wildcats20;1531679 wrote:What's with a bunch of them Stanford players NOT having their names on the jersey?
Yes. But why no names?karen lotz;1531705 wrote:Are they all offensive linemen looking guys wearing numbers in the 90s? Shaw had been working on a formation with 9 offensive linemen. Probably has something to do with having eligible numbers in those heavy formations.
wildcats20;1531707 wrote:Yes. But why no names?
At this rate they won't be in the title game anyway.ptown_trojans_1;1531713 wrote:No way Oregon will win the title with a rush defense like this.
No way, that 1 loss kills them in the computers.ernest_t_bass;1531721 wrote:Stanford wins, they jump OSU.
I'm not so sure. Computers will deck them for having a loss on their schedule.ernest_t_bass;1531721 wrote:Stanford wins, they jump OSU.
They won't been playing for the title.ptown_trojans_1;1531713 wrote:No way Oregon will win the title with a rush defense like this.
Stanford lost to Utah, they aren't jumping OSU.ernest_t_bass;1531721 wrote:Stanford wins, they jump OSU.
lolernest_t_bass;1531721 wrote:Stanford wins, they jump OSU.
still think that goes to VTrobj55;1531737 wrote:Same Oregon different year, most over hyped team every year.
Vt gets more respect for being an awful team than anyone in the countryMohican00;1531740 wrote:still think that goes to VT
Oregon just recruits track stars all over the field to try and kill you with speed. It all falls apart when you face a fundamentally sound team (like Stanford).Midstate01;1531751 wrote: Oregon has the means to recruit well, I dont understand why they dont spend more time getting more physical on defense.
