Remarkable, imo, yes.wildcats20;1329019 wrote:The suspension was upheld for the 2 IU guys right?
I would agree with this. The Hoosiers are unquestionably the best team in the country when they are burying the three ball. They just have so many weapons from out there.Laley23;1329018 wrote:When IU defends and shoots like this, they are unbeatable.
No. They actually have no depth. Seriously they've only got about 6 guys that Beilein will want to use in big games. Luckily they're slow pace(they're 327th in tempo) should allow all of their players to play 35 minutes a night. You can't win a title doing that though, OSU in 2010 tried it and failedWebFire;1320172 wrote:It is early for sure. But after just a few games...WOW. The freshman are better than expected, and expectations were high. GRIII is lights out good. And the returning players have all upped their game. Hardaway is legit now, and Morgan looks great. Adding Horford back in is huge.
The thing that will make the difference for this team is depth. This team has serious depth.
I don't hesitate to say this is the most talent in AA since the Fab 5.
Read MGoBlog much?Classyposter58;1338206 wrote:No. They actually have no depth. Seriously they've only got about 6 guys that Beilein will want to use in big games. Luckily they're slow pace(they're 327th in tempo) should allow all of their players to play 35 minutes a night. You can't win a title doing that though, OSU in 2010 tried it and failed
Right now I'd say it's..
1. Indiana
2. Ohio State
3. Michigan
4. Minnesota
5. Illinois
6. Michigan State
7. Iowa
8. Wisconsin
9. Purdue
10. Northwestern
12. Penn State and Nebraska
WebFire;1338370 wrote:Read MGoBlog much?
They have more depth than previous seasons. I don't cringe when most of the guys come in off the bench. Switch OSU and Michigan. Nothing I've see so far shows me OSU is better than Michigan.
Is this a joke? Against your one quality opponent, NC State, you had 6 scorers. Ohio State had 8 scorers against Duke and all had at least double digit minutes. Maybe UM has quality depth against Oakland but to say they're deep is a total lieWebFire;1338370 wrote:Read MGoBlog much?
They have more depth than previous seasons. I don't cringe when most of the guys come in off the bench. Switch OSU and Michigan. Nothing I've see so far shows me OSU is better than Michigan.
Wait, you're ripping on UM for quality opponents? LOL. Just told me everything I need to know about your knowledge.Classyposter58;1338430 wrote:Is this a joke? Against your one quality opponent, NC State, you had 6 scorers. Ohio State had 8 scorers against Duke and all had at least double digit minutes. Maybe UM has quality depth against Oakland but to say they're deep is a total lie
No? I compared they're depth against a good team where they couldn't put their bench in at half to when OSU played Duke, who if you were wondering is a good teamWebFire;1338432 wrote:Wait, you're ripping on UM for quality opponents? LOL. Just told me everything I need to know about your knowledge.
:laugh:They didn't do anything else out there either. But yeah when you're 7th or 8th guy can add 6 points that usually shows they're a quality playerWebFire;1338433 wrote:So depth is only measure by scoring. Got it. Here I though there were other elements to the game.
I see. So Duke only had 6 scorers against OSU and won. Michigan had 6 scorers against NC State and won. Yes, I am really worried! Maybe if Michigan would have had 2 guys score 4 points and 1 score 5 against NC State like OSU did against Duke, they would blown them out!Classyposter58;1338438 wrote::laugh:They didn't do anything else out there either. But yeah when you're 7th or 8th guy can add 6 points that usually shows they're a quality player
Well you're the one who brought up how deep Michigan is and clearly it's far from the truth. Are you honestly telling me in a tight game in Lansing you would count on anyone other than the starters and McGary?WebFire;1338449 wrote:I see. So Duke only had 6 scorers against OSU and won. Michigan had 6 scorers against NC State and won. Yes, I am really worried! Maybe if Michigan would have had 2 guys score 4 points and 1 score 5 against NC State like OSU did against Duke, they would blown them out!
Haha, just stop dude.
I have. Depth wise I don't see that much of a difference between last year and this season, but they're starting 5 is betterWebFire;1338458 wrote:Jesus dude ****ing read some.
You're welcome. I'll be here all seasonWebFire;1338467 wrote:Ok thanks for your input.