gerb131;1220770 wrote:What was his problem with the shorts?
Making Fed serve it out.
Couldnt he have just served and asked for another ball? Been simple enough.wildcats20;1220771 wrote:Lol this is going to sound so incredibly gay.
But on the run, he would have a ball pop out. It cost him a point in the quarters and he kept looking at his box like a little bitch.
gerb131;1220774 wrote:Couldnt he have just served and asked for another ball? Been simple enough.
Fed match point for #7 Wimbledon.
For about the next 3-4 years. Rafa is going to pass him as far as major wins most likely, and considering how much he has dominated their rivalry he will likely end up going down as the best ever.GOONx19;1220779 wrote:Roger now has all claim to the greatest tennis player of all time. Congrats to him.
How is that most likely? Who says Roger is done winning slams, and also how is it a foregone conclusion that Nadal will be unstoppable and surpass 17+ slams? A lot can change.IggyPride00;1221000 wrote:For about the next 3-4 years. Rafa is going to pass him as far as major wins most likely, and considering how much he has dominated their rivalry he will likely end up going down as the best ever.
He's only 26, and has a vice grip on the French Open that almost guarantees him that tourney every year because of his dominance on clay.How is that most likely?
Throw in Tsonga and Murray, and you have a pretty competitive field. It's not like it will be a cakewalk to the finals every slam as it was a few years ago when Nadal and Federer faced off in nearly every final.Laley23;1221190 wrote:It's certainly possible for Nadal to do it. But it's not like he is cleaning up right now. Joker is the guy to watch for until next years French. People are forgetting that Fed has been healthy his whole career. Nadal has had some major knee issues, and the way he plays, when he is 30 he will likely be done competing for titles...IMO. Fed has 2 more years because of his health and unreal fitness/court movement over the years.
Raw Dawgin' it;1219975 wrote:Sick of hearing "when will a brit win wimbledon" so i hope murray wins so the media can stfu about it next year.
What about Pete?Laley23;1221084 wrote:Fed isn't done, for 1. The Joker and Murray can win some. Nasal has bad knees. I don't see Rafa taking over. He is without a doubt the 2nd greatest ever though, IMO, behind Fed.
I love Pete, but Nadal is better. Career Grand Slam (Pete doesnt have that) alone would be an argument.gerb131;1221917 wrote:What about Pete?
Laley23;1222031 wrote:I love Pete, but Nadal is better. Career Grand Slam (Pete doesnt have that) alone would be an argument.
Nadal will pass Pete in time in Career Slams as well, and then there will be little doubt. Nadal DOMINATES clay like Pete did grass. But Nadal also has 4 majors outside of clay, including 2 Wimbledons. He is what, 25? Already 11 Slams. Pete retired at 14. I think Nadal will pass him within the next 3 years.
I think so as well. But I think that is still 4-5 more majors. Though Djokovich and Murray will have a lot to say about that.gport_tennis;1222038 wrote:I think Nadal has 2 or three more before his body breaks down.