sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 8, 2012 3:51pm
I am whatever the forum needs.Raw Dawgin' it;1242711 wrote:Nothing wrong with being the forum retard, sleeper. you know what they say "every village needs an idiot"
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 8, 2012 3:51pm
Except a black person. I cannot do that.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Aug 8, 2012 5:18pm
yeah I still haven't got a legit answer to my ban length.
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Aug 8, 2012 5:39pm
DeyDurkie5;1242845 wrote:yeah I still haven't got a legit answer to my ban length.
It's because you lie about the length of your e penis.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 9, 2012 10:40am
How's that experiment coming o-trap? Come up with a number that defends your argument yet?
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 10:53am
I'll let you know around 6pm, since that was roundabout the original time the first number was figured.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 10:59am
For what it's worth, Day 1 of the experiment was about 11% lower than the historical average.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 11:02am
Scratch that. Closer to 12%.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 9, 2012 11:06am
So it was in actuality about 50% lower?
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 11:13am
Where the hell did you get 50%?
Approximately 1,083 posts in the first 24 hours compared to the average of 1,228.46. That is 145.46 posts fewer than an average day, or about 1 fewer than the average for every 10 minutes of the day.
Approximately 1,083 posts in the first 24 hours compared to the average of 1,228.46. That is 145.46 posts fewer than an average day, or about 1 fewer than the average for every 10 minutes of the day.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 9, 2012 11:15am
And an 12% decrease means growing forum? Only on the OC...O-Trap;1243128 wrote:Where the hell did you get 50%?
Approximately 1,083 posts in the first 24 hours compared to the average of 1,228.46. That is 145.46 posts fewer than an average day, or about 1 fewer than the average for every 10 minutes of the day.
SnotBubbles
Posts: 4,492
Aug 9, 2012 11:15am
What's an e penis?
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 11:17am
Who said it was growing?sleeper;1243130 wrote:And an 12% decrease means growing forum? Only on the OC...
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 11:17am
You really are one friggin' weird guy.SnotBubbles;1243131 wrote:What's an e penis?
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 9, 2012 11:23am
A forum is either growing, stagnate, or declining. You have made the argument that it is growing based on your new 32 members with at least one post. I have said otherwise and the data supports my observation.O-Trap;1243136 wrote:Who said it was growing?
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Aug 9, 2012 11:28am
*stagnant
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 9, 2012 11:30am
Stagnated.queencitybuckeye;1243143 wrote:*stagnant
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 11:32am
I didn't say it was growing. Those are gross additions. I said nothing of the actual net additions, except that if the gross attrition for that same time frame is at or less than 32, then there has been active member growth for that time frame.sleeper;1243142 wrote:You have made the argument that it is growing based on your new 32 members with at least one post. I have said otherwise and the data supports my observation.
For your comprehension:
1. Member growth doesn't necessarily equate to larger post counts.
2. Member attrition is virtually impossible to quantify given the metrics available for a forum, as most will just stop posting without closing an account.
3. My point was that we don't all necessarily see the growth or attrition unless it is drastic. Those little 32 posters are not drastic, and neither, I don't believe, is the effect from most posters who have ceased posting.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 11:34am
I don't believe this is the adjective. I believe QCB was correct.sleeper;1243145 wrote:Stagnated.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 9, 2012 11:36am
By this we can conclude that at best the forum is stagnant.O-Trap;1243147 wrote:I didn't say it was growing. Those are gross additions. I said nothing of the actual net additions, except that if the gross attrition for that same time frame is at or less than 32, then there has been active member growth for that time frame.
For your comprehension:
1. Member growth doesn't necessarily equate to larger post counts.
2. Member attrition is virtually impossible to quantify given the metrics available for a forum, as most will just stop posting without closing an account.
3. My point was that we don't all necessarily see the growth or attrition unless it is drastic. Those little 32 posters are not drastic, and neither, I don't believe, is the effect from most posters who have ceased posting.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 9, 2012 11:36am
QCB should get a life instead of pointing out grammatical errors on a casual internet forum.O-Trap;1243148 wrote:I don't believe this is the adjective. I believe QCB was correct.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 11:38am
It might be, or it may have even declined some, but I'm willing to bet that the numbers won't reflect a drop of drastic proportions.sleeper;1243150 wrote:By this we can conclude that at best the forum is stagnant.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Aug 9, 2012 11:40am
*Internetsleeper;1243151 wrote:QCB should get a life instead of pointing out grammatical errors on a casual internet forum.
It seemed appropriate.
In any case, I certainly hope you don't leave. When you're not trolling, the conversation you bring to the table is good stuff.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Aug 9, 2012 11:43am
I'm too lazy for that, can I just lie about my investments instead?sleeper;1243151 wrote:QCB should get a life instead of pointing out grammatical errors on a casual internet forum.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Aug 9, 2012 11:46am
I don't know why you want to lie about your personal investments, but feel free.queencitybuckeye;1243157 wrote:I'm too lazy for that, can I just lie about my investments instead?