FatHobbit;1431929 wrote:I think he is just being technical. Although I'm not sure I like them expanding the definition of WMD's.

GoChiefs;1431933 wrote:Technically, that is not all a WMD can be labeled as.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2332a

(2) the term “weapon of mass destruction” means—
(A) any destructive device as defined in section 921 of this title;

Go to section 921.....
(4) The term “destructive device” means—
(A) any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas—
(i) bomb,
(ii) grenade,
(iii) rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces,
(iv) missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce,
(v) mine, or
(vi) device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses;

FatHobbit;1431929 wrote:I think he is just being technical. Although I'm not sure I like them expanding the definition of WMD's.

ptown_trojans_1;1431930 wrote:Correct, legally and traditionally, a WMD is a chemical, bio, or nuclear weapon.
Let's just call the bombing what it was, a bomb. It wasn't a WMD in the classic sense, it was a bomb.

The dude should be locked up and then sent to death, and he will, but I'm not a fan of expanding the usage of WMD.
That language should be reversed for the worst of the worst weapons. Sorry for my narrow application of the word.

WebFire;1431941 wrote:Can't say I disagree. WMD isn't a term you just throw around because you are pissed and emotional about what happened. Like ptown said, do you do this when someone uses a pipe bomb? There has to be a line somewhere.

GoChiefs;1431444 wrote:White House says he will not be charged as an enemy combatant.

Charged with conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction.

wildcats20;1432157 wrote:Boston Globe just tweeted that Dzokhar has admitted that he and his brother detonated the bombs and killed the police officer.

Pick6;1432012 wrote:Props to reddit for owning up
http://rt.com/usa/tripathi-last-boston-reddit-275/

WebFire;1432161 wrote:Can't wait to hear what his aunt has to say.

vball10set;1432163 wrote:Did they really have a choice?

vball10set;1432163 wrote:Did they really have a choice?

Crimson streak;1432211 wrote:http://imgur.com/a/Nx8EU

Don't know if posted but still makes you think wtf lol

gut;1432214 wrote:Of course, he very conveniently ignores the most significant fact - multiple civilian witnesses saw these guys throwing bombs at police, and they admitted to being the Boston bombers. But never let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory.

Maybe Alex Jones will jump on the movie while Michael Moore is trying to figure out how he can link Bush and the Neocons.

Crimson streak;1432211 wrote:http://imgur.com/a/Nx8EU

Don't know if posted but still makes you think wtf lol

WebFire;1432231 wrote:The only one that makes you pause is the post with the prediction.

WebFire;1431941 wrote:Can't say I disagree. WMD isn't a term you just throw around because you are pissed and emotional about what happened. Like ptown said, do you do this when someone uses a pipe bomb? There has to be a line somewhere.

Mulva;1432308 wrote:Did they ever release who the naked guy supposedly was?

reclegend22;1432317 wrote:Interesting twist to the story that I must have missed..

gut;1432240 wrote:A lucky guess? I thought they would be identified within 48 hours. It took one more day. If they had gone into hiding, good luck guessing when they'd be found. If not, your choices of predicting a "raid" were probably Thurs, Fri and possibly Sat. The rest was sufficiently vague to go back ex-post and match "evidence" with "predictions".

WebFire;1432231 wrote:Most of that **** is downright stupid. The only one that makes you pause is the post with the prediction.

reclegend22;1432412 wrote:Why are the other two men in backpacks standing in the area of attack, one of which appears to have a backpack that looks very similar to one of the bags that is believed to have housed explosives, not cause for a pause? I don't subscribe to conspiracies for the most part, but the photographs of those men -- as long as they are of valid origin and not doctored in anyway -- certainly make it look as if perhaps they had at least some form of involvement. Then again, I do not remember why those two men were cleared as suspects, so perhaps I missed something.

There is no way the Tsarneav's acted alone. Either they had help here in the States, or the older brother was trained abroad and came back to plant those ideas into his younger brother's head. They had too many weapons, knew too much about bomb making and it just doesn't make sense.