sleeper;1585668 wrote:Stop calling sales "donations" and there you have it. Revenue minus expenses = profit. Tax the profit.

There isn't profit. Churches don't have shareholders that get residuals. Any excess revenue is kept as such, a rainy day fund.

Again, what are you taxing?

Devils Advocate;1585785 wrote:I guess you don't get it.

They are both wrong because of their base belief. here is the problem

2+2=4 ~ logic and provable

Westboro 2+2=4 Fagguts go to hell~ WRONG

Most Christians~ 2+2= the holy trinity and God sent his only son....blah blah blah~ Wrong

Both are wrong, you just don't like Westboro's answers.

Yeah....not your best work.

Manhattan Buckeye;1585790 wrote:There isn't profit. Churches don't have shareholders that get residuals. Any excess revenue is kept as such, a rainy day fund.

Again, what are you taxing?

I'm not sure why he can't wrap his mind around this fact.

Me thinks he's just being dumb on purpose to stir the pot a little.

I'd sure like to know how much that smiling dipshit Joel Oelstein with the mega Christian Houston church makes and all the other smiling hypocrites inside pay that fucker every year. But because its not a public Corp we'll never know what that money sucking machine pulls in every year.

Whatever the decision, I am 100% against the government adding any more taxes before we get this mess figured out first.

Just what we need, the government getting more money to spend wrong.

OSH;1585895 wrote:Whatever the decision, I am 100% against the government adding any more taxes before we get this mess figured out first.

Just what we need, the government getting more money to spend wrong.

That's the best point in this whole thread.

OSH;1585895 wrote:Whatever the decision, I am 100% against the government adding any more taxes before we get this mess figured out first.

Just what we need, the government getting more money to spend wrong.

Close it down folks.