
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
May 8, 2013 4:03pm
Oh, look who shows up.like_that;1440402 wrote:I would probably say the same thing if I had nothing.
Nah, really though, I dont care. COA is basically arguing with himself.

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 8, 2013 4:11pm
That's why you called me a dumbercrat right? Yeah clearly don't care. :rolleyes:Pick6;1440405 wrote:Oh, look who shows up.
Nah, really though, I dont care. COA is basically arguing with himself.
I'd be butthurt if I just pwnsterized like that too. Keep trying babyface.

sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 8, 2013 4:48pm
:thumbup:Pick6;1440398 wrote:tl; dr. Nobody care. Nobody asked.

Pick6
Posts: 14,946
May 8, 2013 4:51pm
Not butthurt at all. Its obvious you are the one thats butthurt, writing a couple hundred word responses when nobody even gives a shit. Wish I had that time, but hey, Im not a fat ass who spends all day being a dick head on a forum because I have nothing better to do with my life.Commander of Awesome;1440409 wrote:That's why you called me a dumbercrat right? Yeah clearly don't care. :rolleyes:
I'd be butthurt if I just pwnsterized like that too. Keep trying babyface.

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 8, 2013 4:57pm
Keep QQing bc you got pwned for running your mouth about shit you knew nothing about. It's hilarious.Pick6;1440432 wrote:Not butthurt at all. Its obvious you are the one thats butthurt, writing a couple hundred word responses when nobody even gives a shit. Wish I had that time, but hey, Im not a fat ass who spends all day being a dick head on a forum because I have nothing better to do with my life.
Oh, but I'm sorry. Forgot you don't care :rolleyes:

Pick6
Posts: 14,946
May 8, 2013 7:03pm
I didnt get "pwned" on anything. But if "pwning" on the internet gets your dick hard at night, think whatever you'd like, "big guy".Commander of Awesome;1440436 wrote:Keep QQing bc you got pwned for running your mouth about shit you knew nothing about. It's hilarious.
Oh, but I'm sorry. Forgot you don't care :rolleyes:

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 8, 2013 7:37pm
You're still talking about this? LOL, yeah dont care at all. We get it little guy.Pick6;1440481 wrote:I didnt get "pwned" on anything. But if "pwning" on the internet gets your dick hard at night, think whatever you'd like, "big guy".
I don't care at all, yet I'm going to foolishly agrue about something I know nothing about including citing garbage papers by other idiots. Then when the facts get thrown in my face and am humiliated looking like an asshat with my foot in my mouth I'll say I don't care. Bc clearly I dont! /pickfaillogic
:rolleyes:
S
Sonofanump
May 8, 2013 9:17pm
I had a turkey burger on whole wheat bun tonight.

O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
May 8, 2013 9:40pm
Most dietary changes that seem to have realistic levels of success all seem to have one thing in common: a lowering of carbohydrate intake. Inasmuch as the paleo diet does this, it may indeed be successful, but the initial article makes a good point that the foundation of it assumes that our ancestors essentially had a completely developed dietary system in place, given their surroundings.
If that could be substantiated, even then, there wouldn't necessarily be anything proven about its health benefits being based on that fact, but since that fact cannot be substantiated, it's moot.
It should be worth noting that it isn't inherently a worthless diet. Its quality simply isn't substantiated beyond any skepticism.
If that could be substantiated, even then, there wouldn't necessarily be anything proven about its health benefits being based on that fact, but since that fact cannot be substantiated, it's moot.
It should be worth noting that it isn't inherently a worthless diet. Its quality simply isn't substantiated beyond any skepticism.

sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 8, 2013 11:14pm
:thumbdown:O-Trap;1440581 wrote:Most dietary changes that seem to have realistic levels of success all seem to have one thing in common: a lowering of carbohydrate intake. Inasmuch as the paleo diet does this, it may indeed be successful, but the initial article makes a good point that the foundation of it assumes that our ancestors essentially had a completely developed dietary system in place, given their surroundings.
If that could be substantiated, even then, there wouldn't necessarily be anything proven about its health benefits being based on that fact, but since that fact cannot be substantiated, it's moot.
It should be worth noting that it isn't inherently a worthless diet. Its quality simply isn't substantiated beyond any skepticism.

O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
May 8, 2013 11:18pm
So sorry to disappoint, but there are substantiated facts that do corroborate that at least two elements of the paleo diet are healthy. The fact that it is "paleo" is not proven to be one of them, but lower carbohydrate intake and emphasis on non-processed foods both are. Those aren't exclusive to paleo, though.sleeper;1440635 wrote::thumbdown:

sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 8, 2013 11:30pm
:thumbup:O-Trap;1440637 wrote:So sorry to disappoint, but there are substantiated facts that do corroborate that at least two elements of the paleo diet are healthy. The fact that it is "paleo" is not proven to be one of them, but lower carbohydrate intake and emphasis on non-processed foods both are. Those aren't exclusive to paleo, though.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
May 9, 2013 6:57am
The diet itself isn't terrible. The premise behind it, whether real or marketing, is a little bit silly. Write a few lines on the reasoning behind the diet, then substitute the words "medical treatment" for "diet". You'll look like a wackadoodle.