Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Jan 20, 2013 2:31pm
Yeah I think the playoffs may very well be a pipe dream but who knows, that game was painfulEnd of Line;1370194 wrote:Great watching hockey all night. The fans showed up big time as well.
Pens PK looked good, Sutter was great. Detroit is just flat out bad. Holtby won't be the same without Dale Hunter's system. St. Louis is the best team in the west. Columbus playing as they did in 00-01, as a team and grinding you down. The Wild are going to be very, very good. Jagr and Selanne looked great for being 40+. Canucks played terrible.
End of Line
Posts: 6,867
Jan 20, 2013 4:04pm
No defense, and Kronwall is not a #1 more like a #3 or #4 defenseman.Classyposter58;1370371 wrote:Yeah I think the playoffs may very well be a pipe dream but who knows, that game was painful
sportsfan24
Posts: 181
Jan 20, 2013 10:14pm
Penguins beat the Rangers 6-3.
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Jan 20, 2013 11:44pm
Yeah, the Red Wings have the proper prospects and cap space to make some big moves however as they should. They just need to gel a little more first as well, I cannot write them off completely yet. They do need to become a much more physical team however, St Louis flat out bullied themEnd of Line;1370444 wrote:No defense, and Kronwall is not a #1 more like a #3 or #4 defenseman.
End of Line
Posts: 6,867
Jan 21, 2013 4:23pm
Holland really doesn't like grinders on his team, never really has. He needs to add toughness to the lineup, other than Tootoo.Classyposter58;1370813 wrote:Yeah, the Red Wings have the proper prospects and cap space to make some big moves however as they should. They just need to gel a little more first as well, I cannot write them off completely yet. They do need to become a much more physical team however, St Louis flat out bullied them
End of Line
Posts: 6,867
Jan 21, 2013 4:27pm
[h=1]NHL TV ratings 2013: NBC scores best hockey ratings since 2002, local numbers huge[/h]
NBC drew a massive (for hockey) 2.0 overnight rating for regional coverage of the Penguins and Flyers as well as the Kings and Blackhawks, which included the Kings' banner-raising ceremony. This was the best overnight rating for a regular season NHL telecast (not counting the Winter Classic) since Jan. 12, 2002. That day, ABC was airing regional coverage, led by Rangers-Flyers, which was Eric Lindros' return game to Philadelphia. That gives you an idea of how long it's been since we've seen NHL ratings this high.As is often the case, the local markets won the day for the network and the league. Pittsburgh drew a bonkers-for-the-regular season 19.4 rating. That's an indoor record for an NHL game on NBC in the market. The same was true for Philadelphia (7.8) and Chicago (6.6). Los Angeles, which hosted it's banner-raising, drew a 1.5 in the market. That was the best in L.A. since 2007. While that might not seem too high, remember that not only is Los Angeles a huge market, the game was a blowout fairly early on.
In case you're curious, NBC's first broadcast out of the last lockout (obviously in a full, 82-game season) drew a 1.5 overnight with regional coverage -- led by Rangers-Red Wings -- on Jan. 14, 2006.
http://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2013/1/20/3896940/nhl-tv-ratings-2013-opening-dayThe Flyers/Penguins and Kings/Blackhawks actual game coverage (3:30-6 p.m. ET) drew a 2.0 overnight, and peaked at an eye-popping 2.9 later on in the day. The rating was up 67 percent over the NHL on NBC's average for the 2011-12 regular season. It was also up 82 percent from last year's comparable coverage (CHI vs. DET 1/14/12: 1.1 overnight).Here are the top five local markets for NBC's coverage of the NHL yesterday:
1. Pittsburgh - 19.4/38
2. Philadelphia - 7.8/16
3. Chicago - 6.6/15
4. Buffalo - 6.6/13
5. Boston - 2.5/6
End of Line
Posts: 6,867
Jan 21, 2013 4:27pm
People wanted hockey back, and they showed up big time!
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Jan 21, 2013 4:35pm
No octopi on the ice tonight for the CBJ
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Jan 21, 2013 4:59pm
Someone better throw one!gerb131;1371352 wrote:No octopi on the ice tonight for the CBJ
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Jan 21, 2013 6:55pm
As long as its 4-1 CBJ with 4mins left in the 3rd period than I'm ok with that.Classyposter58;1371379 wrote:Someone better throw one!
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 21, 2013 7:40pm
CBJ has a fighting major 0:03 into the home opener. Gloves dropped with the puck, lol
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Jan 21, 2013 8:15pm
Detroit looked a hell of a lot better there than they did the other night. IMO they need to split up Datsyuk and Zetterberg but that line was creating all sorts of havoc, Brunner just needs to finish there. They're improving, a lot of players that need to gel. Watching Toronto/Buffalo on GC, entertaining as well
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Jan 21, 2013 8:54pm
Lots of CBJ penalties and zero offense, lucky to be only 1-0
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Jan 21, 2013 9:09pm
Kyle Quincey is absolutely terrible. Belongs in Toledo, I wouldn't even ruin Grand Rapids with him
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Jan 21, 2013 10:32pm
Boy is it me or does this season have little to no defense? It seems like all these games have been high scoring. They've also been incredibly physical and played hard. I love this shorter season, lets put it at a 66 game max next year
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 21, 2013 10:34pm
If NHL and NBA both cut to 66 it would be awesome IMO, but there's no chance
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Jan 21, 2013 10:36pm
Yeah and I love hockey too so I wouldn't mind a 100 game season to be honest but for stats sake you have to leave it at 82. It's a lot like baseball statistics wise, basketball is more of a per game sport so it would work betterts1227;1371712 wrote:If NHL and NBA both cut to 66 it would be awesome IMO, but there's no chance
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 22, 2013 8:07am
Tuukka Rask is looking solid out of the gate for boston. 1.00 GAA in 2 games. Seguin had some great chances but couldn't capitalize yesterday against the Jets. Hopefully he can get one in soon and get into a rhythm.
T
ThePatriot
Posts: 166
Jan 22, 2013 10:42am
The thing that stood out to me early on this season is the change in mentality in the Buffalo Sabres. Adding Scott and Ott has provided a physical edge they've needed for a long time. Even Drew Stafford stepped up and took on Hartnell (and held his own) after Hartnell ran one of the little guys from Buffalo. Vanek had a big couple of days. They really need him to live up the expectations from early on in his career.
Could have a solid team in Buffalo which is good b/c it's a great hockey city.
Could have a solid team in Buffalo which is good b/c it's a great hockey city.
End of Line
Posts: 6,867
Jan 22, 2013 4:26pm
Scott got knocked the fuck out last night.
I have Pominville on my fantasy team, I'm not complaining.
I have Pominville on my fantasy team, I'm not complaining.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 23, 2013 10:44am
Great match up tonight on NBC Sports Network: Bruins vs Rangers in New York. Lundqvist is looking pretty rusty.
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Jan 23, 2013 10:53am
Go anyone playing the Rags (and anyone playing the Kings for that matter). Better first rounders for the Jackets.Raw Dawgin' it;1372761 wrote:Great match up tonight on NBC Sports Network: Bruins vs Rangers in New York. Lundqvist is looking pretty rusty.
End of Line
Posts: 6,867
Jan 23, 2013 4:09pm
Rags have no depth that's their issue. They got rid of depth for the most overrated player in the league.
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Jan 23, 2013 5:45pm
Yeah Detroit has always placed the highest value on puck possessors. They just don't have the scorers this season that they normally haveEnd of Line;1371334 wrote:Holland really doesn't like grinders on his team, never really has. He needs to add toughness to the lineup, other than Tootoo.
BGFalcons82
Posts: 2,173
Jan 23, 2013 5:46pm
Exactly!gorocks99;1372771 wrote:Go anyone playing the Rags (and anyone playing the Kings for that matter). Better first rounders for the Jackets.
