rrfan;1535457 wrote:series you are right you don't have to support something to discuss it. However, it is very interesting how the only time you say anything is to bash a coach or be negative about the season...
In your mind, not agreeing with you and a few others is, "bashing" a coach and being negative!
Saying that what he did do didn't work is, "bashing" a coach and being negative!
Saying that what he didn't do might have worked is, "bashing" a coach and being negative!
Stating the obvious truth that you see but don't want to hear or admit to is, "bashing" a coach and being negative!
rrfan;1535457 wrote:...But you know what...I did not see that happening before the season so it was a nice surprise. This years team did not lose to one team that you sit back and say we "should have beaten".
Yes you did...that is why so many of you predicted a possible 4-0 start, because you knew those first four teams were not that good and if Davault could avoid the passing game tendencies, especially against Triway, the chances of victory were that much more likely. There I go being negative and "bashing" again.
Regarding not losing to a team you should have beaten...it was stated early and repeatedly that Madison and Wooster were teams in the OCC that Orrville "should have beaten".
Is it negative to say that many of you didn't know what you were talking about? LOL!!!