400 pound hs runningback

Home Archive Serious Business 400 pound hs runningback
said_aouita's avatar

said_aouita

Banned

8,532 posts
Nov 16, 2013 11:18 AM
Reminds me of Barry Sanders. Amazing cutting ability for a big guy.
Nov 16, 2013 11:18am
Classyposter58's avatar

Classyposter58

Senior Member

6,321 posts
Nov 16, 2013 11:42 AM
It's almost like the NFHS should make that illegal. In this 6th grade league I ref the ball carrier has to be under 150
Nov 16, 2013 11:42am
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Nov 16, 2013 12:18 PM
Classyposter58;1536679 wrote:It's almost like the NFHS should make that illegal. In this 6th grade league I ref the ball carrier has to be under 150
That is literally the dumbest fucking thing I have ever read.
Nov 16, 2013 12:18pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 16, 2013 12:20 PM
Classyposter58;1536679 wrote:It's almost like the NFHS should make that illegal. In this 6th grade league I ref the ball carrier has to be under 150
They should require them to wear skirts and makeup too
Nov 16, 2013 12:20pm
hasbeen's avatar

hasbeen

Excuse me, Flo?

6,504 posts
Nov 16, 2013 12:36 PM
Classyposter58;1536679 wrote:It's almost like the NFHS should make that illegal. In this 6th grade league I ref the ball carrier has to be under 150
yeah. let's pussify america even more
Nov 16, 2013 12:36pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Nov 16, 2013 1:53 PM
wildcats20;1536697 wrote:That is literally the dumbest fucking thing I have ever read.
The rule in my league, 5th-6th grade, was 115 I think. In 2000. Over 115 lbs you had to play on the line on offense and defense. Not a new trend. But yeah, stupid as all fuck.
Nov 16, 2013 1:53pm
Classyposter58's avatar

Classyposter58

Senior Member

6,321 posts
Nov 16, 2013 2:00 PM
wildcats20;1536697 wrote:That is literally the dumbest fucking thing I have ever read.
Ha it's not pussifying, but this is the equivalent of putting a really fat guy in a hockey net and letting nothing get through. That's not even football, it's like using the bowling ball power up in Backyard Football
Nov 16, 2013 2:00pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Nov 16, 2013 2:11 PM
It's not about "pussifying", it's an attempt to make them actually learn to play football rather than "who has the kid that hit his growth spurt earliest". Youth football is all about development which that rule helps.
Nov 16, 2013 2:11pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Nov 16, 2013 2:26 PM
Classyposter58;1536759 wrote:Ha it's not pussifying, but this is the equivalent of putting a really fat guy in a hockey net and letting nothing get through. That's not even football, it's like using the bowling ball power up in Backyard Football
If putting a really fat guy in the net to block the puck worked, then hockey teams in the NHL would be doing that. You literally post stupid shit with every post you make.
Nov 16, 2013 2:26pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Nov 16, 2013 2:40 PM
Geezus classlessposter, are you really that fucking dumb?
Nov 16, 2013 2:40pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Nov 16, 2013 2:43 PM
I Wear Pants;1536764 wrote:It's not about "pussifying", it's an attempt to make them actually learn to play football rather than "who has the kid that hit his growth spurt earliest". Youth football is all about development which that rule helps.
True, and it's a way to protect the young ones, since not all kids hit puberty or grow at the same rate. JH/HS football is another level, what classlessposter said is fucking stupid. It is completely fair what they do. Learn to hit the big guy low. You ever see a lineman pick up a fumble and try to run with it? He hits the ground very quickly.

Next thing we know classless poster is going to QQ because a basketball team has some kid who is 7'10.
Nov 16, 2013 2:43pm
said_aouita's avatar

said_aouita

Banned

8,532 posts
Nov 16, 2013 6:09 PM
ccrunner609;1536825 wrote:Why would the national federation of HS be making rules for 6th grade football?
Obama
Nov 16, 2013 6:09pm
pmoney25's avatar

pmoney25

Senior Member

1,787 posts
Nov 16, 2013 7:05 PM
My son played Mini Football (1st and 2nd grade).He was a 1st grader. They had a weight limit for ball carriers of 75 lbs. They would actually weigh some kids before games. Believe it or not there were some kids in 2nd grade who were tipping the scales around 120-125.
Nov 16, 2013 7:05pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Nov 16, 2013 9:05 PM
ccrunner609;1537059 wrote:there is absolutely no reason for a 1st grader to be playing football.
Two hour practices 3-4 times a week for 3rd-6th graders is too much around here, but those damn Super Dads who are 5'10 and started 1 year of varsity football on a 4-6 team are going to have an NFL player. A huge peeve of mine.
Nov 16, 2013 9:05pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Nov 16, 2013 9:27 PM
lol. I started playing football the summer going into second grade. Dont see the harm in it. I think we only had two or three practices a week, though.
Nov 16, 2013 9:27pm
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Nov 16, 2013 9:27 PM
ccrunner609;1537059 wrote:there is absolutely no reason for a 1st grader to be playing football.
Bullshit. My son loved flag football in the first grade.
Nov 16, 2013 9:27pm
pmoney25's avatar

pmoney25

Senior Member

1,787 posts
Nov 16, 2013 10:02 PM
ccrunner609;1537059 wrote:there is absolutely no reason for a 1st grader to be playing football.
Other than the fact he enjoyed and learned quite a bit and made some friends. He is about to start basketball in a couple weeks. He enjoys sports.

Not sure why it is a big deal.
Nov 16, 2013 10:02pm
pmoney25's avatar

pmoney25

Senior Member

1,787 posts
Nov 16, 2013 10:04 PM
Ironman92;1537067 wrote:Two hour practices 3-4 times a week for 3rd-6th graders is too much around here, but those damn Super Dads who are 5'10 and started 1 year of varsity football on a 4-6 team are going to have an NFL player. A huge peeve of mine.
Football is pretty big where we are and I haven't come across very many of these guys.
Nov 16, 2013 10:04pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Nov 16, 2013 10:21 PM
pmoney25;1537096 wrote:Football is pretty big where we are and I haven't come across very many of these guys.
Good...maybe it's a local thing. We are just loaded with these dumbass dads. And the guys they have coaching aren't too great either.

I just hate seeing kids pushed to be the phenom at age 6. I have witnessed so many with my daughter's age kids and now my son's.....plus I see it ridiculously in my profession.
Nov 16, 2013 10:21pm
hasbeen's avatar

hasbeen

Excuse me, Flo?

6,504 posts
Nov 16, 2013 11:12 PM
Classyposter58;1536759 wrote:Ha it's not pussifying, but this is the equivalent of putting a really fat guy in a hockey net and letting nothing get through. That's not even football, it's like using the bowling ball power up in Backyard Football
I Wear Pants;1536764 wrote:It's not about "pussifying", it's an attempt to make them actually learn to play football rather than "who has the kid that hit his growth spurt earliest". Youth football is all about development which that rule helps.
Making a size rule in High School would be pussifying.
Nov 16, 2013 11:12pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Nov 16, 2013 11:40 PM
ccrunner609;1537059 wrote:there is absolutely no reason for a 1st grader to be playing football.
If you threw "tackle" in there, I would actually agree with you.
Nov 16, 2013 11:40pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Nov 16, 2013 11:52 PM
Mulva;1537142 wrote:If you threw "tackle" in there, I would actually agree with you.

Agree. Flag is fine. But honestly tackle isn't necessary until 5th grade, IMO.

Also, we have the "Madded dads", as I like to call them, in my area.
Nov 16, 2013 11:52pm
sherm03's avatar

sherm03

I go balls deep.

7,349 posts
Nov 17, 2013 12:15 AM
I played tackle football the summer between kindergarten and 1st grade. I absolutely loved it. It's not like kids hit hard enough to get seriously hurt at that age. And if the kid wants to do it and isn't forced to by his parents, then who gives a fuck?

And I totally agree with the above. I think it's OK putting a weight limit on ball carriers in 5th and 6th grade. We had that. Our best player actually got challenged before a game when I was in 5th grade and he was 2lbs. over. He got the X on his helmet for the rest of the season. We still went 8-0...but it sucked for him. But to put a weight limit on the ball carrier in high school would be a complete ***** move.
Nov 17, 2013 12:15am
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Nov 17, 2013 1:01 AM
i fail to see the problem with playing youth tackle football if there is a weight limit for ball carriers.
Nov 17, 2013 1:01am