O-Trap;1396831 wrote:This topic, honestly, should have been more broad. After all, skin tone and sex are not the only two reasons that a lesser employee might be chosen.
Attractiveness is certainly used in certain occupations.
Weight can be.
Literal vision (as opposed to proverbial vision).
Personality compatibility.
All these can be, and are, used in the hiring process, even though they don't inherently establish a candidate as a better employee.
If all things equal between a white prospective employee and a black prospective employee except for personality compatibility, would it not be considered racist for me to choose the one closer to my personality?
Gblock;1397169 wrote: We couldn't vote for a very long time, remember?
I know you didn't write this, but the younger generation need to realize there has never been a time in there life where they, as a black person, were not allowed to vote.
Gblock;1397171 wrote:also half of this country went to war because they didnt want blacks to have equal rights, half of this country if put to a vote would probably go back to jim crow. It wasnt like people wanted to give blacks equal rights. they had to march, fight, get beat, lynched and locked up for many years. it wasnt just handed to them
Half of this country would vote back Jim Crow? GTFOOHWTS.
More than half voted a black man as President. While there are some white people who'd vote for Jim Crow, I bet that percentage is probably equal to the percent of black people who'd prefer to kill at white people.
ernest_t_bass;1397172 wrote:You'd rather be homeless than my slave?
Me? Yes. You can't make a general inference about my preferences. I prefer to be independent and homeless rather than a slave with a roof over my head.