O-Trap;1815644 wrote:Why would she lie about it if it was true and supported?

Am I not writing in English?

She denies associating obama with being a muslim; yet she plotted and did exactly that. She is a liar.

QuakerOats;1815678 wrote:Am I not writing in English?

She denies associating obama with being a muslim; yet she plotted and did exactly that. She is a liar.

Who said she isn't a liar? Certainly not me. She is one.

Perhaps I'm not speaking clearly. I'm asking WHY she would lie about starting that ball rolling if it was true. Does one lie about telling the truth? Maybe out of fear, but I daresay the Clintons have had little to fear for quite some time.

Since we know she's a liar, and since an obvious motive would be to lie about lying, it's likely that it was, in fact, a lie.

As such, yes. She is a liar. Many times over.

Maybe she originally thought it might be true about him, in which case her strategy of associating him as such might pay her even greater dividends. But again, that is not the point, the lie is saying she never was attempting to paint him as a muslim. Whether he was or wasn't is irrelevant.

O-Trap;1815685 wrote:As such, yes. She is a liar. Many times over.

Yeah, but she is the most qualified person to ever run for president.

QuakerOats;1815687 wrote:Whether he was or wasn't is irrelevant.

I certainly agree with this.

QuakerOats;1815688 wrote:Yeah, but she is the most qualified person to ever run for president.

You know, I've heard very few people who actually believe this. On one hand, I'm happy to know that. On the other, I'm saddened by the fact that so many still seem to think she's a viable option.

Which flunky gets to win the election before failing as a president?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/20/clinton-server-email-at-heart-quid-pro-quo-controversy-contained-benghazi-intel.html


More damning by the hour.

She should be disqualified immediately.

QuakerOats;1817410 wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/20/clinton-server-email-at-heart-quid-pro-quo-controversy-contained-benghazi-intel.html


More damning by the hour.

She should be disqualified immediately.

I think everyone on this sight knows where you stand...you find her despicable. That's fair. I think many people voting for her are like me. We'll be holding our noses while pulling the lever. As bad as she is, I don't believe she will come close to the burrito-diarrhea mess a Trump administration would be.

Hey, some people have difficulty dealing with reality - the delivering of bad news and dealing in a forthright manner with problems and challenges. I get that.

QuakerOats;1817450 wrote:Hey, some people have difficulty dealing with reality - the delivering of bad news and dealing in a forthright manner with problems and challenges. I get that.

gosh a ruddies I have some reality for you to deal with, there is a very good chance that in January, 2017 Hillary Clinton will become the first female President of the United States. That maybe bad news for you, but it is good news for the country given the one alternative available.

Not sure how long the cover-up can continue …….the most massive corruption in US political history.


http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/20/wikileaks-hillary-got-12-million-for-clinton-charity-as-quid-pro-quo-for-morocco-meeting/

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/hacked-emails-clinton-pushed-charity-meeting-morocco-42947113

http://www.westernjournalism.com/hillary-clinton-pay-for-play-12-million-offer-from-moroccan-king/

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/hillary%E2%80%99s-top-assistant-huma-abedin-admits-to-a-12-million-dollar-pay-for-play-from-morocco.110889/

Dr Winston O'Boogie;1817417 wrote:I think everyone on this sight knows where you stand...you find her despicable. That's fair. I think many people voting for her are like me. We'll be holding our noses while pulling the lever. As bad as she is, I don't believe she will come close to the burrito-diarrhea mess a Trump administration would be.

This has been said probably 1,000x on this forum since it got down to Trump vs. Clinton.

I'd happily vote for anyone in the GOP not named Cruz/Trump for President over Clinton. GOP chose Trump; my vote goes to Clinton.

isadore;1817468 wrote:gosh a ruddies I have some reality for you to deal with, there is a very good chance that in January, 2017 Hillary Clinton will become the first female President of the United States. That maybe bad news for you, but it is good news for the country given the one alternative available.

Agreed. I'm ready for our First Female President.

From the Washington Times

Hillary Clinton has aligned herself closely with a vision for America laid out by her benefactor — left-wing financier George Soros, who talks of “international governance,” more open borders, increased Muslim immigration and diminished U.S. global power.
The phrase “American exceptionalism” is not part of his agenda. He wrote in 1998: “The sovereignty of states must be subordinated to international law and international institutions.”
“We need some global system of political decision-making. In short, we need a global society to support our global economy,” Mr. Soros wrote.



And yet she stares into the camera and lies directly at you. She is an enemy of state.

QO I've got to ask, what is your agenda here? I do disagree with you but I'm not questioning your right to hold your own political beliefs or even to come here and copy/paste a bunch of links. I'm more curious about why? If you're trying to raise awareness and be a voice for your way of political thought I'm not sure a forum on a low traffic message board is the the most effective use of your time. I'm actually more baffled by the thought process of "oh this article really hits Hillary hard I better go share it on the OC" than I am by your political leanings. I know tone is hard to pick up in writing so I assure you I'm not being condescending I'm genuinely curious what you get out of this. It seems an exercise in futility and frustration. Just trying to understand something that makes no sense to me.

What her campaign really thinks of Bernie

January 2016 email from Podesta discusses Bernie Sanders’ healthcare plan. “His actual proposal sucks, but we live in a leftie alternative universe,” Podesta writes in an email to Judd Legum, editor at ThinkProgress.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

rocketalum;1817601 wrote:QO I've got to ask, what is your agenda here? I do disagree with you but I'm not questioning your right to hold your own political beliefs or even to come here and copy/paste a bunch of links. I'm more curious about why? If you're trying to raise awareness and be a voice for your way of political thought I'm not sure a forum on a low traffic message board is the the most effective use of your time. I'm actually more baffled by the thought process of "oh this article really hits Hillary hard I better go share it on the OC" than I am by your political leanings. I know tone is hard to pick up in writing so I assure you I'm not being condescending I'm genuinely curious what you get out of this. It seems an exercise in futility and frustration. Just trying to understand something that makes no sense to me.

I don't get anything out of this. I recognize that the mainstream media and the democrat party are one and the same, and as a result there is a boatload of critical information that never reaches the public, that should. There is also a boatload of policies and laws and rules that have been churned out by the radical obama regime that are crippling industry and small business in general, which then in turn has damaging effects on the economy and middle class America. I am just trying to help get information and commentary into the hands of people who will hopefully find it useful, and perhaps educational. I think we as a nation are quickly heading for trouble unless we face reality, and change course. I think we all have a duty to stay attuned to what is occurring and hold everyone in government accountable; God knows the media has completely abdicated their duty to do so. I appreciate your question.

Thanks for taking the time to reply. It still seems like a bit of banging your head against the wall, and your politics are too for right for my center left tastes, but I can respect the principled place that you're coming from. We can agree on the fact that the media has abdicated its responsibility to hold those in power accountable and traded honesty and fairness for access. I suppose a downside to a free and independent press is that it's free to be in the tank for one group over another.

rocketalum;1817601 wrote:If you're trying to raise awareness and be a voice for your way of political thought I'm not sure a forum on a low traffic message board is the the most effective use of your time.

I can't be the only one who lol'd at this

Unfortunately the media is in the tank for BIG government too, and thus its encroachment on freedom continues unabated. I am not too optimistic about where we are headed.

QuakerOats;1817689 wrote:Unfortunately the media is in the tank for BIG government too, and thus its encroachment on freedom continues unabated. I am not too optimistic about where we are headed.

You give the left-leaning media way, way, way too much credit. Plus you ignore that there is a lot of right-leaning media as well.

Most of us knew the media was in bed with the democrats. The wikileaks emphatically prove that the media and the democrats are actually one and the same; unbridled corruption at the highest levels.

Dr Winston O'Boogie;1817692 wrote:You give the left-leaning media way, way, way too much credit. Plus you ignore that there is a lot of right-leaning media as well.

Except when he posts links to them while pretending they're valid. He's cute that way. A raging hypocrite, but cute.

QuakerOats;1817700 wrote:Most of us knew the media was in bed with the democrats. The wikileaks emphatically prove that the media and the democrats are actually one and the same; unbridled corruption at the highest levels.

What's funny is that the wikileaks emails reveal that it is not even close to as bad as you believe it is and the conservative media says it is but you can't shake the faith of a true believer.

BoatShoes;1817770 wrote:What's funny is that the wikileaks emails reveal that it is not even close to as bad as you believe it is and the conservative media says it is but you can't shake the faith of a true believer.

Delusional. Get in line partisan sheep, you're doing a good job.

gosh a ruddies

Donald Dumbass' antics take the media attention off whatever supposed revelations are generated from the hacks