Toledo BG is pretty fierce.Mohican00;1543596 wrote:it has been replaced?
"the game" hasnt had any relevance since 2006. It hasnt decided anything since the 2006 game either. Most people dont watch it anymore unless they are a fan of the teams.Mohican00;1543596 wrote:it has been replaced?
See the Iron Bowl since inception.carmen;1543628 wrote:"the game" hasnt had any relevance since 2006. It hasnt decided anything since the 2006 game either. Most people dont watch it anymore unless they are a fan of the teams.
carmen;1543628 wrote:"the game" hasnt had any relevance since 2006. It hasnt decided anything since the 2006 game either. Most people dont watch it anymore unless they are a fan of the teams.
preciselyvball10set;1543640 wrote:Just because it's "not relevant" to the FBS landscape doesn't mean it's not relevant to football fans nationally...let's see what the ratings are after the game, deal?
The ratings will likely be in the top 5 for the season despite Michigan being terrible.vball10set;1543640 wrote:Just because it's "not relevant" to the FBS landscape doesn't mean it's not relevant to football fans nationally...let's see what the ratings are after the game, deal?
I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.vball10set;1543640 wrote:Just because it's "not relevant" to the FBS landscape doesn't mean it's not relevant to football fans nationally...let's see what the ratings are after the game, deal?
Perhaps, but the thread is about rivalries. None of those qualify.carmen;1543652 wrote:I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.
Yeah of all those games I only watched Stan/Ore. Bama Auburn will probably be #1 this year(for regular season), Ore/Stan will probably be #2 and OSU/Mich will be #3. Not bad for an irrelevant game lol.carmen;1543652 wrote:I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.
That is an interesting stat, I looked it up and it appears that OSU hasn't beaten tsun by more than 11 in AA since 1961 (OSU won 50-20)JU-ICE;1543003 wrote:An interesting tidbit about the -12 spread is that OSU has not beaten UM by more that 11 points at the Big House since 1969. I fully expect that streak to end this year.
2007 it had relevance. Had Michigan won, they'd have represented the Big Ten in the BCS and OSU wouldn't have gone to the BCS Champsionship game.carmen;1543628 wrote:"the game" hasnt had any relevance since 2006. It hasnt decided anything since the 2006 game either. Most people dont watch it anymore unless they are a fan of the teams.
I was answering what I quoted.queencitybuckeye;1543654 wrote:Perhaps, but the thread is about rivalries. None of those qualify.
carmen;1543652 wrote:I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.
As of right now, line has moved to -14.5osu45804;1542419 wrote:Spread is OSU -12
Mark May offers well-rounded and balanced college football analysis. : thumbup:Midstate01;1543755 wrote:Dlazz you gotta change that avi. Its like I automatically dismiss your posts because I see that stupid moron in your picture
You're forgetting OSU and UM have the two largest fanbases in college football. That helpscarmen;1543652 wrote:I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.
Reps!!Midstate01;1543755 wrote:Dlazz you gotta change that avi. Its like I automatically dismiss your posts because I see that stupid moron in your picture
And not mentioned for the Doak Walker Award!se-alum;1543778 wrote:Carlos Hyde is averaging 7.7 yards per carry. That's pretty crazy for someone averaging 18 carries a game.
se-alum;1543884 wrote:
Looks like plenty of people showed up.
Except the one you posted was Monday, and the one he's talking about was Tuesday.
SorryGoChiefs;1543913 wrote:Except the one you posted was Monday, and the one he's talking about was Tuesday.
Tiernan;1543921 wrote:Travesty of ESPN predjudice that Hyde isnt mentioned for the Walker Award. They will give it to Johnny Fuckup no matter what the actual voting numbers are.