Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

Rose Bowl: #8 Ohio State vs. #7 Oregon - Ohio State wins 26-17

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Rose Bowl: #8 Ohio State vs. #7 Oregon - Ohio State wins 26-17
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 2, 2010 3:38 AM
The Oregon defensive game plan was ill-conceived. Make Pryor throw the ball. Not only ill-conceived but Tressel knew what it would be. Oregon made no adjustments. If they had moved a couple of players out of the box, the Ohio State power running game would have been unleashed.
Jan 1, 2010 10:38pm
jhay78's avatar

jhay78

Senior Member

1,917 posts
Jan 2, 2010 3:41 AM
Fabio wrote: So is Masoli still this godlike duel threat QB going 9/20 for 81 yds and 6 carries for 9 yards?
I remember Herbie naming him as an outsider Heisman candidate the last week of the regular season. Not a bad QB, but a tad overhyped.
Jan 1, 2010 10:41pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 2, 2010 3:51 AM
j_crazy wrote: great win for the bucks, but I'm certain that we won tonight and very few things looked like Tressel-ball. Which confirms my grumblings earlier this season that the playcalling was hampering the offense. The defense was impressive great win for Buckeye Nation. Excited for 2010, bring on them Canes.
Don't be silly!! Surely you aren't so doltish to suggest that early in the season Pryor was ready to do what he did today. HELL, he wasn't ready at mid-season, witnessed by the Purdue game. Early in the season he was still playing like a Freshman. Today he played like a Junior. A HUGE DIFFERENCE. Tressel did what was necessary after the Purdue game to win a Big Ten Title. Today Pryor was ready, so Tressel did what was required to win the Rose Bowl. Based on what he knew Oregon would do defensively.
Jan 1, 2010 10:51pm
osu45804's avatar

osu45804

Senior Member

6,188 posts
Jan 2, 2010 3:57 AM
What a game!!! Great way to end the season!!! Already can't wait for next season! Go Bucks!
Jan 1, 2010 10:57pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 2, 2010 3:58 AM
jhay78 wrote:
Fabio wrote: So is Masoli still this godlike duel threat QB going 9/20 for 81 yds and 6 carries for 9 yards?
I remember Herbie naming him as an outsider Heisman candidate the last week of the regular season. Not a bad QB, but a tad overhyped.
He's a "tad" to short. Who in the hell wants a 5-10 QB?? He's not a QB, he's a running back attempting to play QB. A 5-10 running back playing QB, is going to have problems against a very good defense. As was witnessed today. Gimmicks can only take you so far.
Jan 1, 2010 10:58pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:15 AM
mhs95_06 wrote: The big difference in the game was the luck of the fumble that rolled out of the end zone!
NOT "luck", think about it, who fumbled? The worst thing Oregon could have done was take Blount off suspension and let him play. One of those bad Karma things.
Jan 1, 2010 11:15pm
C

Citybuck

Senior Member

269 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:19 AM
Uh, what about the OSU offense rolling up a ton of yards and 9 more points than the Ducks....OSU and the Big Ten won face the facts dude !
Jan 1, 2010 11:19pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:20 AM
sportchampps wrote: I'm not saying he is gonna win it... just that with everyone we will most likly have back Pryor should be in the mix and next season we should be undefeated going into a title game
Ohio State has 16 starters back, Oregon has 18 back. Maybe Ohio State and Oregon will play each other again next year. In the BCS Title game.
Jan 1, 2010 11:20pm
Cat Food Flambe''s avatar

Cat Food Flambe'

Senior Member

1,230 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:22 AM
Masoli and the Ducks WERE able to move the ball - when they had it. If the time of possession had been equal, the outcome might have been different.

Unlike many games this season, Pryor and the OSU offense were able grind out minutes as well as points - it's the first time I've ever seen them really do a good job of running a possession-type offense in a long, long time. Pryor mentioned in the post-game that he felt that he had gained as much in post-season practice as had since coming to OSU - if he has learned to go through his reads and follow through, look out Big Ten.

Missing out on bowl games - and the extra practice time - two years running has to be ripping the life out of the Wolverweenies.
Jan 1, 2010 11:22pm
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:26 AM
I think we should try to schedule a home and home with Oregon after the Tennessee series that's scheduled for 2018/2019... that would be one hell of a thing to see. Oregon has to be the favorite in the Pac 10 next year. the Ducks moved the ball on short fields that we gave them with some really shitty kick coverage and when we didn't tackle by bouncing off of people. The zone read didn't burn us a whole hell of a lot, and except for the Jet Sweep(they could have run that every play and we woudln't have stopped it) and the screen when they got blockers out there I thought our defense played pretty disciplined football
Jan 1, 2010 11:26pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:27 AM
j_crazy wrote: anyone have a count on the times "6'6" 235#" has been said???

I'm thinking at least 25 at this point.
A FACT, that's what he weighed at the start of the season. He looks more like 245 now.

Such a childish little thing to get under one's skin.
Jan 1, 2010 11:27pm
newarkcatholicfan's avatar

newarkcatholicfan

Senior Member

3,199 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:28 AM
I would love to see the Bucks schedule
Boise State
Texas Tech
Jan 1, 2010 11:28pm
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:29 AM
I really don't wanna play Boise.

the last time we scheduled Texas Tech Kliff Kingsbury threw it like 63 times and they still lost by 20 pts
Jan 1, 2010 11:29pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:31 AM
j_crazy wrote: anyone have a count on the times "6'6" 235#" has been said???

I'm thinking at least 25 at this point.
A FACT, at least to start the season. He looks more like 245 now.

Such a childish little thing to get under ones skin.
Jan 1, 2010 11:31pm
D

DaBrowns41

Senior Member

1,304 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:33 AM
Cat Food Flambe' wrote: Masoli and the Ducks WERE able to move the ball - when they had it. If the time of possession had been equal, the outcome might have been different.

Unlike many games this season, Pryor and the OSU offense were able grind out minutes as well as points - it's the first time I've ever seen them really do a good job of running a possession-type offense in a long, long time. Pryor mentioned in the post-game that he felt that he had gained as much in post-season practice as had since coming to OSU - if he has learned to go through his reads and follow through, look out Big Ten.

Missing out on bowl games - and the extra practice time - two years running has to be ripping the life out of the Wolverweenies.
Oregon had 10 possessions and 7 of those 10 drives they had 5 plays and out.

I wouldn't exactly say that they were "moving the ball".

They only had 2 drives in which they moved the ball well, one was a 52 yard drive that ended in a field goal, and another was a 53 yard drive resulting in a TD. Their other TD came off of a 30 yard drive.
Jan 1, 2010 11:33pm
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:34 AM
Oregon didn't help themselves on 3rd down either... 2/10 I believe was the final numbers... we were like 9/18 or something I think to end it
Jan 1, 2010 11:34pm
C

Citybuck

Senior Member

269 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:39 AM
darbypitcher22 wrote: Oregon didn't help themselves on 3rd down either... 2/10 I believe was the final numbers... we were like 9/18 or something I think to end it
A lot of that had to do with the OSU denfense and the coaches game plan.....
Jan 1, 2010 11:39pm
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Jan 2, 2010 4:41 AM
^^^

this is true. We were able to get some pressure on third downs and we covered pretty well
Jan 1, 2010 11:41pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Jan 2, 2010 6:49 AM
According to Rock Knutne it was the "phantom" facemask call that lost Oregon this game. LOL

Buckeyes looked great. Pryor had some flashes of actual quarterbacking. He was making some zone reads in the second half. Could be his breakout game. Nice win Bucks, Top 3 team pres-season next year.
Jan 2, 2010 1:49am
Hesston's avatar

Hesston

Senior Member

516 posts
Jan 2, 2010 3:53 PM
Oregon's fumble in the end zone and Pryors 3rd down conversion to the tight end sealed the deal
Jan 2, 2010 10:53am