data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jun 27, 2012 8:48pm
My point has nothing to do with production...he's a cheater. Braun*hasbeen;1212909 wrote:I just read about a pitcher who was in the majors up until the early 2000s in Sports Illustrated who said the opposite, I believe. He would use all offseason, start the season great, but then the longer he stopped using them, the worse he performed. It was a few weeks ago.
I don't see how steroids last year would help him all that much this year.
Just because the test results were thrown out, doesn't change the test results.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jun 27, 2012 8:49pm
No doubt in my mind that he juiced--none whatsoever
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2422/c2422b8d3a5288c1b4c0d3671e4c23dd4237dd1b" alt="hasbeen's avatar"
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Jun 27, 2012 8:52pm
okay.SportsAndLady;1213490 wrote:My point has nothing to do with production...he's a cheater. Braun*
Just because the test results were thrown out, doesn't change the test results.
were they performance enhancing drugs? because i don't see any difference in performance.