jmog;1599914 wrote:100% of that post was your opinion with zero facts. Let's list BS's opinions:
1. He publishes garbage.
2. His published research is contravened by the entirety of scientific knowledge that has been compiled by 99% of other people with PhDs.
3. His ideas are terrible.
4. His ideas have been easily refuted.
5. He is a pseudo-scientist.
6. His ideas have been rejected his entire life.

jmog;1599915 wrote:BS did a 5 second google search, posted the first thing that came up and immediately he is an expert at how Dr. Gentry has been a kook his whole life and has always had his kook ideas immediately refuted by 99% of PhD scientists out there.

His logical failure jumps couldn't be funnier.

I do like your last statement however...Sleeper, BS, and Tom Baillieul are not peer reviewed, but this "kook" Gentry is...

BoatShoes;1599922 wrote:Umm...we have had these debates before dontcha know....

We get it....none of the thousands of peer reviewed articles in support of evolution with common descent or the big bang will persuade you...but one kook's ideas about Radiohalos was enough to get you to give up your sincere, deeply held belief in evolution that you had in college.

BoatShoes;1599919 wrote:There are articles that have bothered to refute his ideas in peer reviewed journals as well but you already knew that.

queencitybuckeye;1599918 wrote:In effect, that's what his peers say. In more detail they say it's junk science meant to "prove" a preconceived idea.

queencitybuckeye;1599918 wrote:Peer-reviewed != credible.

fish82;1599932 wrote:
Some do...some don't. Let's not act like that's the consensus opinion.

You should probably give the heads up to the worldwide scientific community about this...they seem to put a pretty large amount of stock in it. :huh:

queencitybuckeye;1599941 wrote:Consensus, no. Overwhelming majority opinion, yes.

queencitybuckeye;1599941 wrote:No need, they already know the difference. That something is peer-reviewed doesn't mean what you appear to believe it means. Something can be peer-reviewed and judged by those peers to be garbage. Which is basically the case here.

The biggest difference for the youth of today is access to information.

HitsRus;1600729 wrote:Most sadly, because of the internet, youth (or anybody for that matter) has the fastest access to some of the biggest bullshit, half truths and non truths in human history.

sleeper;1600810 wrote:No, they had that before the internet and that was called the bible and childhood indoctrination. Information is absolutely undermining the credibility of any institution that has to rely on fear and ignorance to ever register on the radar. Remember, there's nothing more bullshit than a group that derides science for not having all the answers but yet seems to have all the answers itself without proving even a drop of it.

jmog;1600823 wrote:Yup, the internet is REALLY undermining people's belief in creationism...

http://www.gallup.com/poll/155003/hold-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx

46% of American's believe that God created humans less than 10,000 years ago, and that number hasn't really changed (slightly higher) since 1982. If you were correct, then one would expect since the internet got "big" around 2000/2001 when over 50% of households started having the internet in there home, that this statistics would fall off the map. In fact, it has not.

I am sorry that facts don't support your opinion once again.

Where the completely cell to human without any supreme being's help numbers have gone up (10% to about 15%) they have just "taken" the numbers from those that already believed in evolution but believed God helped it along. They have NOT taken any believers from the "young earth" crowd...percentage wise.

Remember, there's nothing more bullshit than a group that derides science for not having all the answers but yet seems to have all the answers itself without proving even a drop of it.

sleeper;1600844 wrote:So what you're saying is 46% of Americans are either balls deep delusional or downright moronic. Nice!

sleeper;1600844 wrote:So what you're saying is 46% of Americans are either balls deep delusional or downright moronic. Nice!

jmog;1600885 wrote: just make stuff up as you go along.

dlazz;1600887 wrote:Like religion?

1. Christian Conservatives
Constantly under siege. You people don't know oppression until you're the member of the ruling majority and have permanent gerrymandered footholds in a majority of states. THE GAYS WON'T STOP PUSHING THEIR GAY AGENDA DOWN MY THROAT! They're opening my mouth and putting their gay penis in there and ejaculating hot talking points right down into my belly! The town hall won't put on a Nativity display because atheists are assholes! Hollywood is run by Jews! Radical Islamists are coming to bomb me ... sometime!
And of course the worst part is that, as a historically dominant segment of society, you're not allowed to complain. Talk about anti-Christian discrimination and you just get laughed at. But it's real! Why are you laughing? STOP LAUGHING. THIS IS IMPORTANT.

vs.


7. Dawkins-style hardcore atheists
Prove to me that God exists. Go on! Prove it! You can't. You're nothing more than a fucking lemming who bases his ethics on some old fairy tale. I laugh at your naiveté. You will die cold and alone and falling into an endless black void and I'll finally be proven right, which is the most important thing! I bet you think A-Rod is a choke artist, too.

HitsRus;1601126 wrote:...used to convey a message to primitive people, they win!...at least in their own minds.