SportsAndLady;1542536 wrote:So you're comparing incest to having an affair?
*sigh*
Let me try to explain myself clearly, so you understand, because obviously, that hasn't happened.
Am I comparing them in intensity of morality? No. You simply trumped up some unbased claim about me talking a lot about morality on here (which, to my knowledge, I don't really). I replied by pointing out that this isn't the only case in which I treat the situation as though it's none of my business.
As an aside, so long as they aren't having kids, who can you prove they're hurting? Why should I give so much of a shit about their lives that I feel the need to go out of my way to try to get them in legal trouble for doing something that, to my knowledge, isn't hurting anybody?
SportsAndLady;1542536 wrote:You're a POS if you know a guy is fucking, more than likely without a condom, their sister and don't tell, but you are not a POS if you know someone is cheating on their wife and don't tell.
And you're being illogically assumptive in saying they're most likely not using a condom. Do you know them better than I do, or something? Do you have a lot of experience in this area, such that you can speak with even the smallest amount of authority?
I certainly can't, which is why I don't make that assumption. Apparently, however, you can. Tell us where you acquired all this knowledge.
And I'd hardly say "keeping my nose out of other people's business" is me being a piece of shit. Apparently, by your standards, I need to make sure my friends aren't breaking the law, even if it isn't hurting me, if I think what they're doing is gross and immoral.
SportsAndLady;1542536 wrote:In 10 years when their 4-armed mentally retarded child dies, how good will you feel knowing you could have said something?
You and the assumptions today.
You assume they'd get pregnant (presumably because you have exclusive knowledge of their condom use).
You assume they'd keep the baby (You do know that abortion is legal, yes? If not, guess what? Abortion is legal. The more you know.).
You assume the child would have a disability (Despite the higher likelihood, genetically, it doesn't make it inevitable.).
You assume the child would die (Not all do.).
Tell me. What other blind assumptions would you like to make to paint them as more than just bumpkins with a bad case of Appalachia?
SportsAndLady;1542539 wrote:If my neighbor was fucking his sister, I wouldn't just let it happen lol
Well, then I guess your neighborhood can sleep more soundly knowing that SnL is on the job, protecting them from the evil incestuous siblings that will ruin their lives. Congratulations. Would you like a badge?
Or perhaps you'd rather stay out of people's shit if it has nothing to do with you ... that's my plan. Same way I treat abortion, gay marriage, my neighbors lighting up a blunt, and any other shit that doesn't concern me or immediately infringe on the rights of anyone else.
ernest_t_bass;1542550 wrote:Justin has asked his mods (per sleeper/isadore/wasadore/weeper/con_alma) to produce content in new threads. Since otrap is smart, I call this whole thing BS.
Actually, I've known about it since before he said that, but it was indeed my reason for bringing it up.
However, I can assure you that they're very much really involved.
Curly J;1542567 wrote:Scary that S&L is now the Moral/Legal Police of The OC.
Belly has a run for his money.