sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Oct 13, 2012 11:02pm
Still haven't seen the play. But I can't tell from that gif since the POV of the camera isn't straight down the line.
I was listening on the radio on the way to my show. The announcers were from the Stanford feed and they were furious. It made me laugh pretty hard.
I was listening on the radio on the way to my show. The announcers were from the Stanford feed and they were furious. It made me laugh pretty hard.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Oct 13, 2012 11:15pm
karen lotz;1294564 wrote:Not the kind of game you want to watch on your phone at a wedding reception while the maid of honor is giving her speech, but I'll take it.
Lol
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 13, 2012 11:31pm
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 14, 2012 12:02am
Cool!
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Oct 14, 2012 7:46am
LJ;1294595 wrote:
How many times are you going to post this?
.jpg)
september63
Posts: 5,789
Oct 14, 2012 8:40am
Why would ND fans storm the field? You were a double digit favorite.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 14, 2012 8:48am
I don't have a tweet to post for the 9th time, but a former ref on sports center said it was the correct call.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Oct 14, 2012 8:50am
september63;1294814 wrote:Why would ND fans storm the field? You were a double digit favorite.
Because it was a big win against a team that has owned them in recent years? Also, pretty sure ND was an 8-point favorite.
september63
Posts: 5,789
Oct 14, 2012 8:57am
You are right. That line started at 10 and ended at 8.killer_ewok;1294819 wrote:Because it was a big win against a team that has owned them in recent years? Also, pretty sure ND was an 8-point favorite.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Oct 14, 2012 9:05am
Of course I picked Stanford in my pick 'em.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Oct 14, 2012 9:54am
The last laughs of the evening for anyone.sherm03;1294569 wrote:Still haven't seen the play. But I can't tell from that gif since the POV of the camera isn't straight down the line.
I was listening on the radio on the way to my show. The announcers were from the Stanford feed and they were furious. It made me laugh pretty hard.
/sleepered
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 10:17am
Just like fans of OSU and Miami in 2002, ND fans will say correct call, Stanford fans will say bad call. Also, some refs say correct call, and some refs say incorrect call. ND won, they're 6-0, end of story.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Oct 14, 2012 10:18am
Tis true.vball10set;1294848 wrote:Just like fans of OSU and Miami in 2002, ND fans will say correct call, Stanford fans will say bad call. Also, some refs say correct call, and some refs say incorrect call. ND won, they're 6-0, end of story.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Oct 14, 2012 10:24am
They use Gerry Austin for MNF, was it him? Just curious.karen lotz;1294818 wrote:I don't have a tweet to post for the 9th time, but a former ref on sports center said it was the correct call.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 14, 2012 11:00am
ts1227;1294852 wrote:They use Gerry Austin for MNF, was it him? Just curious.
no idea, I was watching/listening while falling asleep on couch.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 14, 2012 11:02am
Dave Cutaia. It just happened to be on College Football Final when I turned it on.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Oct 14, 2012 11:02am
Yeah, I just saw it tookaren lotz;1294873 wrote:Dave Cutaia. It just happened to be on College Football Final when I turned it on.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Oct 14, 2012 12:17pm
I finally got to see the play. I'll be honest, I can understand why Stanford fans are pissed. It is really close. I can see why they didn't give him the touchdown in real time. And the replays don't show a good enough angle to overturn.
That call could easily have gone either way. It's easy to say it when the call goes your teams' way, but it's the truth. And the bottom line is, Stanford had four plays from inside the Irish 5, and two of those plays from inside the 1. In that type of position, you can't leave doubt. You can't put yourself in a position where it comes down to a call from the officials.
I wouldn't say the call was wrong. But I wouldn't say the call was right. It could have gone either way. And there were going to be people pissed off no matter what happened. I'm just glad that I'm not on the pissed off side.
That call could easily have gone either way. It's easy to say it when the call goes your teams' way, but it's the truth. And the bottom line is, Stanford had four plays from inside the Irish 5, and two of those plays from inside the 1. In that type of position, you can't leave doubt. You can't put yourself in a position where it comes down to a call from the officials.
I wouldn't say the call was wrong. But I wouldn't say the call was right. It could have gone either way. And there were going to be people pissed off no matter what happened. I'm just glad that I'm not on the pissed off side.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Oct 14, 2012 12:39pm
sherm03;1294917 wrote:I finally got to see the play. I'll be honest, I can understand why Stanford fans are pissed. It is really close. I can see why they didn't give him the touchdown in real time. And the replays don't show a good enough angle to overturn.
That call could easily have gone either way. It's easy to say it when the call goes your teams' way, but it's the truth. And the bottom line is, Stanford had four plays from inside the Irish 5, and two of those plays from inside the 1. In that type of position, you can't leave doubt. You can't put yourself in a position where it comes down to a call from the officials.
I wouldn't say the call was wrong. But I wouldn't say the call was right. It could have gone either way. And there were going to be people pissed off no matter what happened. I'm just glad that I'm not on the pissed off side.
Great post.
athlete37
Posts: 992
Oct 14, 2012 1:08pm
I love how people talk about this like Stanford was down four to end the game and this would've served Notre Dame a loss. The facts are that Notre Dame was ahead seven points anyway and had Stanford scored somehow there, they would've had to turn around and try to do it again (good luck) with ND taking the advantageous position in the second overtime of having the ball second. Likely story in that case? SAME RESULT
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Oct 14, 2012 1:09pm
athlete37;1294986 wrote:I love how people talk about this like Stanford was down four to end the game and this would've served Notre Dame a loss. The facts are that Notre Dame was ahead seven points anyway and had Stanford scored somehow there, they would've had to turn around and try to do it again (good luck) with ND taking the advantageous position in the second overtime of having the ball second. Likely story in that case? SAME RESULT
Lol. No. No one will ever know how the game should have ended.
S
Sonofanump
Oct 14, 2012 1:36pm
I do not see the runners elbow. I can see why there is not enough evidence to overturn the play. Tough call. Enjoy the rest of your day.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 16, 2012 9:40am
Here are some pretty pictures for people still struggling with the call on 4th down. There are some words too, so hopefully no one gets confused.
Sonofanump...do the side judges normally run in from the sideline and mark a spot without blowing their whistle/signalling forward progress stopped?
Sonofanump...do the side judges normally run in from the sideline and mark a spot without blowing their whistle/signalling forward progress stopped?
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Oct 16, 2012 10:01am
^^^reps.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 16, 2012 10:03am
lol--ND won, 'nuff said, move on