ohiobucks1;1473345 wrote:Jesus this keeps getting crazier and crazier. The lawyers at my firm think it's ridiculous that it was even tried and 13 out of 13 said all predicted he would be not guilty... Pretty good for litigators lol
C'mon, it was obvious to anyone with half a brain that Zimmerman's best lawyer may have been the DA as far as establishing reasonable doubt. Yeah, in that scenario this had no business going to trial. But we had indications of that since police wouldn't arrest, and the local DA wouldn't charge him...
The case was purely politically motivated. That said, I'm not sure the national attention it got was such a bad thing. It should force reasonable people to think carefully about their actions, finding themselves in the situation of either Zimmerman or TM.
I would also normally tend to side with going to trial in this scenario. While I trust the judgement of the law on whether they can get a conviction (or whether he may not be guilty), I think it is perhaps appropriate to go to trial when you use lethal force in self-defense BUT your ill-advised choices put you in that situation.
I also think Martin's family should go after Zimmerman in civil court so he will have to testify and we can finally get his side of the story under cross-examination. Based on comments from a few of the jurors, it's unlikely to win a civil judgement against Zimmerman. But if I'm family I simply want to see him on the stand.