vball10set;1554199 wrote:^^^ok, fair enough, and good post...bottom line, Tressel's a good guy who looks out for his players, but in the end it cost him his job. I still think his legacy at OSU is a good one, but there will always be detractors (right, Tearnan?)
I think his legacy is just as safe as Woody's was after being fired. Tressel got a standing O when he was honored during the 2002 comemorative ceremony.
lhslep134;1554400 wrote:He fell on the sword for the University, not necessarily the athletic department (think very hard about this distinction).
I know this because I had an intimate conversation with the lawyer who represented Tressel in front of the NCAA during the whole ordeal (he made the briefest of appearances in 'Youngstown Boys')
lhslep134;1554428 wrote:There's nothing confidential because it wasn't a legal proceeding and it should be in the transcript of the hearing. But like I said, it was passed over (I'm assuming inadvertently) by the NCAA investigators.
I'll ask you this question to help you get a better sense of what I'm talking about: if you were a professor at OSU, and a legal issue came up in regards to a student or something that happened in class, who would you tell?
I am pretty sure that a lawyer has to keep client confidentiality regardless of if it is in a legal proceeding. Also, if it was in some sort of NCAA transcript, I'd think that would leak to the press somehow and they'd run with a story that huge.