prescott wrote:"To phrase it differently, you have no idea at all."
Let us see what we know.
1. Thomas bought 100k worth of jewelry while a student/ athlete at duke.
2. Thomas paid 30k, but was sued for 67k by the jeweler for non-payment.
3.Thomas satisfied his debt, but with a confidentiality clause.
4. Wonder what he is hiding?
1. While that is what the jeweler claimed in the original suit, we don't actually know the whole story behind everything that happened because we do not know what was reached by the settlement agreement. How do we know that Thomas, while still foolish for purchasing any amount jewelry over a few thousand dollars; $30,000 is just lunacy -- wasn't the victim of some sort of untoward contract manipulation aimed to eventually shake him down (i.e. the jewelry was actually never worth $100,000). That might explain why Thomas refused to ever pay the difference, even after making hundreds of thousands last year alone with the New Orleans Hornets and in a position to certainly do so. The point being really that we do not know what happened.
2. See above.
3. This proves nothing since we don't even know what the settlement was.
4. At the moment, he isn't hiding anything. Terms of confidentiality are customary practice. But perhaps he just wants to keep his private matters private. Whether Thomas was involved in any illicit activity or not, the fact that he was ever even in this predicament is highly embarrassing and I am sure he doesn't want any more attention for it. He has said that he will talk with the NCAA as soon as the settlement is finalized. He's not running from it.
prescott wrote:BTW, why would Maggette get shafted by Piggie? Piggie admitted to dispersing 36k.He admitted giving that money to five players.Why should we believe that Maggette got less than the others? Take Maggette's word? C'mon.
We aren't taking Maggette's word. Piggie claimed he gave Maggette $2,000. And that's all we can go on.