T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Jan 10, 2013 10:51am
Jimmy Boy is finding out just being a big-shot billionaire doesn't cut alot of cheese getting some schlump to take over coaching the most inept franchise in the league. Allow me to recap for you...
Kelly...uh definitely a No
Marrone...got a better offer so its a No
Trestman...how do you say No in Canadian?
Wizenhut...After touring this excuse of a city I've gotta say No
Chudzinski...Leave sunny Carolina for that armpit of America? No Way!
Zimmer...Nobody has ever heard of me outside of the Cincy 275 outerbelt so I might consider this dog of a job.
Kelly...uh definitely a No
Marrone...got a better offer so its a No
Trestman...how do you say No in Canadian?
Wizenhut...After touring this excuse of a city I've gotta say No
Chudzinski...Leave sunny Carolina for that armpit of America? No Way!
Zimmer...Nobody has ever heard of me outside of the Cincy 275 outerbelt so I might consider this dog of a job.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 10, 2013 11:24am
And they thought things would be different. But I'm just a troll.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Jan 10, 2013 11:31am
Yeah I saw that Webbie where you lit up COA and the rest of the Browns Mafia. But you gotta rememner you were using a thing called "logic" which is unheard of in the blighted area known as NE Ohio.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jan 10, 2013 11:36am
Tiernan's panties in a bunch I see.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jan 10, 2013 11:39am
Explains why the Eagles & Bears are interviewing a shit ton of candidates too, dumbfuck. :rolleyes:
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Jan 10, 2013 11:43am
Eagles & Bears? You're not exactly helping your argument there Sparky.BR1986FB;1362812 wrote:Explains why the Eagles & Bears are interviewing a shit ton of candidates too, dumbfuck. :rolleyes:
and JFTR COA...Tiernan's panties are smooth as a baby's ass...its the Browns Org who is starting to look like complete hyenas.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jan 10, 2013 11:44am
WebFire;1362775 wrote:And they thought things would be different. But I'm just a troll.
The browns didnt interview that many people the last two hires. Not surprised you don't know that tho.
Nice fail.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 10, 2013 11:45am
wait, Tiernan admitted to wearing panties?
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Jan 10, 2013 11:52am
leopard thongs everyday dickless...and quit stalking me, you're embarrassing yourself if that is even possible anymore.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 10, 2013 12:02pm
This mean nothing. I asked if Browns fans really thought ownership change would really make a difference for the Browns. They all seemed to think so. Yet they can't even hire a decent coach.like_that;1362827 wrote:The browns didnt interview that many people the last two hires. Not surprised you don't know that tho.
Nice fail.
Number of interviews between owners is totally irrelevant to the conversation.
And now I am trolling since it's in the basement.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jan 10, 2013 12:12pm
Well, with the firing of Mularkey today, 25% of the NFL was/is looking for a new head coach (two have been filled), so the fact that Cleveland is one of six teams still interviewing, no big deal. Besides, I think their next head coach can't be interviewed right now because he's coaching on a playoff team.Tiernan;1362822 wrote:Eagles & Bears? You're not exactly helping your argument there Sparky.
And why in the Hell WOULDN'T you want to do your due diligence and interview as MANY candidates as possible? It's like a free 3-7 hour consulting gig. You pick the candidate's brain for ideas, get a feel for thoughts (league-wide) on your current roster, etc.
You're making a MUCH bigger deal out of it than you really have to with your weaker than Capone-like effort.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jan 10, 2013 12:16pm
Exactly. I'd much rather see these guys interview 10-15 guys than pull the Rander Lerner "oh...Eric Mangini just became available? I think I just pissed down my leg. Where's my phone? He's HIRED!" or the Mike Holmgren "Got the Rooney Rule candidate out of the way, now I'll hire Fritz's nephew" type of kneejerk shit.like_that;1362827 wrote:The browns didnt interview that many people the last two hires. Not surprised you don't know that tho.
Nice fail.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jan 10, 2013 12:22pm
BINGO. RAC wasn't hired until mid Feb.BR1986FB;1362883 wrote:Well, with the firing of Mularkey today, 25% of the NFL was/is looking for a new head coach (two have been filled), so the fact that Cleveland is one of six teams still interviewing, no big deal. Besides, I think their next head coach can't be interviewed right now because he's coaching on a playoff team.
And why in the Hell WOULDN'T you want to do your due diligence and interview as MANY candidates as possible? It's like a free 3-7 hour consulting gig. You pick the candidate's brain for ideas, get a feel for thoughts (league-wide) on your current roster, etc.
You're making a MUCH bigger deal out of it than you really have to with your weaker than Capone-like effort.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jan 10, 2013 12:24pm
Apparently this is all going over your head. You said nothing has changed. Well the old way for the Browns last ownership was to hire a guy immediately... This time around the Browns are interviewing numerous candidates to get the right choice. They haven't lost out on anyone. They didn't want Kelly after his interview. If they lost out on Kelly, he would have been coaching for another NFL team, not back at Oregon. And once again, as this went over your head the last time, the Browns have no had much change in ownership in their history. You are trying too hard.WebFire;1362863 wrote:This mean nothing. I asked if Browns fans really thought ownership change would really make a difference for the Browns. They all seemed to think so. Yet they can't even hire a decent coach.
Number of interviews between owners is totally irrelevant to the conversation.
And now I am trolling since it's in the basement.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Jan 10, 2013 12:35pm
You all are some rationalizing mofos aint ya?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jan 10, 2013 12:38pm
Who is your team anyway?Tiernan;1362907 wrote:You all are some rationalizing mofos aint ya?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jan 10, 2013 12:40pm
Don't need to "rationalize" it. If someone like Kelly, Cowher, Gruden, Saban, etc said "no" to Cleveland and then "yes" to another team there might be something to your "nobody wants to coach here" theory.Tiernan;1362907 wrote:You all are some rationalizing mofos aint ya?
Truth be told, Cleveland is a cherry job for any one of these coaches. Young, up & coming roster (Steelers & Ravens going to decline/OLD, too bad, so sad) along with $48.9 million in cap space ($35.5 million HAS to be used this year) and an owner who cares & is hungry. Not a bad place to be.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jan 10, 2013 12:41pm
Pretty sure he's a fan of the sister pumpin', floss with a ropin', banjo playin' on the stoop of the doublewide, Yinzer fan.like_that;1362910 wrote:Who is your team anyway?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jan 10, 2013 12:43pm
Would rep if I could. Well read again.BR1986FB;1362916 wrote:Pretty sure he's a fan of the sister pumpin', floss with a ropin', banjo playin' on the stoop of the doublewide, Yinzer fan.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Jan 10, 2013 12:54pm
BR1986FB;1362915 wrote:Don't need to "rationalize" it. If someone like Kelly, Cowher, Gruden, Saban, etc said "no" to Cleveland and then "yes" to another team there might be something to your "nobody wants to coach here" theory.
Truth be told, Cleveland is a cherry job for any one of these coaches. Young, up & coming roster (Steelers & Ravens going to decline/OLD, too bad, so sad) along with $48.9 million in cap space ($35.5 million HAS to be used this year) and an owner who cares & is hungry. Not a bad place to be.
Add in an extremely passionate fan base. If you win in Cleveland you are a god there
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Jan 10, 2013 12:59pm
I'm a huge Denver England Frisco Bay fan.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 10, 2013 1:55pm
Yeah ok.like_that;1362898 wrote:Apparently this is all going over your head. You said nothing has changed. Well the old way for the Browns last ownership was to hire a guy immediately... This time around the Browns are interviewing numerous candidates to get the right choice. They haven't lost out on anyone. They didn't want Kelly after his interview. If they lost out on Kelly, he would have been coaching for another NFL team, not back at Oregon. And once again, as this went over your head the last time, the Browns have no had much change in ownership in their history. You are trying too hard.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Jan 10, 2013 3:34pm
Jimmy Boy is giving Wizenhunt another chance to say "No" according to ESPN @ 3:30pm. Not sure how this fits into JB's claims that he would be hiring "a name" coach...
but I gotta give the little shit credit he keeps plugging away and asking girls to the dance, even if it has to be the fat ugly ones nobody else asked.
but I gotta give the little shit credit he keeps plugging away and asking girls to the dance, even if it has to be the fat ugly ones nobody else asked.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Jan 10, 2013 3:35pm
If you win in Cleveland you are a socerer...Crimson streak;1362934 wrote: If you win in Cleveland you are a god there
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jan 10, 2013 3:37pm
lolTiernan;1363111 wrote:If you win in Cleveland you are a socerer...
fyi, your sig is butchered.