#4 Ohio State 63, Penn State 14

College Sports 208 replies 6,409 views
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2013 7:19am
Penn State has the #26 passing O in the country, but only 11 passing TD. They are one of the worst rushing offenses OSU will have faced in the B1G this year (#79).

Average scoring defense.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 21, 2013 7:42am
OSU by 21, Hyde w/200+...GO BUCKS!!!
rrfan's avatar
rrfan
Posts: 1,922
Oct 21, 2013 8:06am
Buckeye Defense needs to shape up in the passing game. Hyde is the MVP of the team and I will take the Bucks by 2 scores.
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Oct 21, 2013 10:45am
I'd expect the same sort of game as against Iowa. Bucks have too much versatility and athleticism on offense for PSU to stop them, but the game is close most of the way (and ends at about a two-score margin), because they'll easily be able to get down the field in 5-10 yard chunks against OSU's AWESOME "lay three yards off all the receivers" style of pass coverage.

With the saving grace being that, from the stats LJ posted, PSU is great at dinking and dunking their way down the field, but not so great at finishing drives with 7 apparently.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2013 11:04am
Heretic;1521178 wrote:I'd expect the same sort of game as against Iowa. Bucks have too much versatility and athleticism on offense for PSU to stop them, but the game is close most of the way (and ends at about a two-score margin), because they'll easily be able to get down the field in 5-10 yard chunks against OSU's AWESOME "lay three yards off all the receivers" style of pass coverage.

With the saving grace being that, from the stats LJ posted, PSU is great at dinking and dunking their way down the field, but not so great at finishing drives with 7 apparently.
They are a bit more of a downfield team than a dink and dunk. Hackenberg has a big accurate arm. They attack the sidelines and the seams hard. A lot less slants, hitches and TE drags than what Iowa ran.

PSU scores 96% of the time they are in the redzone. 23 redzone attempts, 16 td and 6 fg.
M
MontyBrunswick
Oct 21, 2013 1:34pm
OSU is ripe for one of those offensive blowouts (like Nebraska last year).

OSU: 60+
PSU: 28
Rotinaj's avatar
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Oct 21, 2013 2:50pm
OSU wins 38-17.
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Oct 21, 2013 5:43pm
LJ;1521197 wrote:They are a bit more of a downfield team than a dink and dunk. Hackenberg has a big accurate arm. They attack the sidelines and the seams hard. A lot less slants, hitches and TE drags than what Iowa ran.

PSU scores 96% of the time they are in the redzone. 23 redzone attempts, 16 td and 6 fg.
I just think that if OSU plays the same sort of defense as they did against Iowa (laying off short routes, in particular), it'll be a lot easier for PSU to move the ball in small chunks. OSU has the athletes to make going deep risky, but if they're giving cushions, the inside stuff is open all day long unless there's legit pressure on the QB.

But that could be partly due to how I nearly screamed myself hoarse Saturday afternoon at how easily Iowa was getting those 5-10 yard completions and marching down the field -- to where I'm just totally pissed off and 100% sure that as long as any remotely competent team plays safe and smart, they could do the same with ease.
Mohican00's avatar
Mohican00
Posts: 3,394
Oct 21, 2013 8:23pm
dlazz;1521329 wrote:OSU: 60+

not gonna happen
ohiobucks1's avatar
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
Oct 21, 2013 10:48pm
OSU 49
PSU 30
se-alum's avatar
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Oct 21, 2013 11:22pm
Heretic;1521433 wrote:I just think that if OSU plays the same sort of defense as they did against Iowa (laying off short routes, in particular), it'll be a lot easier for PSU to move the ball in small chunks. OSU has the athletes to make going deep risky, but if they're giving cushions, the inside stuff is open all day long unless there's legit pressure on the QB.

But that could be partly due to how I nearly screamed myself hoarse Saturday afternoon at how easily Iowa was getting those 5-10 yard completions and marching down the field -- to where I'm just totally pissed off and 100% sure that as long as any remotely competent team plays safe and smart, they could do the same with ease.
The OSU defense is just too vanilla right now. They are too easy for even mediocre offenses to scheme against. Basically the formula right now is for OSU to score some kind of points on every possession, and for the defense to get 2 or 3 stops a game.
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
Oct 22, 2013 4:52am
se-alum;1521645 wrote:Basically the formula right now is for OSU to score some kind of points on every possession, and for the defense to get 2 or 3 stops a game.
Correct. In that game plan Hackenberg & Co. will put some points up too.

Ohio State 35
Penn State 24
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2013 7:25am
Heretic;1521433 wrote:I just think that if OSU plays the same sort of defense as they did against Iowa (laying off short routes, in particular), it'll be a lot easier for PSU to move the ball in small chunks. OSU has the athletes to make going deep risky, but if they're giving cushions, the inside stuff is open all day long unless there's legit pressure on the QB.

But that could be partly due to how I nearly screamed myself hoarse Saturday afternoon at how easily Iowa was getting those 5-10 yard completions and marching down the field -- to where I'm just totally pissed off and 100% sure that as long as any remotely competent team plays safe and smart, they could do the same with ease.
Their plan wasn't to lay off the short routes. The LB were supposed to be covering the flat and were getting sucked into play action. They were chasing the play into the flat every time. Shazier, Grant and Perry were all awful in coverage. Spence dropping into coverage was actually in his zone, but he just isn't a pass defender.

The linebackers should not have had a problem with those TE. I would hope that they bring more pressure this week as just with any true freshman, Hackenberg is really bad under pressure. While not the best athlete, Hackenberg can throw strikes while on the move, kind of a Big Ben style. OSU needs to collapse the pocket around him and not let him extend the play.
M
MontyBrunswick
Oct 22, 2013 8:12am
Mohican00;1521513 wrote:not gonna happen
IT WILL BECAUSE I SAY IT WILL
vdubb96's avatar
vdubb96
Posts: 2,210
Oct 22, 2013 11:58am
dlazz;1521698 wrote:IT WILL BECAUSE I SAY IT WILL
Then it surely won't
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Oct 22, 2013 12:11pm
Just scored free tickets to the game. WOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 22, 2013 1:11pm
Nice!
M
MontyBrunswick
Oct 22, 2013 2:00pm
Automatik;1521853 wrote:Just scored free tickets to the game. WOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
You taking me?
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Oct 23, 2013 9:40am
Sorry friend, I was a late addition due to a cancellation.


Gonna be a chilly eh? Low 40s for kickoff.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 23, 2013 2:33pm
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 23, 2013 2:36pm
vball10set;1522580 wrote:
There have been official dept commercials on the radio saying its a "pink out"
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Oct 23, 2013 2:38pm
Yeah, I heard about the "pink out"

I won't be participating. It's fucking stupid.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 23, 2013 2:39pm
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 23, 2013 2:40pm
LJ;1522581 wrote:There have been official dept commercials on the radio saying its a "pink out"


Kyle Rowland@KyleRowland
Ohio State spokesman confirms coaches will wear white polos with pink OSU logos this Saturday.

Andrew Holleran@andrewjholleran
Ohio State "should" be wearing its alternate rivalry uniform Saturday, a source tells me. Pink gloves, socks will be worn by players.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 23, 2013 2:40pm
Automatik;1522583 wrote:Yeah, I heard about the "pink out"

I won't be participating. It's fucking stupid.
At least it goes to the Spielman fund and not Komen