Home▸Archive▸High School Football▸Suggested rules changes for NFHS 2010
Refman
Senior Member
R
114posts
R
Refman
Senior Member
114
posts
Thu, Dec 17, 2009 10:09 PMDec 17, 2009 10:09 PM
The NFHS sends this out to coaches and referees every year...this is suggestions for 2010.
1. Double fouls when the ball is dead would offset as opposed to separate and in order.
2. Changing the definition of a chop block to eliminate the requirement that the low block be delayed to be illegal.
3. Changing the definition of a chop block to only restrict the high/low combination (low/low would be legal).
4. Changing the kickoff to the 35-yard line.
5. Allowing corporate advertising to be on the field of play if in compliance with other Rule 1-2 restrictions.
6. Removing the restriction that football jerseys have to be tucked in if longer than the top of the pant.
7. Requiring a minimum number of players on either side of the kicker on a free kick.
8. Further clarifying the use of electronic equipment during a contest.
9. Eliminating the five-yard face-mask foul.
10. Removing the penalty-marker colored restrictions on football gloves and pads.
Dec 17, 2009 10:09pm
newarkcatholicfan
Senior Member
3,199posts
newarkcatholicfan
Senior Member
3,199
posts
Thu, Dec 17, 2009 10:28 PMDec 17, 2009 10:28 PM
I like 4 and 9.
Dec 17, 2009 10:28pm
bigkahuna
Senior Member
B
4,454posts
B
bigkahuna
Senior Member
4,454
posts
Fri, Dec 18, 2009 11:10 AMDec 18, 2009 11:10 AM
The worst one on here is #6 For the love of God keep your shirt tail tucked in. If it gets pulled out then tuck it back in when you get a chance. I hate seeing players with jerseys hanging down to their knees. I know it sounds dumb to get mad about but show some respect and have some class.
Dec 18, 2009 11:10am
GoChiefs
Resident Maniac
16,754posts
GoChiefs
Resident Maniac
16,754
posts
Fri, Dec 18, 2009 2:41 PMDec 18, 2009 2:41 PM
Doesn't make a difference to me either way..but what the heck does a tucked in jersey have to do with respect or class?? This is a football game..not a meeting with the President.
Dec 18, 2009 2:41pm
bigorangebuck22
Senior Member
B
186posts
B
bigorangebuck22
Senior Member
186
posts
Fri, Dec 18, 2009 3:01 PMDec 18, 2009 3:01 PM
Are that many kickoffs reaching the endzone?
Dec 18, 2009 3:01pm
Bluepride13
Member
B
75posts
B
Bluepride13
Member
75
posts
Fri, Dec 18, 2009 3:05 PMDec 18, 2009 3:05 PM
Dont like 3. Too many injuries.
Dec 18, 2009 3:05pm
Sonofanump
S
S
Sonofanump
Sat, Dec 19, 2009 11:34 AMDec 19, 2009 11:34 AM
bigorangebuck22 wrote:
Are that many kickoffs reaching the endzone?
I see less than 10% and we saw 4 kickers this year being looked at by colleges.
Dec 19, 2009 11:34am
Sonofanump
S
S
Sonofanump
Sat, Dec 19, 2009 11:35 AMDec 19, 2009 11:35 AM
1. Double fouls when the ball is dead would offset as opposed to separate and in order. - Yes
2. Changing the definition of a chop block to eliminate the requirement that the low block be delayed to be illegal. –Indifferent, not an umpire.
3. Changing the definition of a chop block to only restrict the high/low combination (low/low would be legal). –Indifferent, not an umpire.
4. Changing the kickoff to the 35-yard line.-No, less than 10% of kicks go into the end zone.
5. Allowing corporate advertising to be on the field of play if in compliance with other Rule 1-2 restrictions. –Don’t care
6. Removing the restriction that football jerseys have to be tucked in if longer than the top of the pant. –No, sloppy.
7. Requiring a minimum number of players on either side of the kicker on a free kick. –Would not mind this NCAA rule.
8. Further clarifying the use of electronic equipment during a contest.
-Don’t care
9. Eliminating the five-yard face-mask foul.
–Would not mind this NCAA rule.
10. Removing the penalty-marker colored restrictions on football gloves and pads.
-Why?
Dec 19, 2009 11:35am
Walt
Senior Member
237posts
Walt
Senior Member
237
posts
Sat, Dec 19, 2009 3:50 PMDec 19, 2009 3:50 PM
Instead of #4.... why not just allow players to bring the ball out of the endzone. Is that a NFHS rule or just an Ohio rule?
Dec 19, 2009 3:50pm
yeahgoahead
Member
60posts
yeahgoahead
Member
60
posts
Sat, Dec 19, 2009 4:50 PMDec 19, 2009 4:50 PM
I agree with walt.
Dec 19, 2009 4:50pm
Sonofanump
S
S
Sonofanump
Sun, Dec 27, 2009 11:03 PMDec 27, 2009 11:03 PM
Walt wrote:
Instead of #4.... why not just allow players to bring the ball out of the endzone. Is that a NFHS rule or just an Ohio rule?
NFHS rule.
Dec 27, 2009 11:03pm
Dthane
Senior Member
D
169posts
D
Dthane
Senior Member
169
posts
Sun, Dec 27, 2009 11:46 PMDec 27, 2009 11:46 PM
Son thinks a dumb rule is when you drive the ball 80 yards, fumble it out of bounds in the endzone and it's a touchback. I does seem odd that if it fumbles an inch in front of the pylon and it's on the inch line, and if it goes an inch behind it, you lose the ball and 20 yards.