2016

Home Archive Politics 2016
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 7, 2012 11:13 PM
isadore;1315641 wrote:gosh a ruddies, kerry was a loser, gore had the most people voting for him. he got cheated.
Good to know you voted for Bush.
Nov 7, 2012 11:13pm
password's avatar

password

Senior Member

2,360 posts
Nov 7, 2012 11:14 PM
Mrs. Obama will be running in 2016, take it to the bank.
Nov 7, 2012 11:14pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Nov 8, 2012 8:17 AM
isadore;1315630 wrote:gosh a ruddies we smart people knew our candidate, our first African American President, was going to win. The less smart, a euphemism for stupid, people thought their candidate Mitt Romney would win, you were wrong. Gosh it was a stupid decision to support him, a loser.
Ever here the quote "Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt"?
Nov 8, 2012 8:17am
S

Sonofanump

Nov 8, 2012 8:30 AM
This thread is worthless, no election will be had in 2016 under the socialist dictatorship of the current regime. If an election does take place, it will be just a walk through after term limits are abolished.
Nov 8, 2012 8:30am
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
Nov 8, 2012 8:45 AM
Sonofanump;1315729 wrote:This thread is worthless, no election will be had in 2016 under the socialist dictatorship of the current regime. If an election does take place, it will be just a walk through after term limits are abolished.
Hahahaha hilarious!
Nov 8, 2012 8:45am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Nov 8, 2012 8:47 AM
WebFire;1315720 wrote:Ever here the quote "Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt"?
but gosh a ruddies you keep talking, wow. you know what you inflict your views on our nation. of course they have been rejected by the American people. but reading your views does help drive people to Barack Obama.
Nov 8, 2012 8:47am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Nov 8, 2012 8:56 AM
isadore;1315739 wrote:but gosh a ruddies you keep talking, wow. you know what you inflict your views on our nation. of course they have been rejected by the American people. but reading your views does help drive people to Barack Obama.
Gullible much?
Nov 8, 2012 8:56am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Nov 8, 2012 9:05 AM
WebFire;1315744 wrote:Gullible much?
gullible is believing that the Republican party actually cares about average working people in this country.
Nov 8, 2012 9:05am
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Nov 8, 2012 9:08 AM
isadore;1315751 wrote:gullible is believing that the Democratic party actually cares about average working people in this country.
Indeed.
Nov 8, 2012 9:08am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Nov 8, 2012 9:19 AM
justincredible;1315753 wrote:Indeed.
obviously you have spent to much time in front of a computer screen so that you are unable to recognize compassion, caring and tolerance for those Americans who do not happen to be in the 1%. The Democratic party, the party of the people as this election has shown.
Nov 8, 2012 9:19am
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
Nov 8, 2012 9:22 AM
Maybe if the party of "no" will show up and vote in 2016 they may have a chance. Most of them stayed home in 2012 becoming the party of "no show".
Nov 8, 2012 9:22am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Nov 8, 2012 9:34 AM
isadore;1315751 wrote:gullible is believing that the Republican party actually cares about average working people in this country.
Yes Obama cares so much that the average workers health insurance will rise to unprecedented cost. Thanks!
Nov 8, 2012 9:34am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Nov 8, 2012 9:39 AM
WebFire;1315764 wrote:Yes Obama cares so much that the average workers health insurance will rise to unprecedented cost. Thanks!
gosh a ruddies what he has done is make sure more Americans will have medical coverage, something Republicans are obviously indifferent to.
Nov 8, 2012 9:39am
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Nov 8, 2012 9:44 AM
isadore;1315768 wrote:gosh a ruddies what he has done is make sure more Americans will have medical coverage, something Republicans are obviously indifferent to.
Perhaps if the govt got the fuck out of the health care industry it would be affordable for everyone.
Nov 8, 2012 9:44am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Nov 8, 2012 9:51 AM
justincredible;1315773 wrote:Perhaps if the govt got the **** out of the health care industry it would be affordable for everyone.
only in the fantasy land of free market healthcare where the poor will not need to live and breath.
Nov 8, 2012 9:51am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Nov 8, 2012 10:33 AM
isadore;1315782 wrote:only in the fantasy land of free market healthcare where the poor will not need to live and breath.
Only in fantasy land (or socialism land, your choice) do we have the money to give everyone healthcare. And gov't being in healthcare usually doesn't mean good healthcare.
Nov 8, 2012 10:33am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Nov 8, 2012 10:55 AM
WebFire;1315824 wrote:Only in fantasy land (or socialism land, your choice) do we have the money to give everyone healthcare. And gov't being in healthcare usually doesn't mean good healthcare.
gosh a ruddies nations like norway, sweden, denmark, netherlands, germany, canada all seem to be able to provided medical care for their citizens, we should be able to do it.
Nov 8, 2012 10:55am
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Nov 8, 2012 10:59 AM
isadore;1315846 wrote:gosh a ruddies nations like norway, sweden, denmark, netherlands, germany, canada all seem to be able to provided medical care for their citizens, we should be able to do it.
It helps with the US subsidizing the R&D costs.
Nov 8, 2012 10:59am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Nov 8, 2012 11:14 AM
isadore;1315846 wrote:gosh a ruddies nations like norway, sweden, denmark, netherlands, germany, canada all seem to be able to provided medical care for their citizens, we should be able to do it.
SMH
Nov 8, 2012 11:14am
S

Sonofanump

Nov 8, 2012 11:22 AM
isadore;1315846 wrote:gosh a ruddies nations like norway, sweden, denmark, netherlands, germany, canada all seem to be able to provided medical care for their citizens, we should be able to do it.
Derp, that is why foreigners come to the US for treatment. Does the Saudi Price fly to Norway or Germany for his treatment? Gosh a ruddies no.
Nov 8, 2012 11:22am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Nov 8, 2012 12:38 PM
Sonofanump;1315873 wrote:Derp, that is why foreigners come to the US for treatment. Does the Saudi Price fly to Norway or Germany for his treatment? Gosh a ruddies no.
gosh a ruddies I don't know about "the Saudi Price" but i do know the average German or Norwegian lives longer than the average American. I know a baby born in Germany or Norway has a better chance of survival than one born in the United States. In both countries better care at a lower cost.
Nov 8, 2012 12:38pm
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Nov 8, 2012 12:40 PM
gut;1315849 wrote:It helps with the US subsidizing the R&D costs.
gosh a ruddies we must be pretty stupid for doing that because of how our government allows drug companies and others to rip us off.
Nov 8, 2012 12:40pm
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Nov 8, 2012 12:51 PM
isadore;1315922 wrote:gosh a ruddies we must be pretty stupid for doing that because of how our government allows drug companies and others to rip us off.
Yeah, that's what it means to subsidize something. They make their profit in the US because they're squeezed elsewhere by these nationalized plans.

What that ultimately means is, yes, you'll be able to get "affordable" treatment, there just won't be any good drugs to treat you with because there's no money in it. They've already been chopping R&D investment for years and Obamakare will only make that worse.
Nov 8, 2012 12:51pm
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Nov 8, 2012 1:29 PM
gut;1315934 wrote:Yeah, that's what it means to subsidize something. They make their profit in the US because they're squeezed elsewhere by these nationalized plans.

What that ultimately means is, yes, you'll be able to get "affordable" treatment, there just won't be any good drugs to treat you with because there's no money in it. They've already been chopping R&D investment for years and Obamakare will only make that worse.
no it would mean they would have to spread the cost around more evenly to other nations rather than inflict it only on Americans.
Nov 8, 2012 1:29pm
S

Sonofanump

Nov 8, 2012 3:48 PM
isadore;1315973 wrote:no it would mean they would have to spread the cost around more evenly rather than inflicted on Americans.
Tell me moar!
Nov 8, 2012 3:48pm