Commander of Awesome;1718256 wrote:The same ihslep you used Offensive wins shares as the main case for Harden to be MVP and thinks FTs are the greatest basketball play.
This post is so full of fail it's hilarious.
My main case was stated here:
lhslep134;1717790 wrote:Your only arguments for him not being top 3 are what? That you don't like his style of play? That he won't go far in the playoffs? Those are pathetically awful arguments man. Not much else to say.
My arguments are well laid out and easily backed by evidence: #1 offensive win shares; #1 overall win shares; #8 defensive win shares; #3 box +/-; #1 value over replacement player....I could go on and on.
As you can read, or in your case, choose to ignore, offensive win shares is unequivocally not my "main case."
To your second bolded point. I didn't say they're the greatest, I said they're the most valuable. Which they are, per
http://nyloncalculus.com/2014/07/21/most-valuable-shot-is-worth-one-point-free-throw/; so you can either acknowledge that or you can be like footwedge and disagree with mathematical conclusions.
So continue your spin cycle routine but anyone with any bit of NBA knowledge sees right through you and your "case." The only one who doesn't is Sleeper who, like I said, is either ignorant to the NBA or feigns ignorance to troll. Either way, not the most convincing guy to have in your corner lol. But hey when you can get someone who doesn't think Draymond Green is good to agree with you, you'll take what you can get amirite?