe out everything he did.

Oh? She is? Source?

Commander of Awesome;1815525 wrote:Oh? She is? Source?

Please....pay attention. Hilary doesn't want to extend a legacy that isn't hers. She doesn't want Obama care....she wants hilarycare. She wants open border amnesty.

Spock;1815528 wrote:Please....pay attention. Hilary doesn't want to extend a legacy that isn't hers. She doesn't want Obama care....she wants hilarycare. She wants open border amnesty.

So you dont because you made it up. ok.

Spock;1815528 wrote:Please....pay attention. Hilary doesn't want to extend a legacy that isn't hers. She doesn't want Obama care....she wants hilarycare. She wants open border amnesty.

She wants hemispheric open borders, as she told the bankers in Brazil (privately of course) in return for $400,000 for Bill's speech, and then $250,000 for her speech. (Frankly she should sue these Brazilians for discrimination in speaking fees). She is completely willing to refuse to defend the United States of America. She is selling out the U.S. in return for personal enrichment. It is simply staggering what we are learning about this criminal; but because the media and democrat party are each other, all we hear about is dirty talk. Supporting her is tantamount to treason.

Commander of Awesome;1815534 wrote:So you dont because you made it up. ok.

everyone knows this.....she has even said that she wants it. Just play along and act like you know what is going on.

http://therightscoop.com/wikileaks-emails-reveals-hillary-campaign-pushing-muslim-obama-narrative/

Hillary authoring the obama-is-a-muslim narrative ..................she is such a despicable liar.

QuakerOats;1815629 wrote:http://therightscoop.com/wikileaks-emails-reveals-hillary-campaign-pushing-muslim-obama-narrative/

Hillary authoring the obama-is-a-muslim narrative ..................she is such a despicable liar.

If Clinton lied about this, that means Obama isn't a Muslim. If Obama is a Muslim, that means many Republicans have been following her script.

Pretty sure a good portion of the Trumpster Divers I know would develop an aneurysm upon having to make that choice.

The lie is her saying she had no involvement in this particular instance of 'candidate destruction'.

Whether obama is a muslim or not, or a sympathizer or not, is not the point. Although it is strange that that is still up for debate.

QuakerOats;1815638 wrote:The lie is her saying she had no involvement in this particular instance of 'candidate destruction'.

Whether obama is a muslim or not, or a sympathizer or not, is not the point. Although it is strange that that is still up for debate.

Why would she lie about it if it was true and supported?

It sounds like an embellishment the way it reads.

QuakerOats;1815629 wrote:http://therightscoop.com/wikileaks-emails-reveals-hillary-campaign-pushing-muslim-obama-narrative/

Hillary authoring the obama-is-a-muslim narrative ..................she is such a despicable liar.

She is a liar absolutely. She also may be the most corrupt politician ever to run for President.

We get it. The public gets it; still better than Trump.

sleeper;1815647 wrote:She is a liar absolutely. She also may be the most corrupt politician ever to run for President.

We get it. The public gets it; still better than Trump.

I don't know if they really do.

like_that;1815650 wrote:I don't know if they really do.

They get it but they aren't going to admit it publicly.

Even my super liberal, hardcore HRC fans have admitted to me they aren't a huge fan of HRC as a person. They are voting for her because they are Democrats; plain and simple.

sleeper;1815671 wrote:They get it but they aren't going to admit it publicly.

Even my super liberal, hardcore HRC fans have admitted to me they aren't a huge fan of HRC as a person. They are voting for her because they are Democrats; plain and simple.

Same here, but these are educated people.