
That is all

Count me in as someone who doesn't think an ass like that is attractive.WebFire;1520534 wrote:Looks like a nice body ruined by a big ass.
3rdFly4Fun;1520536 wrote:Count me in as someone who doesn't think an ass like that is attractive.
mcburg93;1520668 wrote:Would do some bad things to that big ass.
I don't get it, either. Big ass =/= nice assFly4Fun;1520536 wrote:Count me in as someone who doesn't think an ass like that is attractive.
WebFire;1520534 wrote:Looks like a nice body ruined by a big ass.
Fly4Fun;1520536 wrote:Count me in as someone who doesn't think an ass like that is attractive.
said_aouita;1520543 wrote:3rd
gut;1520687 wrote:I don't get it, either. Big ass =/= nice ass
agreed. Ass is just way too big.WebFire;1520534 wrote:Looks like a nice body ruined by a big ass.
She's already 33, just had a baby, and is looking pretty damn good, IMO.believer;1520515 wrote:^^^
Nice ass now but I guarantee you that when she hits her mid-30's she'll weigh 160 pounds and that ass will be hanging close to her knees.
How do you know this...is she someone we should recognize?Fab4Runner;1521194 wrote:She's already 33, just had a baby, and is looking pretty damn good, IMO.
Also, 160 lbs doesn't automatically mean someone is fat.
You're right a chick that is 6'3"+ at 160 would be a hottie. Chicks at 5'5" / 160 are packin it on.Fab4Runner;1521194 wrote: Also, 160 lbs doesn't automatically mean someone is fat.
Kim Kardashian.vball10set;1521196 wrote:How do you know this...is she someone we should recognize?
Damn, I didn't recognize her...thanks.Fab4Runner;1521200 wrote:Kim Kardashian.
And it makes her even less attractive.vball10set;1521203 wrote:Damn, I didn't recognize her...thanks.
Yeah..I thought she was attractive with a big ass before she changed her hair........now she just has a big assWebFire;1521209 wrote:And it makes her even less attractive.
