No they wouldn't. It would be a very close game, you obviously haven't seen HD play this season. I'm not saying that HD would win or lose but they would not get killed by Mooney. I've seen both teams play at least 3 times this season.tank2nasty wrote: Just for the record, Mooney would slaughter Davidson!
Yawn. Again.FairwoodKing wrote: I thought it was interesting that the only specific victory of Mooney's that was mentioned was their win over Steubenville. It was almost as though they were saying, "if you can beat the Big Red that badly, then you deserve to be one of the top-ranked teams in the country."
I'd say they did that just to show how badly they beat on one of the teams that was supposed to be one of the 'tougher' games for Mooney.FairwoodKing wrote: I thought it was interesting that the only specific victory of Mooney's that was mentioned was their win over Steubenville. It was almost as though they were saying, "if you can beat the Big Red that badly, then you deserve to be one of the top-ranked teams in the country."
We shut down Massillon and Woodland Hills, so we were one of the "tougher" games for Mooney.GoChiefs wrote:I'd say they did that just to show how badly they beat on one of the teams that was supposed to be one of the 'tougher' games for Mooney.FairwoodKing wrote: I thought it was interesting that the only specific victory of Mooney's that was mentioned was their win over Steubenville. It was almost as though they were saying, "if you can beat the Big Red that badly, then you deserve to be one of the top-ranked teams in the country."
God knows that if you beat the mighty big red you must be the top team in the nation.:rolleyes:d.woods50fan. wrote: I'd really like to see 19 better teams !!! Nice year CARDS !!!
P.S. WE WILL BE BACK .......
I am not a Big Red hater like some on here..but I must laugh at that statement. You surely could not have typed that with a straight face. I mean..what was it..45-7? Come on now. Heck..they only beat 1 or 2 teams this year worst than that.FairwoodKing wrote: We shut down Massillon and Woodland Hills, so we were one of the "tougher" games for Mooney.
Cograts to mooney on a great season and a class act of a program.FairwoodKing wrote:We shut down Massillon and Woodland Hills, so we were one of the "tougher" games for Mooney.GoChiefs wrote:I'd say they did that just to show how badly they beat on one of the teams that was supposed to be one of the 'tougher' games for Mooney.FairwoodKing wrote: I thought it was interesting that the only specific victory of Mooney's that was mentioned was their win over Steubenville. It was almost as though they were saying, "if you can beat the Big Red that badly, then you deserve to be one of the top-ranked teams in the country."
2nd best in Ytown?o.a.b. wrote: top 20 in the nation,2nd best in Youngstown--quite a "feat"
Whenever Ursuline gets close to Mooney they consider that a victory. Thus his reasoning that a three-loss D-V team is better than an undeaten D-III team.genghis dong wrote:2nd best in Ytown?o.a.b. wrote: top 20 in the nation,2nd best in Youngstown--quite a "feat"
Agreed.Elliot Stabler wrote: Mooney and Davidson would have been one of the best games in the country this year
No one is denying that Big Red played a shitty game against Mooney. But at 12-2 and with convincing wins over WPIAL AAAA champ Woodland Hills and Ohio Div. I regional champ Massillon, Big Red was still one of the best teams on Mooney's schedule. This makes Mooney look even better, which is the point to my original post.GoChiefs wrote:I am not a Big Red hater like some on here..but I must laugh at that statement. You surely could not have typed that with a straight face. I mean..what was it..45-7? Come on now. Heck..they only beat 1 or 2 teams this year worst than that.FairwoodKing wrote: We shut down Massillon and Woodland Hills, so we were one of the "tougher" games for Mooney.
