bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Dec 28, 2012 11:57am
Manhattan Buckeye;1351815 wrote:Bear in mind (and I'm not really all of this into the story), it sounds like the people that are claiming he committed any sort of crime, have themselves admitted to committing crimes.
It would be as if a burglar of my home threatened to reveal that I had a Breaking Bad-esque meth lab that he noticed while he was stealing stuff from me. Not exactly a great witness for any sort of prosecution. For all we know (and I know nothing, because the story stinks from both sides and I don't care enough about Steubenville football) they are building a libel case.
So you're saying he's basically admitting guilt on the child porn but is hoping a court views it as ok because it was obtained illegally?
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Dec 28, 2012 11:58am
Because if I don't have child porn and am being accused of having child porn, I have no reason to not say, I don't have child porn. I don't need lawyer to say I don't have child porn if I don't have child porn.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Dec 28, 2012 12:00pm
He should be far more afraid of calling this Anonymous group liars than anything the police may or may not find. He isn't going to win an internet posting battle against these people.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Dec 28, 2012 12:02pm
Where did he admit anything?bases_loaded;1351820 wrote:So you're saying he's basically admitting guilt on the child **** but is hoping a court views it as ok because it was obtained illegally?
If so, I haven't read it here.
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Dec 28, 2012 12:02pm
Lol at his password hint being favorite sports team: big red
Is that even hacking when it's that easy?
Is that even hacking when it's that easy?
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Dec 28, 2012 12:04pm
Manhattan Buckeye;1351825 wrote:Where did he admit anything?
If so, I haven't read it here.
By not responding for a week in my head he's hiding something. The guy is a message board whore and he disappears to lawyer up for a week? If I'm innocent I'm screaming from the roof tops immediately.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Dec 28, 2012 12:05pm
It is a bit like posting a sign on one's house indicating where you hide the key.bases_loaded;1351826 wrote:Lol at his password hint being favorite sports team: big red
Is that even hacking when it's that easy?
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Dec 28, 2012 12:06pm
If the man is innocent, I should feel bad for him. However, I just can't as he's such a d-bag.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Dec 28, 2012 12:08pm
Seems to me that MOW is confused on the timeline. Didn't the NYT article come out first...which led to Anonymous taking interest?
LOL at the media "aiding and abetting" Anonymous. But in my interactions with those fans over there, Steubenville loves the "us against the world" mentality.
LOL at the media "aiding and abetting" Anonymous. But in my interactions with those fans over there, Steubenville loves the "us against the world" mentality.
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Dec 28, 2012 12:08pm
This. He'd be better served to just hunker down and STFU until it hopefully blows over.queencitybuckeye;1351824 wrote:He should be far more afraid of calling this Anonymous group liars than anything the police may or may not find. He isn't going to win an internet posting battle against these people.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Dec 28, 2012 12:11pm
I think you are confusing internet peeing battles with real life consequences.bases_loaded;1351827 wrote:By not responding for a week in my head he's hiding something. The guy is a message board whore and he disappears to lawyer up for a week? If I'm innocent I'm screaming from the roof tops immediately.
If some idiot on the internet said that I have kiddie porn in my house or have in any way, shape or form committed a crime (and trust me, I don't or haven't), I don't respond publicly or in any way directly respond to even dignify it with a response. If I think it would in any way hurt my reputation thus a libel or slander case would be in order, without question I'm shutting up and let the idiot bury himself.
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Dec 28, 2012 12:11pm
Anon isn't happy wtrf won't air his sit down interview because he wouldn't provide his name.
He has summoned naziGods to aid.
Uh oh
He has summoned naziGods to aid.
Uh oh
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Dec 28, 2012 12:18pm
Exactly.Manhattan Buckeye;1351833 wrote:I think you are confusing internet peeing battles with real life consequences.
If some idiot on the internet said that I have kiddie porn in my house or have in any way, shape or form committed a crime (and trust me, I don't or haven't), I don't respond publicly or in any way directly respond to even dignify it with a response. If I think it would in any way hurt my reputation thus a libel or slander case would be in order, without question I'm shutting up and let the idiot bury himself.
MOW just dug himself a deeper hole. "Terrorists" :laugh:
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Dec 28, 2012 12:27pm
What are they going to do, beat them at Risk? Dungeons and Dragons, perhaps summoning some sort of demon while dreaming of sleeping with a woman?bases_loaded;1351834 wrote:Anon isn't happy wtrf won't air his sit down interview because he wouldn't provide his name.
He has summoned naziGods to aid.
Uh oh
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Dec 28, 2012 12:30pm
Manhattan Buckeye;1351842 wrote:What are they going to do, beat them at Risk? Dungeons and Dragons, perhaps summoning some sort of demon while dreaming of sleeping with a woman?
No. Just probably the same stuff they did to MOW.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Dec 28, 2012 12:31pm
Which was?bases_loaded;1351847 wrote:No. Just probably the same stuff they did to MOW.
I don't follow twitter. What exactly did they do?
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Dec 28, 2012 12:32pm
They can access every bit of information that exists on the man. One can do quite a bit of damage with that information.Manhattan Buckeye;1351842 wrote:What are they going to do, beat them at Risk? Dungeons and Dragons, perhaps summoning some sort of demon while dreaming of sleeping with a woman?
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Dec 28, 2012 12:33pm
they hacked rollredroll.com a couple times, putting up their messages and videos. They also locked MOW's email and dumped the contents into a hosted file.Manhattan Buckeye;1351848 wrote:Which was?
I don't follow twitter. What exactly did they do?
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Dec 28, 2012 12:36pm
So they committed a felony in both Federal and Ohio law, most likely. And they are somehow credible. My guess if the Feds even begin to care about this (and IMO they don't), Anonymous is in more trouble than MOW (who the heck is that BTW?).
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Dec 28, 2012 12:37pm
These hacker groups are not not your typical "computer nerds." They have done some serious damage and aren't to be taken lightly.Manhattan Buckeye;1351842 wrote:What are they going to do, beat them at Risk? Dungeons and Dragons, perhaps summoning some sort of demon while dreaming of sleeping with a woman?
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Dec 28, 2012 12:43pm
Has there been any prosecution based on "anonymous", or is it just a reputation hit?
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 28, 2012 12:44pm
Automatik;1351855 wrote:These hacker groups are not not your typical "computer nerds." They have done some serious damage and aren't to be taken lightly.
We heard about how they were going to stop the WBC from showing up at the CT funerals too. How'd that work out?
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Dec 28, 2012 12:45pm
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Dec 28, 2012 12:45pm
It's just a reputation hit. Obviously their methods make prosecution problematic.Manhattan Buckeye;1351859 wrote:Has there been any prosecution based on "anonymous", or is it just a reputation hit?
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
Dec 28, 2012 12:46pm
The point is, you'd still be a felon with a meth labManhattan Buckeye;1351815 wrote:Bear in mind (and I'm not really all of this into the story), it sounds like the people that are claiming he committed any sort of crime, have themselves admitted to committing crimes.
It would be as if a burglar of my home threatened to reveal that I had a Breaking Bad-esque meth lab that he noticed while he was stealing stuff from me. Not exactly a great witness for any sort of prosecution.
Doesn't speak any better of you because someone broke in and found it
You'd still be making meth
I really don't think Anonymous cares a hole bunch about how this is adjudicated. They've formed an opinion that the system is failed, and they're stepping in