Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Mar 29, 2017 1:44pm
majorspark;1844642 wrote:Feloniously leak selected portions with the intent of taking out a political opponent and inflicting political damage on the current administration.
Ahhh c'mon ............they wouldn't do that.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Apr 3, 2017 11:46am
So... is Susan Rice an attention whore or just a gullible dupe?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 3, 2017 11:59am
She is an idiot, but what is the new story of the day?CenterBHSFan;1845405 wrote:So... is Susan Rice an attention whore or just a gullible dupe?
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Apr 3, 2017 12:05pm
like_that;1845408 wrote:She is an idiot, but what is the new story of the day?
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-03/top-obama-adviser-sought-names-of-trump-associates-in-intel
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Apr 3, 2017 12:20pm
I am going with calculating partisan operative.CenterBHSFan;1845405 wrote:So... is Susan Rice an attention whore or just a gullible dupe?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 3, 2017 12:24pm
I think both sides are biting off more than they can chew with this shit. They better be careful.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Apr 3, 2017 12:26pm
I'm not sure, but I'm going to guess transition activities always include conversations with domestic AND foreign entities. It's not technically legal, and mostly makes sense as a policy, but I'm sure stuff like what Flynn did happens with every incoming administration.
You're not supposed to unmask those US citizens, period. If some concern (which the left was very capable of working itself into, not unlike birthergate) about Trump and his team weighed on that choice to unmask, that only further heightens the problem into a political one.
It's all sounding more and more like you're typical community organizer "Rules for Radicals" - you lost your election and your legacy is going to be dismantled, all you can do is hope to undermine and invalidate the agenda any way you can.
You're not supposed to unmask those US citizens, period. If some concern (which the left was very capable of working itself into, not unlike birthergate) about Trump and his team weighed on that choice to unmask, that only further heightens the problem into a political one.
It's all sounding more and more like you're typical community organizer "Rules for Radicals" - you lost your election and your legacy is going to be dismantled, all you can do is hope to undermine and invalidate the agenda any way you can.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Apr 3, 2017 12:29pm
I like how she lied through her teeth, again, about not knowing anything. In her defense, maybe she is just a decent, honest person who struggled to keep up with Obama and Clinton.majorspark;1845413 wrote:I am going with calculating partisan operative.
I'm thinking Trump should have the IRS audit her every year for life.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Apr 3, 2017 2:22pm
Multiple sources tell Fox News that Susan Rice, former national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to unmask the names of Trump transition officials caught up in surveillance.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Apr 4, 2017 10:42am
https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view
CNN: racing MSNBC to the bottom.
CNN: racing MSNBC to the bottom.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Apr 4, 2017 1:53pm
And what we are seeing clear as day, now, is that the mainstream media are all completely in the tank for the Dems, never criticizing the Obama administration and covering their eyes and ears at every scandal.QuakerOats;1845770 wrote:https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view
CNN: racing MSNBC to the bottom.
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Apr 4, 2017 2:12pm
Suffice to say that CNN can do whatever they like...that doesn't change the fact that Ms. Rice has a problem on her hands.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Apr 4, 2017 2:13pm
CNN has long surpassed MSNBC as the bottom of the pond.QuakerOats;1845770 wrote:https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view
CNN: racing MSNBC to the bottom.
As per the article you linked:
UPDATE: In an interview on MSNBC addressing this story, Susan Rice has now confirmed she unmasked Trump campaign officials, but is denying doing so for political reasons.
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Apr 4, 2017 3:08pm
LOL. A week ago she denied knowing anything about unmasking of Trump officials.UPDATE: [FONT="]In an interview on MSNBC addressing this story, [/FONT]Susan Rice has now confirmed[FONT="] she unmasked Trump campaign officials, but is [/FONT][FONT="]denying doing so for political reasons[/FONT][FONT="].[/FONT]
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Apr 4, 2017 3:25pm
It's pretty clear, with that EO Obama signed in his final days allowing unprecedented intel sharing between groups, that it was political. Why would you be worried about the Trump team "erasing" the data when that data is not admissible? You couldn't use that intel in any prosecution because it would have been illegally collected without a warrant. So the only logical explanation is they set it up for that information to be leaked with the sole purpose to damage the Trump administration.majorspark;1845826 wrote:LOL. A week ago she denied knowing anything about unmasking of Trump officials.
There's still been nothing found with respect to collusion between the Trump team and Russia. This whole other thing was merely to provide some smoke so their sympathizers in the media could shout "FIRE! FIRE!".
iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Apr 4, 2017 7:00pm
Gender pay equality day today... the hoax continues. Morons
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Apr 4, 2017 7:07pm
Hopefully Susan Rice was paid considerably less than the average male spy.iclfan2;1845865 wrote:Gender pay equality day today... the hoax continues. Morons
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Apple
Posts: 2,620
Apr 4, 2017 7:28pm
Indeed!fish82;1845818 wrote:Suffice to say that CNN can do whatever they like...that doesn't change the fact that Ms. Rice has a problem on her hands.
Spock
Posts: 2,853
Apr 4, 2017 9:03pm
Susan Rice is a political scum hack
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Apr 4, 2017 9:30pm
I happened to read an article about this on Engadget (which, for some reason, has decided they're qualified to write about anything other than the technology part of tech).iclfan2;1845865 wrote:Gender pay equality day today... the hoax continues. Morons
Comments were LOL hilarious with your typical SJW woman accusing detractors of "mansplaining" when it was pointed out the gap virtually disappears when controlled for all factors. Then you had the artful deflection to "well, we need more and longer paid maternity leave".
iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Apr 4, 2017 9:50pm
Yea, it's pretty funny to hear the uneducated and ignorant people try to defend flawed logic. The best part is people like Keith Ellison and other dumbass congress people (looking at you Warren) also try to push it as fact.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Apr 4, 2017 9:53pm
To be fair, it is a fact in Warren's office.iclfan2;1845900 wrote:Yea, it's pretty funny to hear the uneducated and ignorant people try to defend flawed logic. The best part is people like Keith Ellison and other dumbass congress people (looking at you Warren) also try to push it as fact.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Apr 5, 2017 6:39am
I can't help but recall the article in the WaPo where a writer said:
"What did Obama know and when did he know it? Answer: Not much and about a minute ago."
I have a feeling that this will be called into play before long.
"What did Obama know and when did he know it? Answer: Not much and about a minute ago."
I have a feeling that this will be called into play before long.
Spock
Posts: 2,853
Apr 5, 2017 7:43am
The way the dems are doing politics......Trump wins again easily om 2020
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 5, 2017 8:13am
I honestly doubt anything comes out of this. There are a lot of hypocrites in politics, but none more than the Obama sheep (I classify the media into the sheep group as well). They will do anything to protect his legacy. They are more concerned with treating him like a star and worrying about his "ranking" instead of knowing the truth.CenterBHSFan;1845934 wrote:I can't help but recall the article in the WaPo where a writer said:
"What did Obama know and when did he know it? Answer: Not much and about a minute ago."
I have a feeling that this will be called into play before long.
Remember when truth mattered? Good times.