gut;1609285 wrote:While I don't think the full video was much better than the edited one...one of the things I did pick-up and understand was his point (poorly stated) about not being better off just a slave to a different master.

The word choices bothered me, but I thought worse was the way he was talking AT these different groups. And the gross oversimplification that ignore all the progress that has been made. Blacks may be disproportionately poor, but being a slave to uncle sugar is purely an ignorant/lazy thing.

He's really not saying anything different than most do about welfare and big gubmit, he's just a dumb hick that's really bad at communication who doesn't know how to sanitize his comments so as not to offend.

I don't think he's a racist or hates those groups he's just hopelessly ignorant. I tend to think of someone with biased or prejudice (both of which are pretty natural for everyone) as bigots (that portion stemming from basic ignorance), but people who act on that to cause harm are racists.

isadore;1609305 wrote:Oh God what an atrocity those teen agers committed. Some people just spend their lives looking for any example to support their prejudices.

like_that;1609315 wrote:Would you want your kids acting like that?

isadore;1609303 wrote:ripping off the government on a yearly basis for decades, why that is good old tea party tax dodging racist, cliven bundy

"When the grazing fee was first instituted on the forest reserves it was often referred to as a property tax. Permits quantified a certain number of AUMs, (animal-unit-months or the amount of feed required for one cow for one month,) as descriptive of a grazer's pre-existing rights of use. The grazing "tax" was based on the value of that level of use in AUMs as property. The term "tax" was used almost universally in newspaper reports in the west from 1905 for a decade or more. (The notion of grazing taxes is discussed at length in McCarthy Hour of Trial: The Conservation Conflict in Colorado and the West, 1891-1907 pp. 161-164.)

Gblock;1609476 wrote:Can't wait for the OC to start defending clippers owner Donald sterling today

Gblock;1609476 wrote:Can't wait for the OC to start defending clippers owner Donald sterling today

Gblock;1609538 wrote:Like that so u see logic in the op statements?

SportsAndLady;1609560 wrote:I live in Chicago and echo everything sleeper and like that have said.

It's fucking pathetic to watch people continue to make excuses instead of going out and getting a fucking job.

isadore;1609566 wrote:I appreciate your input Mr. Bundy. Of course Mr. like that has been shown to be dealing in stereotypes. Mr. Sleeper claimed black teen pregnancy rates were rising and their graduation rate was falling when the inverse was true. But of course you would "echo everything they say," because they support your prejudices.

Con_Alma;1609558 wrote:[video=youtube;vu_YKgGRFZ8][/video]

Loyal employee. Spouting the company line.

cruiser_96;1609567 wrote:You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you? Do you not realize that grad rates going up for African-Americans is IMPOSSIBLE!?!?!?!?! THEY WERE SLAVES during the early portions of our nation's history!!!!! Or did you not know that???

cruiser_96;1609580 wrote:So you did or didn't know blacks were slaves during the early portion of our nation's history??????

Gblock;1609583 wrote:If I base ur opinion on the black race from looking at inner city Chicago your views are really skewed... They don't speak for everyone

rmolin73;1609625 wrote:I find the comments about black people intriguing whenever someone white puts their foot in their mouth.

gut;1609627 wrote:Well, generally speaking, a black person can't put their foot in their mouth without gubmit help