LJ;1349354 wrote:LOL
Great response.
LJ;1349354 wrote:LOL
Tiger2003;1349356 wrote:Thad needs to get some talent.
robj55;1349357 wrote:Look at the positive, we executed fine on offense, we got a ton of open looks in the second half, no one made shots though. Our defense was very good except for the breakdowns on the out of bounds plays.
Tiger2003;1349359 wrote:Great response.
LJ;1349360 wrote:LOL
Tiger2003;1349365 wrote:You act like they are loaded....
Thomas is the only one worth a damn.
My god you are so negative. You're right, no other coaches in the country would take anyone on this team other than Thomas.Tiger2003;1349365 wrote:You act like they are loaded....
Thomas is the only one worth a damn.
It's not a ridiculous point..Outside of Thomas, nobody on this OSU team scares anyoneLJ;1349367 wrote:LOL
SportsAndLady;1349370 wrote:It's not a ridiculous point..Outside of Thomas, nobody on this OSU team scares anyone
No it isn't. And Thomas is overrated. I'll be happy to just make the tournament this year.LJ;1349373 wrote:But its not because they lack talent. No one has put it all together yet. This team is loaded with McDonalds aa's
And yet we shoot 30% and are within 7, basketball has nothing to do with who scares someone. For not scaring anyone our guys got wide open looks all game. Quit crying.Tiger2003;1349377 wrote:Holy **** people nobody on Ohio State roster besides Thomas scares anyone. Get the nuts out of your mouths and the blinders off.
So was Perry Ellis.LJ;1349373 wrote:But its not because they lack talent. No one has put it all together yet. This team is loaded with McDonalds aa's
SportsAndLady;1349382 wrote:So was Perry Ellis.
Just because they were McD's AA, doesn't mean they're going to be worth a damn.
It's a talent issue in Columbus
robj55;1349379 wrote:And yet we shoot 30% and are within 7, basketball has nothing to do with who scares someone. For not scaring anyone our guys got wide open looks all game. Quit crying.
CongratsSportsAndLady;1349388 wrote:Self>>>>>>Matta
3 in a row against them Bucks
LJ;1349384 wrote:Disagree but ok.