Archive Titans vs Browns

W

wkfan

Posts: 1,641

Oct 1, 2014 11:27am

SportsAndLady;1659317 wrote:Go ahead and believe that all you want. 75+ drug tests in a year is crazy, I don't care who you are. We don't have convicted felons getting drug tested that many times.

It's pissing into a cup 75 times.

No big deal.

No smoke-y, no snort-y...no fail-y.

Simple

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Oct 1, 2014 11:38am

SportsAndLady;1659317 wrote:Go ahead and believe that all you want. 75+ drug tests in a year is crazy, I don't care who you are. We don't have convicted felons getting drug tested that many times.

Convicted felons don't have the privelege of playing in the NFL. It may be what some consider "excessive" but if the idiot weren't a repeat offender, he wouldn't be pissing in a cup every time he takes a breath.

bases_loaded

Posts: 6,912

Oct 1, 2014 12:15pm

SportsAndLady;1659274 wrote:How do you know they're better with Tate? He has 6 carries lol he's basically played half a game. A half where we got blown the fuck out. Then he was replaced and the team came back lol

Because the holes West ran through weren't going to be there for Tate? I bet Tate doesn't lose 8 yards on a run after a 60 yard pass when you're trying to put a team away. I bet Tate lines up correctly when you're trying to get s first down. The Browns have a great problem and typical Cleveland fan doesn't know how to handle it.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Oct 1, 2014 12:31pm

bases_loaded;1659337 wrote:The Browns have a great problem and typical Cleveland fan doesn't know how to handle it.

Oppose to the non-typical cleveland fan (you), who wants to trade a productive rookie after 3 games? LOL.

Rotinaj

Posts: 7,699

Oct 1, 2014 12:46pm

lol, stop acting like Tate is a top 15 RB in the league. He's a sleightly above average injury prone RB.

F

Footwedge

Posts: 9,265

Oct 1, 2014 12:51pm

Trade any one of the backs to the Colts for their number one pick.

Iliketurtles

Posts: 8,191

Oct 1, 2014 1:19pm

BR1986FB;1659324 wrote:Convicted felons don't have the privelege of playing in the NFL. It may be what some consider "excessive" but if the idiot weren't a repeat offender, he wouldn't be pissing in a cup every time he takes a breath.

Sure they do just ask Michael Vick.

But I do agree that Gordon just need to be quiet and suck it up and take the tests. He has no one else to blame but himself.

bases_loaded

Posts: 6,912

Oct 1, 2014 1:44pm

like_that;1659343 wrote:Oppose to the non-typical cleveland fan (you), who wants to trade a productive rookie after 3 games? LOL.

You wouldn't kick the tires on a trade with the Panthers? They can't even get Fozzy Whitaker to suit up for them. You have 3 capable backs. The lifespan of an NFL RB is what...2 years? Why not try to trade rape a team that is supposed to contend this year when you have an abundance at a position they need?

Anyone have any idea why the reporter asked Pettine about a Justin Hunter trade and who would the Browns be sending them?

Laley23

Posts: 29,506

Oct 1, 2014 1:52pm

bases_loaded;1659337 wrote:Because the holes West ran through weren't going to be there for Tate? I bet Tate doesn't lose 8 yards on a run after a 60 yard pass when you're trying to put a team away. I bet Tate lines up correctly when you're trying to get s first down. The Browns have a great problem and typical Cleveland fan doesn't know how to handle it.

I want Tate to be the starter and prove to be worthy of it as well. But, you even have to admit in some of his soundbites he seems very bitter and upset at the success the rookies are having while he has been out.

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Posts: 2,682

Oct 1, 2014 1:54pm

Footwedge;1659352 wrote:Trade any one of the backs to the Colts for their number one pick.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Oct 1, 2014 2:06pm

bases_loaded;1659365 wrote: Anyone have any idea why the reporter asked Pettine about a Justin Hunter trade and who would the Browns be sending them?

The rumor, which has been squashed, was the Browns sending Crowell to the Tits for Hunter.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Oct 1, 2014 2:09pm

Laley23;1659366 wrote:I want Tate to be the starter and prove to be worthy of it as well. But, you even have to admit in some of his soundbites he seems very bitter and upset at the success the rookies are having while he has been out.

He's embraced the city well, and become a fan favorite in some circumstances, but he's come across as a bitter bitch in several interviews. When he first arrived, he was asked on the radio about his thoughts on Matt Schaub (rumors were floating around that Schaub could end up in Cleveland) and his response sounded like some catty teenage girl.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Oct 1, 2014 2:10pm

Iliketurtles;1659360 wrote:Sure they do just ask Michael Vick.

But I do agree that Gordon just need to be quiet and suck it up and take the tests. He has no one else to blame but himself.

Good point on Vick. Forgot about that POS.

bases_loaded

Posts: 6,912

Oct 1, 2014 2:14pm

BR1986FB;1659378 wrote:The rumor, which has been squashed, was the Browns sending Crowell to the Tits for Hunter.

Meh...I would send the colts 4th to them.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Oct 1, 2014 3:02pm

bases_loaded;1659365 wrote:You wouldn't kick the tires on a trade with the Panthers? They can't even get Fozzy Whitaker to suit up for them. You have 3 capable backs. The lifespan of an NFL RB is what...2 years? Why not try to trade rape a team that is supposed to contend this year when you have an abundance at a position they need?

Anyone have any idea why the reporter asked Pettine about a Justin Hunter trade and who would the Browns be sending them?

No.

You're not going to get anything more than a 3rd rd pick, and any team that is willing to give up a third round pick for another 3rd round rb who only played 3 games is very dumb. Not worth it. I rather keep the two rookies who are on a longer/cheaper contract (as long as they keep showing signs they can play in the NFL) and trade the vet after this season if we are going to trade anybody. RBs are dime a dozen in the NFL, but if you find good RBs for cheap, you might as well keep them.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Oct 1, 2014 3:07pm

like_that;1659407 wrote:No.

You're not going to get anything more than a 3rd rd pick, and any team that is willing to give up a third round pick for another 3rd round rb who only played 3 games is very dumb. Not worth it. I rather keep the two rookies who are on a longer/cheaper contract (as long as they keep showing signs they can play in the NFL) and trade the vet after this season if we are going to trade anybody. RBs are dime a dozen in the NFL, but if you find good RBs for cheap, you might as well keep them.

And I'm not so sure that Tate is actually much better than these two rookies. Crowell runs in a pretty special way. I don't part with that guy just yet.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Oct 1, 2014 4:19pm

Pretty good read until it gets to the Johnny Football vs Hoyer BS.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/11588966/browns-qbs-brian-hoyer-johnny-manziel-represent-old-vs-new-cleveland

Edit: I guess ESPN the mag is showing Cleveland some love with their next issue.

http://espn.go.com/espn/story/_/id/11588265/can-underdog-cleveland-fans-adapt-life-top

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/11588922/the-three-year-plan-lure-lebron-james-back-cleveland

iclfan2

Posts: 6,360

Oct 2, 2014 11:57am

Not much Browns talk this week. I can't listen to 92.3 atwork anymore so I don't pay as much attention, but excited for the game this Sunday.

DeyDurkie5

Posts: 11,324

Oct 2, 2014 12:14pm

I'm not. The browns will lose. Book it.

T

thavoice

Posts: 14,376

Oct 2, 2014 12:33pm

DeyDurkie5;1659679 wrote:I'm not. The browns will lose. Book it.

Nah. OIf a bye week..this is an easy win for the browns.

shook_17

Posts: 3,023

Oct 2, 2014 1:26pm

Shut the fuck up ^^^^ no such thing as an easy win. Ask the steelers about Tampa last week

DeyDurkie5

Posts: 11,324

Oct 2, 2014 2:08pm

thavoice;1659684 wrote:Nah. OIf a bye week..this is an easy win for the browns.

Just like Tampa at home?

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Oct 2, 2014 2:12pm

Pitt will beat the jags by 50+.

/obviousthavoicereversejinxderp

T

thavoice

Posts: 14,376

Oct 2, 2014 3:11pm

like_that;1659722 wrote:Pitt will beat the jags by 50+.

/obviousthavoicereversejinxderp

I will take that bet.......

Maybe not.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Oct 2, 2014 3:12pm

Rapistfucker doesn't get injured against the jags and sets career best records against them on way to beating jags by 50+