Ironman92;1350070 wrote:To insert the "freakin" between the first and last names you must be one of the current or all-time greats....
Examples.....
Willie freakin Mays
Jerry freakin Rice
Larry freakin Bird
Ben freakin Watson
Not examples....
Delino freakin Deshields
Chris freakin Duhon
Reggie freakin Nelson
wes_mantooth;1350076 wrote:Fixed
Not really. Pat hadn't throw in the towel at that point, so anything Denver did was fair game.royal_k;1350179 wrote:Did anyone else find it bush league that Denver was sending safety blitzes under 2:00, and up by 75? Punk-ass play IMO.
Isn't this what they tried to do, though? Luck and RG3 were gone, everyone on this forum shit on Cousins during the weeks leading up to the draft, and it's fair to say we should have drafted Wilson, but he didn't go until the 3rd round to a team with a big money QB, so which scouts honestly expected him to play like this? I'm not trying to argue with you, but they drafted who they thought was the best available QB.SportsAndLady;1349970 wrote:Well don't take fucking Weeden lol everybody knew he was going to suck.
Take best QB available every draft until you get a QB. Look how much better off the Skins are with RG3..you think they care they're not going to be able to add a DE in the first round next year? Or a guard in '14?
SportsAndLady;1350615 wrote:Tannehill would have been best player available at the time of our first pick.
SportsAndLady;1350615 wrote:Tannehill would have been best player available at the time of our first pick.
Look im not going over this again..if you seriously think Weeden has any upside idk what to tell you other than I own some great land for sale in flint Michigan. Pm me if interested.royal_k;1350944 wrote:Because a 30 year old rookie has how much NFL experience?
Agree with you royal_k. Patty boy fucking sucks and ruined his chance at success.royal_k;1350960 wrote:I believe we can agree to disagree. Obviously I feel differently about the QB situation. I don't believe he was put in the best situation to succeed. I think with the right coach and the right offense he can be a very good QB. He's had big success from the shot gun, and the WC offense has none of that. I think you'll see that next year.
Yeah, just imagine what a trainwreck RG3 would have been here. Shurmur would have tried to make him a pocket passer...smhroyal_k;1350965 wrote:Good coaches tailor their schemes to fit their players. Shurmur didn't do that with Weeden or Richardson.
se-alum;1350987 wrote:I don't like Shurmur, but he didn't make Weeden inaccurate and a terrible decision maker.
I'm fine with it as well, just because I don't think there's a QB in this draft that gets the Browns over the hump. I'd prefer to use this draft to fill other posisitons of need, then focus on QB the following year, whether it be through the draft or free agency.Rotinaj;1350996 wrote:Weeden and Shurmur both suck. Even though I don't see Weeden panning out you don't draft a guy in the first round and give up on him after his rookie season. He'll get one more year to prove himself and I'm fine with that.
I agree. The last thing I want is them reaching again...just like they did for Weeden.se-alum;1350997 wrote:I'm fine with it as well, just because I don't think there's a QB in this draft that gets the Browns over the hump. I'd prefer to use this draft to fill other posisitons of need, then focus on QB the following year, whether it be through the draft or free agency.
Wtf are you talking about coa? I literally just said in my previous post im not looking to harp on Weeden. I also never said I wanted them to take tannehill. I just said technically he was the best player available from where we were at.Commander of Awesome;1350958 wrote:LMAO at you suggesting we should have taken Tannyfail though. Would have been same issue with him as Weeden, Patty fuckhead head would have been up his ass and refused to put him in position to succeed. Not sure why Tannyfail would have all of a sudden been all pro with Patty as his OC/HC. Logic fail.