S
steubbigred
Posts: 1,392
Feb 9, 2015 3:38pm
you want to know the ugly truth . the ugly truth is these filthy cocksuckers have her as a slave.. we must completely destroy raqqa. wipe it off the face of the earth we will kill all those devils and put the people in slavery and being tortured out of their misery...thavoice;1704422 wrote:Yeah..no shit.
SHe very well may be dead, but I highly doubt it was the result of those Jordanian airstrikes.......They are just trying to make a divide.
To be honest....even if those Jordanian strikes did kill her, it shouldnt hinder our resolve to eradicate them from the earth. SHit happens in war, sometimes you kill the good guys, and even if she was killed in airstrike it wont make me go against Jordan being involved in this fight.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Feb 9, 2015 3:59pm
Well that was understood. She was either killed already by them or still alive. Either way, she was a slave to them.steubbigred;1704498 wrote:you want to know the ugly truth . the ugly truth is these filthy cocksuckers have her as a slave.. we must completely destroy raqqa. wipe it off the face of the earth we will kill all those devils and put the people in slavery and being tortured out of their misery...
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Feb 9, 2015 4:57pm
For those that believe the "well Christians did bad things 1000 years ago..."
I don't necessarily agree with the broad statement about Islam on the left, but the Muslim/Moor invasions described on the list on the right that lead up to the Crusades are 100% accurate.
I don't necessarily agree with the broad statement about Islam on the left, but the Muslim/Moor invasions described on the list on the right that lead up to the Crusades are 100% accurate.
S
steubbigred
Posts: 1,392
Feb 9, 2015 4:57pm
yes and it sickens me to no end that a passive person with nothing but good will in her heart could be taken by these animals . this is one time i wish we had one of the bush's or reagan in office and i vote democratic. i would rather be killed by american or jordan bombs than be held slave to these devils they are torturous barbarians and they need liquidated. any son of a bitch who wants to join them needs locked up and thrown in a dungeon.thavoice;1704502 wrote:Well that was understood. She was either killed already by them or still alive. Either way, she was a slave to them.
S
steubbigred
Posts: 1,392
Feb 9, 2015 5:00pm
i wish somebody would stand on a high horse and speak for the free thinking world and lead us into battle against these devils. it isn't our manjmog;1704512 wrote:For those that believe the "well Christians did bad things 1000 years ago..."
I don't necessarily agree with the broad statement about Islam on the left, but the Muslim/Moor invasions described on the list on the right that lead up to the Crusades are 100% accurate.
S
steubbigred
Posts: 1,392
Feb 10, 2015 12:04am
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
TedSheckler
Posts: 3,974
Feb 15, 2015 5:57pm
This again.
S
steubbigred
Posts: 1,392
Feb 15, 2015 6:49pm
do this per hour...........how are we going to eliminate so many of these cocksuckers.....TedSheckler;1705788 wrote:This again.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Feb 15, 2015 7:43pm
60 Minutes tonight segment on jihadist recruitment in France (which is happening in Detroit even more so...) highlights how civilized societies have to start eradicating (yes genocide) of Muslims worldwide. Everyone says that no leadership will ever promote or campaign for such action. I say BS now...I believe a majority of smart people in the US would support a plan to eliminate Islam from the planet.
W
Wolves of Babylon
Posts: 408
Feb 15, 2015 10:07pm
A majority support mass murder, even of innocent people? If this is true then we deserve to be wiped off the planet.Tiernan;1705800 wrote:60 Minutes tonight segment on jihadist recruitment in France (which is happening in Detroit even more so...) highlights how civilized societies have to start eradicating (yes genocide) of Muslims worldwide. Everyone says that no leadership will ever promote or campaign for such action. I say BS now...I believe a majority of smart people in the US would support a plan to eliminate Islam from the planet.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Feb 15, 2015 11:43pm
That is the intent of Islam to wipe out everyone else...so Yes it's a lets get them before they get us thing. Unfortunately it has come to this but it's the only answer.
TedSheckler
Posts: 3,974
Feb 17, 2015 9:04am
JV team on the defensive captures Iraqi town and burns alive 45 people.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-31502863
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-31502863
G
Gardens35
Posts: 4,929
Feb 17, 2015 9:28am
Two well placed EXPLOSIONS would probably decimate the ISIS......the first in Syria, 25 miles or so south of the border with Turkey.....the second in North-Central Iraq, maybe 3 days later.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Feb 17, 2015 9:37am
Probably not.Gardens35;1706123 wrote:Two well placed EXPLOSIONS would probably decimate the ISIS......the first in Syria, 25 miles or so south of the border with Turkey.....the second in North-Central Iraq, maybe 3 days later.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 17, 2015 9:57am
Conservatives: peace through strength.
Liberals: appeasement, then defeat.
Liberals: appeasement, then defeat.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Feb 17, 2015 10:21am
Wrong. Our enemy is ISIS, not fellow Americans who happen to disagree with us politically. We're all Americans after all and these religious fanatics are our common antithesis.QuakerOats;1706129 wrote:Conservatives: peace through strength.
Liberals: appeasement, then defeat.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Feb 17, 2015 10:48am
Examples of this please?QuakerOats;1706129 wrote:Conservatives: peace through strength.
Liberals: appeasement, then defeat.
Catchy, but not accurate. Conflates a lot of things.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Feb 17, 2015 11:22am
QQuakerOats: Moronic slogans that mean nothing.QuakerOats;1706129 wrote:Conservatives: peace through strength.
Liberals: appeasement, then defeat.
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 17, 2015 11:22am
In reality it's more like:
Conservatives: Economic weakness through perpetual war.
Liberals: Economic weakness through perpetual war.
Conservatives: Economic weakness through perpetual war.
Liberals: Economic weakness through perpetual war.
W
wkfan
Posts: 1,641
Feb 17, 2015 11:52am
Sorta like 'Hope and Change'?Heretic;1706159 wrote:QQuakerOats: Moronic slogans that mean nothing.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Feb 17, 2015 12:09pm
Pretty much. About any political slogan, whether it be from a politician's PR campaign or a politard's shit-filled excuse for a brain, tends to be meaningless tripe. Kind of like corporate buzzwords, but on a bigger scale.wkfan;1706166 wrote:Sorta like 'Hope and Change'?
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 17, 2015 1:24pm
Ronald Reagan: fall of USSRptown_trojans_1;1706147 wrote:Examples of this please?
Catchy, but not accurate. Conflates a lot of things.
barack obama: rise of terrorism
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 17, 2015 1:26pm
We agree; I did not say that liberals were the enemy (although in an indirect way I suppose a case could be made for such). My point was to contrast the foundations from which we base our strategy upon.Dr Winston O'Boogie;1706134 wrote:Our enemy is ISIS, not fellow Americans who happen to disagree with us politically. We're all Americans after all and these religious fanatics are our common antithesis.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Feb 17, 2015 1:35pm
The fall of the USSR goes all the way back to George Kennan and the policy of containment and NSC-68.QuakerOats;1706177 wrote:Ronald Reagan: fall of USSR
barack obama: rise of terrorism
Reagan did a nice push, but he also really nearly killed us all in the period of 1981-1983.
Also, it was Carter, during the FY1980 Defense budget start started the push on defense.
And, the rise of terrorism for Obama? Huh? What the hell does that mean? That makes no logical sense when you look at the rise and fall of terrorism as a whole.
Also, OBL dead, and the rise of drone strikes to take out terrorism leaders does not line up to your rhetoric.
Typical Quaker.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Feb 17, 2015 1:41pm
The USSR would have fallen with or without Reagan. It was a failed state destined for destruction.QuakerOats;1706177 wrote:Ronald Reagan: fall of USSR
barack obama: rise of terrorism
Terrorism has been around for thousands of years and will be around for thousands more. Militant Islamic terrorism has been around all through the twentieth and twenty first centuries (including the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing during the Reagan administration). Your way oversimplifying things.