Laley23;1572751 wrote: Nobody who is gay gives 2 fucks about what anyone does with their life. They dont give 2 fucks if you are straight and are content in your marriage to the opposite sex.

Laley23;1572751 wrote:Thats not the same at all.

Pushing gayness and is NOT pushing anti-straightness.

Nobody who is gay gives 2 fucks about what anyone does with their life. They dont give 2 fucks if you are straight and are content in your marriage to the opposite sex. All they care about is having the ability to do the same things, ie, marriage.

Now, on the flip side, people who are anti-gay clearly do care and literally spend countless hours of their lives trying to keep gay people unhappy. It makes no sense. If we didnt have anti-gay, we wouldnt have anything to push down our throats.

Laley23;1572751 wrote: Now, on the flip side, people who are anti-gay clearly do care and literally spend countless hours of their lives trying to keep gay people unhappy. It makes no sense. If we didnt have anti-gay, we wouldnt have anything to push down our throats.

WebFire;1572755 wrote:Interesting, because you could reverse the gays and straights in this quote and it describes me perfectly. But you are making it about the gays, and that's not what this is about. It's about a group taking advantage of a situation to push an agenda. I'd be pissed if it were a political group pushing some political agenda too. Not the right forum for it. And it was CLEARLY an agenda push.

WebFire;1572755 wrote:Interesting, because you could reverse the gays and straights in this quote and it describes me perfectly. But you are making it about the gays, and that's not what this is about. It's about a group taking advantage of a situation to push an agenda. I'd be pissed if it were a political group pushing some political agenda too. Not the right forum for it. And it was CLEARLY an agenda push.

Laley23;1572763 wrote:I was answering your anti-gay protest for next year question lol.

WebFire;1572758 wrote:Also, this describes perfectly how people think it is ok to have one view, but not the other. If it's ok to be for gay marriage, it's just as ok to be against it. But for some reason, if you take on one of the stances, you aren't allowed to be "right".

Laley23;1572769 wrote:Thats fine, they are allowed to be on whatever side they want.

My point is, why is there a side to begin with?

WebFire;1572758 wrote:Also, this describes perfectly how people think it is ok to have one view, but not the other. If it's ok to be for gay marriage, it's just as ok to be against it. But for some reason, if you take on one of the stances, you aren't allowed to be "right".

WebFire;1572758 wrote:Also, this describes perfectly how people think it is ok to have one view, but not the other. If it's ok to be for gay marriage, it's just as ok to be against it. But for some reason, if you take on one of the stances, you aren't allowed to be "right".

Automatik;1572766 wrote:Kacey Musgraves.

Would marry.

WebFire;1572770 wrote:Because the government won't stay out of marriage.

bases_loaded;1572771 wrote:I just googled it. 10.5 years..August 2003. That's how long it took to going from two chicks kissing on cable tv being outrageous to gays being married on basic cable. And in case you missed it, well put some bench warming gay in the first lady's box for the SOTU.We've come along way from a church at the center of every town to oppressing the people that go to that church, but damn is it escalated.

I Wear Pants;1572774 wrote:Why do you get to say "I don't like it, it shouldn't be on TV"? What makes your view the one that gets to decide what is and isn't right? And that's not blocking you from having your opinion. Including country music in a broadcast isn't a denial of other music genre's and including something gay in a broadcast isn't somehow anti-straight.

WebFire;1572768 wrote:Right, and you basically said they shouldn't.

I Wear Pants;1572777 wrote:Lol. Yeah, you're so oppressed.

I Wear Pants;1572774 wrote:Why do you get to say "I don't like it, it shouldn't be on TV"? What makes your view the one that gets to decide what is and isn't right? And that's not blocking you from having your opinion. Including country music in a broadcast isn't a denial of other music genre's and including something gay in a broadcast isn't somehow anti-straight.

I Wear Pants;1572777 wrote:Lol. Yeah, you're so oppressed.

WebFire;1572781 wrote:So you'd be ok with an anti-gay marriage group taking that opp to go on stage and preach it? I doubt that.

bases_loaded;1572784 wrote:Their opinions are the most oppressed in the country. Everyone has freedom of speech but only theirs comes with negative consequences and connotations.